Vehicle vs. Pedestrian Collision Impacts Traffic on Eureka’s Fourth Street

Andrew Goff / Today @ 2:25 p.m. / Traffic

EPD

UPDATE, 2:44 p.m.: EPD reports that the patient has been transported to the hospital by ambulance. The roadway is now open.

# # #

Original Post: Emergency personnel have responded to the corner of C and Fourth streets in Eureka where a patient is being treated after reportedly being hit by a car.

Traffic is reduced to one lane. The Eureka Police Department is asking that people avoid the area.


MORE →


Eureka Police Department Awarded $170K in State Funds to Crack Down on Illegal Tobacco Sales to Minors

LoCO Staff / Today @ 1:35 p.m. / Crime , Local Government

Eureka Police Department. | Photo: Andrew Goff

###

Press release from the California Department of Justice:

OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced the recipients of the California Department of Justice (DOJ)’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Proposition 56 Tobacco Grant Program. The grant recipients are 62 local government agencies located throughout the state, including law enforcement agencies, prosecuting agencies, public health departments, cities, and counties. In total, they will receive $28.5 million to support their efforts to reduce illegal tobacco sales to underage youth. This year’s funding prioritized retail enforcement and education as part of Attorney General Bonta’s commitment to fighting the illegal sales and marketing of tobacco products to minors. Funded activities include “flavor ban” enforcement efforts, minor decoy operations, shoulder tap operations, prosecution, tobacco retail license inspections, retailer education programs, task force coordination, training for officers on tobacco laws and ordinances, monitoring retailer compliance, and more.

“The sale of tobacco products to underage youth remains a serious problem. For almost a decade, Proposition 56 has provided much-needed funding to address that challenge,” said Attorney General Rob Bonta. “The grant recipients we have selected this year are committed to both holding accountable those who break the law and ensuring a healthier, safer future for the next generation. I’m proud to support and partner with these local government agencies.”

“The Fresno County Department of Public Health looks forward to working with the California Department of Justice to further protect the health and safety of our residents,” said Joe Prado, Director, Fresno County Department of Public Health.

“Receiving the Tobacco Grant is an important step in strengthening our community’s commitment to protecting youth,” said Brian Stephens, Eureka Police Chief. “The Eureka Police Department is proud to partner with the California Department of Justice to ensure local retailers follow the law and prevent access to tobacco products by minors. This collaboration reinforces our dedication to education, compliance, and the long-term health of our community’s young people.”

“Recognizing the dangers of tobacco use by children, the El Cajon Police Department is proud to partner with the California Department of Justice in accepting this grant,” said Jeremiah Larson, El Cajon Police Department Chief of Police. “This collaboration strengthens our commitment to preventing underage tobacco access and increasing awareness throughout our community and among local businesses.”

“The City of Sacramento Code Enforcement Division is honored to be selected, through this highly competitive process, for 2025/26 California Department of Justice’s Tobacco Grant Program,” said Peter Lemos, Code and Housing Enforcement Chief, the City of Sacramento. “We sincerely thank the CA DOJ for reviewing and selecting our application, and for recognizing the need within our community. This funding will strengthen our ability to expand our tobacco enforcement efforts and enhance public health and safety within the City of Sacramento.”

“This grant is more than funding, it’s a commitment to protecting our neighborhoods,” said Jeremy Profitt, Police Support Manager, the City of Fairfield. “Through it, we will strengthen quality of life, reduce crime, and cut down on the flow of tobacco products that target our youth and underserved communities.”

“San Joaquin County Public Health Services is fortunate to receive this grant as an opportunity both to address the need to protect the community from illegal sales of commercial tobacco and to promote collaboration among our law enforcement agencies to create a meaningful impact on community safety and public health,” said Vince Nallas, Public Health Educator/Smoking & Tobacco Prevention Program (STOPP) Project Coordinator, San Joaquin County Public Health Services.

“I am honored to accept this award on behalf of the City of South El Monte. This recognition reflects our steadfast commitment to safeguarding the health and wellbeing of our residents, especially our youth. Preventing the sale of and accessibility to tobacco products in our community has been a priority and we will continue to advance policies that promote a healthier, safe future for all families,” said Gloria Olmos, Mayor of South El Monte. “I am grateful to our community partners, city staff, and colleagues who have supported these efforts. Together, we are creating a stronger more resilient South El Monte.”

