Cain asks Dana Quillman

1 ^

Can you put aside personal beliefs when presented factual evidence?

It is very important that our elected representatives make their decisions based on sound logic and factual evidence. Recently, I’ve read about a number of beliefs that you’ve articulated that are not supported by majority opinion.

Example: Quillman said that she believes the Gateway Area Plan, and other urbanist developments like it, is just one piece of a “globalist” plan that includes COVID, 5G technology and many other recent world developments with the aim of cowing the citizenry.

How will you balance those beliefs with the need to represent your average constituents’ opinion?

— Cain