“The City of Orange Code Enforcement Division is grateful and excited to receive its first tobacco grant, which will help prevent illegal sales to minors and reduce the availability of unlawful smoking devices and tobacco products,” said Rafael Perez, Code Compliance Manager, the City of Orange.

Earlier this year, Attorney General Bonta reminded tobacco manufacturers and importers that, pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 3218 (Wood, 2024), the Attorney General’s Office is required to establish a Unflavored Tobacco List (UTL), a list of unflavored tobacco products that are lawful for sale in California. To be considered for the initial publication of the UTL, tobacco manufacturers and importers were required to submit completed applications by October 9, 2025. The Attorney General will publish the UTL by December 31, 2025.

Tobacco use is the number one preventable killer in the United States. Smoking-related illness accounts for approximately 40,000 deaths annually in California. Nicotine, a key component of cigarettes and most e-cigarettes, is highly addictive and harmful to the developing brains of children and young adults.

DOJ’s Tobacco Grant Program aims to reduce childhood addiction to tobacco products by, among other things, supporting local partners that:

  • Enforce the statewide retail flavor ban and similar local retail flavor ordinances.
  • Prosecute and penalize retailers who violate statewide and local tobacco laws, including those who sell or market tobacco products to youth under the age of 21, including over the internet.
  • Conduct retail inspections to ensure compliance.

The program is funded by Proposition 56, the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016. With this year’s awards, the Tobacco Grant Program has made over 540 grant awards and distributed over $240 million in funding to local agencies through a competitive process.



Misinformation Spreads as Trump Moves to Cut Aid for Some California Students

CalMatters staff / Today @ 7:58 a.m. / Sacramento

This story, reported by Adam Echelman and Mikhail Zinchteyn, was originally published by CalMattersSign up for their newsletters.

###

In summary

The Trump administration is suing California, asking the state to end its policies allowing students without legal status to access in-state tuition and financial aid. But the administration’s legal argument is weak, according to top legal experts.

###

Hours after the Trump administration sued California last week, threatening to end key benefits for students without legal status, Michelle was scrolling social media when she saw a video that made her panic.

The Trump administration is challenging California’s policy of providing in-state tuition, scholarships and subsidized loans to immigrants without legal status — including Michelle, an immigrant who is a community college student in San Mateo County. CalMatters has agreed to withhold her full name because she fears drawing attention to her legal status.

On TikTok, rumors swirled. Michelle saw a video of a young man, around her age, asking if the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, is gone. In reality, FAFSA is still around, and while the new lawsuit could affect some students’ financial aid, some top legal experts say the Trump administration is unlikely to win. Regardless, the court process may take weeks or much longer to resolve the government’s claims against California.

In the lawsuit, the U.S. Department of Justice alleges that California’s policy of granting in-state tuition and financial aid for some students without legal status is unconstitutional. Federal lawyers also argue that California’s policies violate a 1996 federal law, which bars states from providing benefits to residents without legal status that aren’t also available to U.S. citizens who live anywhere in the U.S. The Justice Department is arguing that California either needs to drop the policy or let all U.S. citizens, including those who are out-of-state, pay the same rate.

In California, over 100,000 college students lack legal status, according to one estimate by an alliance of university leaders who advocate for immigrants. Federal assistance, such as Pell grants and federal student loans, are off-limits to anyone who isn’t a U.S. citizen or does not have permanent legal status. California has its own money for college financial aid, which it distributes according to state law.

As long as individuals meet certain requirements, such as attending three years of high school in California, they’re eligible for in-state tuition, saving as much as $39,000 of dollars each year compared to their out-of-state peers. Once they meet those requirements, students without legal status can also qualify for the state’s cornerstone financial aid program, known as Cal Grant, though only a small fraction of these students actually apply for and receive it.

To Kevin Johnson, a law professor at UC Davis, Trump’s actions may be more about political wins than legal ones. “The Trump administration is engaged in a full-court press on undocumented immigrants and so-called sanctuary jurisdictions, and California and Governor Newsom in particular,” Johnson said. That the U.S. Department of Justice named the suit “United States of America v. Newsom” is another indication that this is political, he added.

Others noted that states have already invested in students without legal status and denying them an affordable path toward a college education is a waste of resources. Economists have pointed out that immigrants without status also are integral to the U.S. workforce and aren’t easily replaceable.

‘We didn’t expect them to go this low’

Even weak lawsuits or outright misinformation can make students nervous during November, when college and financial aid application season is in full swing.

On TikTok, videos of students panicking about the financial aid system surfaced last winter, after the Biden administration delayed and botched the rollout of the new FAFSA. Among its many glitches, the new form prevented students whose parents lacked a Social Security number from submitting their information.

After Trump was elected last November, fears about the total demise of federal financial aid swirled again on TikTok. Over the course of this year, as his administration targets universities and continues to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, those fears have persisted.

In California, Trump seeks to impose a $1 billion penalty on UCLA for alleged civil rights abuses, though a federal judge recently handed the White House a temporary loss on that front. His administration is also suing California colleges and universities for alleged antisemitism violations and has sought to freeze or curtail billions of dollars in federal research funding.

Much of those freezes have been blocked or reversed by federal judges, but hundreds of millions of dollars still remain cut off to campuses. Much, if not all, of those friction points between California and Trump could be resolved through settlements and negotiations, which are political in nature, said UCLA law professor Hiroshi Motomura in an interview.

Before Trump was elected, state leaders, including Assemblymember David Alvarez, a Chula Vista Democrat, pushed for California to offer additional benefits to students without legal status, such as the opportunity to work campus jobs.

Now, with access to financial aid programs at risk for these students, Alvarez said the focus is shifting. “We didn’t expect it would go this low as to go after students that the president had previously said should be welcomed here.” In 2024, Trump told a podcast host that students should “automatically” receive “a Green Card,” otherwise known as permanent residency, when they get their college diploma.

Legal scholars doubt Trump’s lawsuit will win

The lawsuit against California is the Trump administration’s sixth against states with policies allowing in-state tuition for students without legal status. The White House went after Texas first, in June. Underscoring how much of a bipartisan issue in-state tuition is, Texan lawmakers were the first in the U.S. to enshrine the policy in 2001. In all, more than 20 states passed some in-state tuition policy benefiting some residents without legal status.Trump’s legal attacks on the policy this year prompted leaders in Kentucky, Oklahoma and Texas to side with the White House to terminate the benefit in those respective states. Some legal groups that want to continue in-state tuition for students lacking legal status are challenging those states’ moves.Trump has also sued Minnesota and Illinois, states with Democrats as governors and attorneys general who are challenging Trump’s lawsuits.

The U.S. Department of Justice says that the federal law in question bars students without legal status from receiving in-state tuition and financial aid benefits based on their living in the state. This, the federal lawyers argue, violates federal law since public campuses in California require U.S. citizens from other states to pay higher tuition rates. However, California’s law, Assembly Bill 540, doesn’t extend in-state tuition based on where students live, scholars and a previous court ruling say. Instead, students generally need to prove that they attended three years of high school or community college in California; they also need to earn in California a high school diploma or obtain enough community college credits to be eligible for transfer into a public university.The Department of Justice says those three-year high school or community college requirements are tantamount to an in-state residency criteria and therefore violate the 1996 federal law.But the California Supreme Court in 2010 already struck down that interpretation. The high court observed that some students living in areas bordering California are permitted to study at California high schools. High school students from out of state enrolled in private boarding schools also satisfy the requirement; they don’t count as residents of California either. And students who were residents of California during high school but moved to a different state could still enroll in California colleges or universities paying in-state tuition.

All of these scenarios require a student to complete the same AB 540 application as students who lack legal status. The only difference is that students without status must also complete an affidavit that they’ll pursue legal residency as soon as they can.

In fact, the University of California enrolled more students under AB 540 who were legal U.S. residents than those who weren’t, the state high court said then.

“If Congress had intended to prohibit states entirely from making unlawful aliens eligible for in-state tuition, it could easily have done so,” the state Supreme Court wrote in 2010. But Congress didn’t do that, the court noted.Lawmakers in California who passed AB 540 in 2001 knew what the federal law restricted, said Motomura, and they crafted a state law that wouldn’t contravene what Congress intended. “It was drafted to avoid the residency test, and it was drafted to avoid the exclusion of U.S. citizens,” he said.

What’s likely next

California has already signaled that it will fight the lawsuit. “The Trump Administration has once again missed the mark with its latest attack on California, and we look forward to proving it in court,” wrote Nina Sheridan, a spokesperson for the California Department of Justice.

Both the UC and the community college system said their tuition and financial aid policies have always been legally compliant. The Cal State University system did not respond to a request for comment.The Trump administration may also seek a preliminary injunction to halt California’s in-state tuition law for nonresidents, which would again expose Californians to a seesaw of temporary court orders, sometimes contradictory in nature, while the full legal merits of the case play out slowly in court.Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, or MALDEF, thinks the U.S. Supreme Court will likely side with California despite its conservative orientation if the case goes that far.A major legal question underscoring the case against California is when and how federal rules preempt or supersede state laws. The Trump White House is arguing California’s in-state policies are preempted by federal law. But the legal concept of preemption is a pillar in jurisprudence. Liberal and conservative interests benefit similarly from a consistent application of preemption as a legal concept, Saenz said. For example, businesses rely on preemption rules in situations where a state law is more progressive or consumer-friendly than a federal rule and want courts to defend them from following the more demanding state rules.The U.S. Supreme Court is “going to be very wary of making bad law in the realm of preemption, because it could then come back to bite the right wing in protecting businesses,” Saenz said.

For Michelle and other students without legal status navigating their own financial aid applications — and the misinformation online — a series of temporary court orders could create more panic. Financial aid is top of mind, said Michelle, but she doesn’t have time to track the legal back-and-forth of her eligibility.

In addition to being a full-time student, Michelle works four days a week at a restaurant, saving up money not only to support herself but also her family. She’s the oldest of four kids and said she sends $500 to her parents each month.

College is “an opportunity for me to be someone in life, to make my parents proud,” she said. Asked about the lawsuit at the cafeteria of her college, Michelle made a choking gesture with her hand, as though the threat of losing financial aid next year could kill her. “Trump is taking that opportunity away because he doesn’t like immigrants.”

The deadline to submit financial aid applications for community college is Sept. 2, but Michelle is already working on her application, just in case.



Beware of Scam Emails Pretending to Be From Eureka’s Planning and Development Services Department

LoCO Staff / Yesterday @ 4:30 p.m. /

Press release from the City of Eureka:

The City of Eureka is alerting residents and businesses about a fraudulent email scam impersonating the City’s Planning and Development Services Department. This email, sent from planning.eurekaca@usa.com, is not associated with the City of Eureka. 

Details of the Scam 

The scam involves a fraudulent invoice attached to the email, requesting a wire transfer payment. The invoice falsely uses the City of Eureka logo and includes incorrect contact information. These fraudulent emails are designed to appear official but are not affiliated with the City of Eureka. 

What to Do 

  • Do not respond to the email or provide payment.
  • Verify invoices of communications by contacting City of Eureka directly or the Development Services Department at 707-441-4160.
  • If you have sent money or feel you have been a victim of a scam, contact the City of Eureka Police Department at 707-441-4044. 
How to Identify Legitimate City Communications and Invoices 
  • All official City of Eureka emails end with @eurekaca.gov or @ci.eureka.ca.gov. Be cautious of any communication claiming to be from the City that does not follow this format.
  • If you receive a suspicious email about payment for a planning or building application or have doubts about an email’s authenticity, please contact the Development Services Department immediately at 707-441-4160. 

Thank you for your vigilance in helping to protect our community safe from scams. 

Contact for Questions

For questions regarding the fraudulent Development Services emails and invoices, contact Miles Slattery, City Manager, phone: (707) 441-4184, email: mslattery@eurekaca.gov.



Crisp Lounge and Cannabis Dispensary in Eureka is Closing; Owner Says the City Has ‘Too Many’ Weed Stores

Ryan Burns / Yesterday @ 4:10 p.m. / Business , Cannabis

The Crisp Lounge, at 2029 Broadway Street in Eureka. | Photos by Ryan Burns.

###

The Crisp Lounge and cannabis dispensary, which coupled weed sales and indoor consumption with everything from live music and comedy to pool tournaments, karaoke and “paranormal open mic” nights, is going out of business.

The owners announced the pending closure on social media this week, saying the smoking lounge’s last day of operations will be this Saturday while the dispensary at the other end of the building — a former used appliance store on Broadway, painted black with neon stoner graffiti — will remain open through the end of the year, or until its stock sells out. 

That marks two Eureka dispensary closure announcements in the past few days, with this one coming on the heels of one from the Gold Rush/Green Rush drive-through just half a mile down the road. 

Dean Crisp, the owner and founder of Crisp Lounge, said it’s a simple matter of supply and demand, with the city’s supply of weed shops far exceeding consumer demand in this depressed economy.

“There’s too many here,” Crisp said when we caught up with him at the lounge earlier today. “Why would I stay open when they’re gonna open four more here any day?” (There are, in fact, at least two more dispensaries expected to open on Broadway in the coming months.)

A Virginia native with a laid-back drawl, Crisp rode the rise and fall of Humboldt County’s green rush over the past 15-plus years. After building houses for a few years in Costa Rica, in 2009 he came to Humboldt (like many others) to trim weed and (like many others) wound up sticking around.

Crisp said he helped one guy build an indoor growing facility, which later burned to the ground. He then helped operate a farm for about a year before he and a friend “got our shit together” and started their own farming operation. Eventually, he was operating three farms off of Forest Service Route 1 in Southern Humboldt. 

“We had a good run for a while,” he said. “We created a lot of jobs and paid a lot of taxes.”

But legalization didn’t work out the way he (like many others) had hoped.

“We spent a fucking million dollars going legal — put in ponds and roads, you know, all the bullshit we had to do — and we didn’t make a fucking dime after doing all that shit,” Crisp said. “I used to pay over a hundred grand a year in taxes before I ever got a fucking plant in the ground.”

Still, he was optimistic when he sold his farms to launch Crisp Lounge. He began renovating the building right before the COVID pandemic but didn’t open until April of 2023 due mostly to permitting delays, he said. 

The dispensary inside Crisp.

###

“I thought it would be a huge hit here because it’s a cool thing,” Crisp said. “Where can you go anywhere and consume cannabis, let alone inside, right? A lot of people like to come here because they don’t want to go to a bar. They don’t want to be around a bunch of alcoholics. So they come in here and they hang out and they burn one or they get a cup of coffee and they chill.”

But expenses — including “crazy” monthly rent and $7,000 in annual permitting fees from the City of Eureka — are high. And as the region’s economy has tanked, his competition seems only to increase. There are now more than a dozen dispensaries in Eureka alone. 

He’s a bit jaded about the local government’s regulatory approach. 

“Here’s how I feel about it: They know what’s going to happen to people here,” he said, referring to Eureka officials. “They know that if you put $200,000 into a building here for cannabis, you’re not gonna make a fucking dime, dude. But they’re gonna get their $5,000 to get their fuckin’ cut.” 

He sighed. “Maybe I’m wrong, but … all we got here is thrift stores, head shops and dispensaries.”

He later acknowledged that he put all of his eggs into this one basket and wound up losing it all — all except for the knowledge he’s gained. Crisp said he loves Humboldt and doesn’t want to leave, but there are opportunities for him in Florida. He’s confident that he can use what he’s learned here to advise aspiring weed entrepreneurs on the East Coast. 

Crisp hopes to liquidate his inventory by the middle of December and move to Florida sometime in the next five months. 

He took one more dig at how the city and county have regulated the industry, saying they “killed it” and drove everybody out of business. But then he added, “It would have happened anyway. I don’t think it would have happened as fast, to be honest with you. But it was inevitable. The gold rush is over for cannabis.”

He still believes in the concept of an Amsterdam-style consumption lounge, a place where you can smoke weed, sip espresso or kombucha and hang out with your friends. But he said the surrounding economy will have to be better for such an operation to succeed.

Still, Crisp has maintained the laid-back equanimity of a true Humboldt local. Looking back on his cannabis experiences here, he said, “It was a good run, bro.”

Halloween garlands still hang inside Crisp Lounge.



At St. Vincent de Paul’s Eureka Dining Facility, Local Students Take Up the Slack as Longtime Volunteers Retire

Isabella Vanderheiden / Yesterday @ 2:38 p.m. / Community , Food , Homelessness

St. Bernard’s student Alawna Hall assembles home-cooked lunches for hungry diners at St. Vincent de Paul’s dining facility in Eureka. | Photo: Isabella Vanderheiden

###

For decades, St. Vincent de Paul’s dining facility in Eureka has provided free home-cooked meals to food-insecure residents with the help of a core group of volunteers. But in the years following the COVID pandemic, the nonprofit has struggled to maintain its base as longtime volunteers retire and fewer people step up to replace them. 

Bob Santilli

“It’s a universal problem for any small-budget nonprofit organization,” Bob Santilli, board president for the St. Vincent de Paul Society - Redwood Region, told the Outpost. “The whole industry relies on an older clientele — typically retirees — who have the available time, and they are aging and dying off. … We recently lost a couple of long-term volunteers who were in their 90s — one passed away, and the other is in assisted care now. Right before our eyes, our core volunteer base is leaving us.”

Santilli believes the answer to the organization’s volunteer woes is getting more young people involved in the community service sector. 

For the last two years, Patti Dutton and Laura Middlemiss, leading members of Soroptimist International of Humboldt Bay, have helped connect the dining facility with local students through “S” Clubs, or service clubs, at Eureka High School and St. Bernard’s Academy that encourage girls and young women to help the community. The partnerships have brought dozens of first-time volunteers into the fold.

“Every Monday, I usually bring four girls to come down and spend two hours serving lunch to help out St. Vincent’s dining room,” Dutton told the Outpost while volunteering during a bustling lunch service on Monday. “They’re always a little hesitant at first, but then they come and do it and everyone, every time on the trip back to school says, ‘I want to come back, I want to do it again.’”

“I already have a sign-up list that goes through next spring, almost to the end of the school year,” she added. “That many kids are excited about coming to volunteer here.”

A group of sixth graders from St. Bernard’s Academy (affectionately referred to as “squirrels”) stir up a batch of trail mix. | Photo: Bob Santilli

For St. Bernard’s student Alawna Hall, the two-year volunteer experience has helped her step out of her comfort zone and deepen her compassion for other people.

“I think [volunteering] helps you to get a better perspective and understanding that everyone walks different paths in life, and that you should be able to see them all and not judge, and just be there to help,” Hall said while taking a quick break from assembling lunch trays. “I think volunteering when you’re younger really helps you to develop and set up a better mindset for when you’re older. If you can put yourself in a situation to work with people who need help, and just be judge-free and there to help with nothing else benefiting you, I think it sets you up to succeed better in your own life.”

Scarlett Zerlang, another St. Bernard’s student, acknowledged that a lot of her peers get into volunteer work to satisfy community service requirements for school or scholarship applications, “but once you start doing it, you realize how fulfilling it is,” she said.

“It’s fun to serve people and to see their smiles,” Zerlang continued. “Everyone’s so kind here, and it’s just nice to do something outside of yourself, right? … I think that when we introduce that to kids during high school, hopefully they can carry that feeling on and continue to serve their community outside of high school.”

A group of East High volunteers pose with a huge pumpkin pie and other Thanksgiving sides. | Photo: Bob Santilli

Earlier this year, Natalie Heckman, student support counselor at East High School in Fortuna, started bringing in another group of students to lend a hand with meal prep and clean up on Tuesdays. The volunteer work helps students check off some of the service hours needed to graduate and gives them an opportunity to give back to their community.

“I think it’s super important — especially as a school counselor — because all I want is [for] my kids to be passionate about something and to learn from people who are helping our community,” Heckman said. “For some of my students, it’s been a full-circle moment because they came here and they ate as young children with their families … and now they’re volunteering and giving back. It’s been eye-opening.”

The extra hands in the kitchen are welcome additions for Mary Price, the 20-year head cook at St. Vinny’s dining hall. Like Santilli, she’s seen the organization’s volunteer base wane over the years, putting additional strain on regular support staff. The surge in new volunteers “frees [staff] up to do other things, and gives them self-fulfillment.”

“[Volunteering] shows them that things aren’t always what you see on TV. This is the real world; this is about as real as it gets,” Price said, gesturing to the dining hall. “Some of their parents were really wary when they first started volunteering … but now we have a lot of parents that come back and volunteer [with them].”

St. Vinny’s staff is always on the lookout for volunteers of all ages, but Santilli wants to keep working with local schools to keep the students in the mix. 

“You get to talking with these youngsters, and they’re very upbeat when they’re here, very self-reliant and they quickly learn whatever tasks are presented to them,” he said. “And now, there’s some talkin’ like, ‘I’d like to go into sociology when I go to college’ or ‘I want to volunteer on my own time.’

Those interested in volunteering can contact St. Vincent de Paul’s dining hall at (707) 445-9588. Additional information can be found here.

St. Vinny’s volunteers Tae Richard and Father Mike Cloney. | Photo: Isabella Vanderheiden



(WARNING: GRAPHIC) HCSO Releases Video of Deadly July Encounter With 35-Year-Old Eureka Man

LoCO Staff / Yesterday @ 12:26 p.m. / News

Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office press release:

On July 26, 2025, a deputy involved shooting occurred in the Glendale area. When we have a critical incident, we want to release as much information as possible as soon as the investigation allows. Today we are able to share with our community a critical incident video which includes an overview of the July 26th incident and corresponding video.

The below linked video contains graphic images and explicit language that may be disturbing to some viewers. This video is not suitable for children. Viewer discretion advised.

PREVIOUSLY: