Press release from the Humboldt County Drug Task Force:

On November 13th, 2025, the Humboldt County Drug Task Force (HCDTF) served a search warrant for Dana Jensen (64 years old from Blue Lake) and his associated residence located near the 1200 block of Blue Lake Boulevard in Blue Lake. During the months of October and November 2025, HCDTF investigated the residence for selling large quantities of methamphetamine in Humboldt County. 

Upon service of the search warrant, Agents located 14 ounces of methamphetamine, 17 firearms and $141,885.47 in US currency. 

At the conclusion of the investigation, HCDTF Agents booked Jensen into the Humboldt County Correctional Facility for the following charges:

• HS 11378– Possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of sales
• HS 11379(a) – Transportation of a controlled substance for the purpose of sales
• HS 11370.1 – Possession of a controlled substance while armed

Anyone with information related to this investigation or other narcotics related crimes is encouraged to call the Humboldt County Drug Task Force at 707-267-9976.

James

Incumbent Yurok Tribal Chairman Joseph L. James defeated challenger Susan Masten in Wednesday’s runoff election by a vote of 605 (52.84 percent) to 540 (47.16 percent), according to unofficial results released by the tribe. The tribe’s election board is scheduled to meet today to certify the results. 

James and Masten emerged as the top vote-getters among six candidates in the October primary. 

Masten, a lifelong political activist for Tribal and women’s rights, previously served as Yurok Tribal Chairperson from 1997-2003. She congratulated James on his victory last night in a Facebook post and urged her supporters to stay involved. 

James, whose long track record in tribal government includes work on fisheries, water policy, infrastructure and economic development, was first elected Yurok chairman in 2018.

###

Remember SUGAR BEAR-MANIA in those heady, post-pandemic days of late 2021? Congress demanded tribute of a Christmas tree from the Six Rivers National Forest, and we served up that majestic 84-foot white fir that would soon be hauled across the nation and into history. 

Well, it’s almost Christmas again, and you can reenact this emotionally cathartic event on a somewhat smaller scale by acquiring your own Christmas centerpiece from Six Rivers National Forest. Get yours before the feds do! Here’s all the details.

Press release from Six Rivers National Forest:

Christmas tree permits will be available to purchase online through Recreation.gov beginning November 1, 2025. Details about designated cutting areas, dates, and types of trees that may be cut may be found here: Six Rivers National Forest Christmas Tree Permit.

“National forests offer exceptional recreation experiences for local communities to enjoy the outdoors,” said USDA Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz. “These experiences create lasting memories that persist through generations. Visiting a national forest to select a tree that will serve as the centerpiece for the holiday season establishes a meaningful connection between the local forest and a family’s story.”

To purchase a Christmas tree permit, visit Recreation.gov and search for Six Rivers National Forest Christmas Tree Permits. It is important to carefully read the overview and need-to-know information prior to purchasing the permit. Visitors will also need to set up or log in to a Recreation.gov account to complete the transaction.

Fourth graders with an Every Kid Outdoors pass are eligible for a free Christmas tree permit and can apply by entering the pass or voucher number when purchasing a permit (note: a $2.50 reservation fee will be applied).

Cutting a Christmas tree also improves forest health. The permit system helps thin densely populated stands of small-diameter trees. Local forest health experts identify areas that benefit from thinning trees that tend to be the perfect size for Christmas trees. Removing these trees in designated areas helps other trees grow larger and can open areas that provide forage for wildlife.

For more information, visit these online resources:

• Recreation.gov Christmas Tree Permit page with map interface
• Help Center article “How Do I Purchase and Print a Christmas Tree Permit?”
• Cut a Tree for the Holidays from Your National Forest article
• Every Kid Outdoors Fourth Grade Pass program

###

###

Nile is homeless. He has had it rough; he looks chafed by the elements. His eyes have retreated into his sockets. They peer out under his brows like an owl, but without the raptor’s glare. In fact, he was nothing but grateful last week while addressing the Arcata City Council, thanking a program the council decided to give $154,000. 

“It’s changed my trajectory in the community,” he said. “It’s given me purpose…My experience with this group has allowed me to grow through the chaos of what everyone involved goes through. It actually allowed me to become more grounded as a community member.”

Nile was praising OurSpace, an arts program for the homeless put on by the Arcata Playhouse. Started in 2022, a few times a week volunteers set up a place where anyone could show up, create, and get some hot food. Participants can dance, write poetry, or paint. It gives them something to do and a way to meet people, a huge asset for a group often afflicted with mental health issues, said Caroline Griffith, an OurSpace co-director,. Artists have made everything from collages to a giant paper turtle.

“More than anything, people need housing,” Griffith said at the Nov. 5 city council meeting. “People need shelter. People need to be safe. But we also know that people need more than just shelter and food in order to thrive and be full human beings. We are there to fit that niche, and to be a part of this ecosystem of services, to make sure that we are serving the whole person and really thinking about wellness and what it really takes for people who are experiencing substance use disorder and the co-occurring mental health conditions to actually be able to move into something better.”

Around 30 people attended every time OurSpace opened its doors, usually about three times a week in a room in the Arcata Presbyterian Church. But that only lasted until May of 2025; Griffith said in an interview with the Outpost that a homeowner near the church threatened to sue the church unless they stopped renting to OurSpace. The church didn’t have the money to fight the suit, and OurSpace left. (Griffith said the neighbor put their house up on the market for $1.2 million soon afterward.) 

Since then, OurSpace operated out of a wagon, wheeling art supplies, snacks, and coffee down to the Arcata plaza on sunny days a couple times a week. They needed something else.

The $154,000 will buy a 30-foot trailer that OurSpace can set up out of four days a week (as well as a truck to haul it, plus expenses) letting them operate in places where many homeless people live. They’ll be able to haul around tables, awnings, and plenty of ways to create; Griffith likened her vision to something akin to a circus. OurSpace participants have said they’d like to have everything from printmaking supplies to clay to musical instruments. The loss of the church’s piano was a blow to many of them, Griffith said. 

Future plans for the group include an art show, the fourth edition of their zine, and a mural.

Obviously, being homeless is stressful. Focusing on securing basic amenities and a place to sleep every night doesn’t leave any space to unwind, Griffith said. Spending a few hours every week on something whimsical like a poem or a painting lets people burn off some energy and relax; making new friends who are in the same situation as you, that can understand what you’re going through, helps too. 

Griffith said she’s asked participants what kind of living situation they’d want, if the world was ideal. “We’ve had people kind of pause and be like, ‘Wow. Nobody asks me that,’” Griffith said. “To actually take the time and space to think about more than just what is right in front of them is really beneficial for folks.”

“There’s a huge disconnect in our community between people who are housed and people who are not,” she said. “And it is so wonderful to be able to connect in a way that isn’t about anybody’s housing status. It’s about our shared humanity…We need to figure out a way to move past that barrier between those who are housed and those who are not, because it’s not going to get any easier.”

The money for these projects comes from $4 billion in settlements from several massive lawsuits California brought against opioid distributors and manufacturers for their roles in starting and perpetuating the ongoing opioid epidemic (including Walgreens, Walmart, CVS, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Perdue, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson and Johnson’s parent company). 85% of the settlement money goes to local governments and must be spent on programs that focus on alleviating the harms from widespread opioid addiction, which can include increasing services for the homeless. 

Since 2022, Arcata has received $491,000 of the funds and will likely add just short of $1 million to the pile over the next 13 years. Payouts are scheduled to stop in 2028, but the city will earn more funding from pending or future lawsuits.

Another $217,000 of the funds went to the Arcata House Partnership (AHP), another group that offers food and shelter for the homeless, to rent 20 motel rooms in Valley West for temporary emergency housing. It will operate from Nov. 15, 2025 to March 15, 2026 on a first-come, first-served basis. Besides shelter, residents will receive substance-use disorder treatments, food, and mental health support. The focus will be on homeless people living in illegal encampments. 

AHP is candid about the shortcomings of the project. 

“There will not be enough staff or time to successfully resolve most people from being homeless to being sheltered or housed and addressing opioid use,” reads their proposal. “Nor will most people involved want to transition to a shelter or permanent housing or participate in harm reduction or recovery offerings. This will be an immediate but temporary option. There is simply not enough funding, shelter beds or permanent housing to successfully resolve most people.”

Participants will be allowed to stay for 60 days, maximum. 

Arcata city manager Merritt Perry said that the city approached AHP with a desire to help out with any urgent needs they had, and worked together to come up with a budget the city felt was sustainable. 

“Rather than having these funds sit there and not do any good,” Perry said at the meeting, “How can we do some good in the community now?”

Despite the program’s limitations, AHP Executive Director Darlene Spoor thinks it’ll at least make some positive impact. 

“But why would we even try at this point to encourage people to seek recovery when we have no other option?” Spoor said to the council. “So this is the beginning. This is the option. This is how we connect with people. We bring them in.”

AHP did not respond to a request for comment as of publication.

Press release from the Humboldt County Drug Task Force:

On November 12th, 2025, The Humboldt County Drug Task Force (HCDTF) served a multi-location search warrant for Fransico Javier Herrera-Mancillas (31 years old from Arcata) and Jesus Diaz Palacios (44 years old from Sonora, Mexico) and their associated residences located in the 2000 block of Mad River Road in Arcata, 1500 block of Spear Avenue in Arcata and the 4900 block of Monterey Drive, in Arcata.

During the months of October and November 2025, HCDTF investigated an Arcata based drug trafficking organization in which they identified Herrera-Mancillas and Palacios as being the leaders. 

Upon service of the search warrants, Agents located over 2 and a half pounds of cocaine, over 2 ounces of methamphetamine and $12,304.00 in US currency. 

At the conclusion of the investigation, HCDTF booked Herrera-Mancillas into the Humboldt County Correctional Facility for the following charges:

• HS 11351 – Possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of sales
• HS 11352(a) – Transportation of a controlled substance for the purpose of sales
• HS 11378 – Possession of a narcotic for the purpose of sales

At the conclusion of the investigation, HCDTF booked Palacios into the Humboldt County Correctional Facility for the following charges:

• HS 11351 - Possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of sales
• HS 11352(a) - Transportation of a controlled substance for the purpose of sales
• PC 182(a)(1) - Conspiracy

Anyone with information related to this investigation or other narcotics related crimes is encouraged to call the Humboldt County Drug Task Force at 707-267-9976.

Press release from Mike McGuire for Congress:

State Senate Leader Mike McGuire today announced his grassroots campaign for Congress in California’s 1st Congressional District, pledging to bring his can-do approach, successful record of delivering results for rural California, and relentless energy to our nation’s capital.

Senator McGuire — raised by his single mom and grandma on a small ranch in Sonoma County — has built his life around a simple code passed down by his grandmother: work hard, work together, and never take “no” for an answer.

These words to live by have defined his leadership in the State Senate, where he’s rolled up his sleeves and achieved major progress on some of California’s toughest issues. As President of the California State Senate, McGuire led efforts to make life more affordable for millions of Californians — building workforce housing, protecting rural healthcare, and modernizing local schools. McGuire led the way in making California more wildfire-safe, doubling the number of CalFire firefighters. And, known for his tireless work ethic, he’s been relentless in his fight against Donald Trump’s attacks on our communities and our democracy.

“Together, we’ve been fighting tooth and nail for Northern California — making our state more wildfire-safe, investing record funding in our kids and public schools, standing up to corporate polluters, and defending this state from Donald Trump’s vicious attacks,” Senator McGuire said. “Now, we’re going to bring that fight to Washington — to bring down costs for working families, protect healthcare for every American, and defend our democracy from Donald Trump. I’m all in for Northern California, every damn day.”

As Senate Leader, McGuire led the most impactful affordability package in decades — providing $60 billion in electric bill rebates, advancing the renters’ tax credits, deploying broadband to rural communities, and expanding the first-time home buyers program. He’s expanded childcare, kept rural hospitals open, and created good-paying jobs across Northern California.

McGuire enters the race with major endorsements from some of Northern California’s most influential Democratic leaders — earning the support of Senator Adam Schiff, Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, Congressman Mike Thompson, Congressman Jared Huffman, Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey (ret), and every Democratic County Supervisor in the district. Rep. Mike Thompson praised Senator McGuire’s record of effective leadership and deep roots in the region.

“Mike McGuire has delivered for Northern California — from wildfire response and recovery to schools, from affordable housing to healthcare,” said Congressman Thompson. “He’ll be a powerful voice in Congress for the working families and rural communities he’s always championed.”

McGuire is running to unseat Republican Congressman Doug LaMalfa, one of Donald Trump’s most loyal allies in Congress. LaMalfa has voted repeatedly to defund Planned Parenthood, to strip millions of Americans of their healthcare (42% of CA-01 is enrolled in Medicaid), to gut wildfire prevention funding, and he has repeatedly sided with corporate interests over working Californians.

“We need a leader who will stand up for all of us, not a lapdog for Donald Trump. Doug LaMalfa has spent years voting against the people of Northern California — taking food off our tables, ripping healthcare away from millions, and making life more expensive for all of us — all while giving billionaires the biggest tax breaks they’ve ever seen. Enough is enough; it’s time for a change. Starting today, we’ll be in every single city and town in these nine counties — knocking on thousands of doors in the biggest grassroots campaign the North State has seen in decades,” McGuire said.

Mike and his wife Erika live in Geyserville with their son Connor, next door to his mom, along with their pug Gertrude.

###

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

###

Upon hearing her husband’s call for help, Cynthia Halliday came flying upstairs. He was rushing toward the outdoor deck, gasping for air. He was having a heart attack.

Halliday held him and dialed 911 with her cellphone. The dispatcher answered, but within seconds, she said, the call disconnected due to poor reception. Halliday screamed for help, loud enough for her next-door neighbor Larry Williams to hear and dial from his copper landline. This time, it got through.

Halliday’s husband did not survive. But on that day in 2018, Halliday became convinced that copper landlines were her best shot at getting help during emergencies, especially where she lives in Hacienda, a tight-knit community deep in the rural forests of Northern California.

Those landlines, however, are what AT&T — the largest copper landline provider in California — is pushing to retire nationwide.

As California’s largest “carrier of last resort,” AT&T is required by law to provide basic phone service, typically copper landlines, to any Californian who asks for it, with lower-income customers qualifying for a discount. It provides 75% of the state’s last-resort phone service, accounting for about 500,000 Californians and 5% of all its California customers.

Subsidies to support copper landlines have declined sharply. Critics say AT&T wants to shed them to avoid their billion-dollar annual cost and boost profits with lucrative services like fiber.

For the past two years, AT&T has tried unsuccessfully to bow out of that obligation in many areas of the state, spending heavily to influence state regulations and laws. This year, it spent at least $4.5 million on lobbying as it tried and failed to pass a bill that would have allowed AT&T to cut copper services in certain areas in exchange for agreeing to expand its fiber services. Its industry ally, USTelecom, assembled a “grassroots” coalition to support the legislation, with more than 80% of coalition members having ties to AT&T, CalMatters found.

The company’s efforts to shed copper landlines show no signs of stopping. An ongoing process by the utilities regulators seeks to determine key components of the carrier of last resort requirements. And Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, an Inglewood Democrat, told CalMatters she intends to revive the bill that died this year.

It’s unclear just how many Californians would be impacted if AT&T gets its way. A map AT&T submitted to California utilities regulators as part of a failed 2023 effort marked 1,133 towns across 53 of California’s counties, including rural communities such as Hacienda, as territories the company sought to withdraw from.

AT&T said it only wants to pull out of communities with multiple alternatives, such as wireless and fixed broadband. It argued it’s not cost-effective to maintain expensive copper lines for many of its customers, the number of which has dwindled over the years. Doing away with the obligation would free up money to invest in more advanced technologies, such as fiber optics, it said.

“No Californian will be left without reliable phone service in their homes, including 911 services,” said Terri Baca, vice president of legislative affairs at AT&T, at an April legislative hearing.

But critics say the reliability of those alternatives isn’t guaranteed, and that AT&T’s push would pad shareholders’ pockets at the expense of a lifeline for those communities, especially during power outages and natural disasters. Statewide, more than one million 911 calls are made each year over landlines, according to the state’s Office of Emergency Services.

If AT&T’s goal is to upgrade services, it should build them out before retiring copper, opponents argue.

“If they wanted to replace copper with fiber right now, there’s nothing stopping them,” said Phil Grosse, a Hacienda resident and the North Coast regional chair of the California Democratic Party’s rural caucus.

Phil Grosse looks for a cell signal in the Hacienda area of Sonoma County on Oct. 23, 2025. Photo by Chad Surmick for CalMatters

The debate has intensified in California in recent years, partly because it is a significant holdout in AT&T’s plan to abandon copper networks across the country.

Spokespeople for USTelecom, its coalition Californians for a Connected Future, and AT&T did not specify how they recruited coalition members or why most members had ties to AT&T. Instead, they sent general statements calling the state’s carrier of last resort obligation archaic.

“Our goal is to deliver the best possible experience to our customers, now and into the future,” said Megan Ketterer of AT&T.

Cara Duckworth, a spokesperson for USTelecom, told CalMatters “even if we answered all the questions I’m not sure we’d get a fair shake.”

“Many of our providers would love to no longer have to spend money maintaining old copper equipment and would much rather invest that money in next (generation) networks that better serve consumers,” she said.

Some rural Californians say they fear AT&T will eventually wear state lawmakers down to that goal.

“Rural communities don’t have the big money to compete with AT&T. That’s why we hire legislators to look out for us,” Grosse said in a June letter to state lawmakers.

‘Predictably unpredictable’

Kathy Yerger, 67, lives among redwoods so dense that wireless Internet providers have refused to service her Hacienda home.

“It would be like trying to find a golf ball in the sky,” she remembered one provider telling her. Another, upon learning her address, chuckled and told her “no, you are not on the list,” she said.

Although she has a cellphone, Yerger has learned not to rely on it.

“If I put the phone in the window and hope the stars line up and the trees don’t blow, yes I can (try to connect),” she said. “It’s predictably unpredictable.”

Like many of her neighbors, Yerger’s best — if not only — bet at communicating with the outside world is her copper landline. Even that line fails sometimes when water corrodes the old copper wires. But it’s still the most reliable option she has, especially during emergencies and natural disasters.

Hacienda resident Phil Grosse makes his way down single lane McPeak Road, past a fire warning sign that highlights the precarious nature of the living environment along the Russian River, in Sonoma County on Oct. 23, 2025. Photo by Chad Surmick for CalMatters

First: Phil Grosse studies emergency evacuation routes while meeting with Hacienda neighbors. Last: Historic flood levels are marked on a support beam on a bridge underneath Hacienda’s Westside Road in Sonoma County on Oct. 23, 2025. Photos by Chad Surmick for CalMatters

In Hacienda, frequent mudslides and floods during rainy winters have washed away homes, sparked power outages, and sometimes claimed lives. The 2020 Walbridge fire, which scorched more than 55,000 acres of Sonoma County, got within a quarter mile of Yerger’s house. The only notification was word of mouth from the local fire department deputies and a neighbor calling her landline, she said.

Few reliable alternatives remain during those disasters. Cellphone services, which many Californians rely on to receive emergency alerts, can quickly fail. Fiber optic lines, while more resilient, require backup power along the network and are expensive to install. Voice-over-Internet-Protocol phones, a landline alternative, depend on the internet and home electricity and thus fail during power outages.

The alternatives are so unreliable during emergencies that Hacienda residents created walking evacuation routes along the area’s ragged switchbacks. They set up their own walkie-talkie network, drilling weekly. They even discussed using bullhorns and sirens to alert each other if a wildfire comes through, Grosse said. The hope is to reach enough people for someone with a copper landline to call for help.

“There’s no copper fetish here,” Grosse said. “When a reliable alternative appears, I’d really be happy to give (it) up.”

A technology upgrade or a profit grab?

Underlying AT&T’s push to retire copper is money. Telecom companies previously received subsidies from state and federal governments for last-resort services, but those payments have been reduced or eliminated in recent decades. California, for example, reduced its subsidy fund from $400 million in 1996 to about $20 million currently, according to a USTelecom regulatory filing.

This leaves companies providing landlines with a larger share of the bill for maintaining such networks. For AT&T, that’s about $1 billion each year in California alone.Despite this, AT&T remains profitable. An October filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission showed a $9.7 billion profit so far this year. And fiber is one of its profit drivers, bringing in $2.2 billion, up nearly 17% from the same time last year.

“They’re looking for a way to boost profits,” said Ernesto Falcon, communications and broadband program manager for the California Public Advocates Office.“They can’t legally do that unless you get rid of (the carrier of last resort requirements).”

AT&T representatives have repeatedly insisted that the company’s efforts to pull out as a carrier of last resort are to modernize telecommunication. In public hearings, they promised that AT&T’s request would not threaten copper landlines in areas without other viable options.

So far, state regulators and lawmakers aren’t convinced.

The California Public Utilities Commission rejected a March 2023 petition by AT&T that would have allowed it to pull out copper lines only in service areas where customers have telephone service alternatives. The application claimed 99.7% of its customers had access to at least three alternatives, with 99.9% having access to at least two.

After the rejection, the company turned to the state Legislature, sponsoring bills to relinquish its obligation.

Last year, an AT&T-backed bill would have granted the company relief if it notified the commission of certain census blocks with no customers or with multiple phone service alternatives. The bill, authored by McKinnor, died without a hearing.

McKinnor reintroduced the measure as Assembly Bill 470 this spring. In its final form, the bill would have allowed AT&T to pull copper lines out of open spaces and “well served” areas — those with at least three other service providers — if it promised, among other requirements, to expand advanced fiber optics in six years to three times as many households as it is currently required to serve and to help its customers transition to other services.

The bill would have required the public utilities commission to map out well-served areas using the Federal Communications Commission’s National Broadband Map and the federal Broadband Equity Access and Deployment Program — both tools to measure internet, not telephone, connectivity. The map was criticized by opponents of the bill, including the California Public Advocate’s Office, as not being an accurate representation of coverage.

“This bill does not leave any customer behind. This isn’t about taking something away, it’s about ensuring that we have a plan to migrate Californians to superior services,” Baca said in a July hearing.

McKinnor told CalMatters the measure was her “out of the box, progressive” way to get AT&T to pay for infrastructure upgrades instead of spending taxpayer dollars.

First: A sign for McPeak Road is tacked onto a utility pole. Last: A Cal Fire emergency coordination map, which shows structures located in the Hacienda area, hangs in the window of Frank Patane’s barn in Sonoma County on Oct. 23, 2025. Photos by Chad Surmick for CalMatters

But critics say some areas, such as Hacienda, could count as well served while still lacking quality access. There’s no guarantee that other providers would offer reliable alternatives, and the legislation would not have required the fiber buildout to be in the same communities where AT&T seeks to pull out, they said. Many Hacienda households are listed on the federal broadband map as having four internet providers available — none of which are reliable, they said.

“I agree we need to have technology, but only to a point where you are not dropping service for people that are dependent on it,” said Kelli Mathia, immediate past president of the Odd Fellows Recreation Club in Guerneville, down the Russian River from Hacienda.

If AT&T is really trying to upgrade services, why must they pull out copper lines first? Halliday wondered.

But McKinnor said allowing AT&T to preemptively pull the lines is only fair.

“I believe in free enterprise,” she told CalMatters. “I can’t mandate a business to spend billions of dollars doing infrastructure and say, ‘Oh, maybe we will give you (the relief) at the end.’”

AT&T’s real goal is to boost its bottom line, said Regina Costa, a Hacienda resident and telecom policy director for The Utility Reform Network, which led opposition to the bill.

“What they really want is to get rid of customers that they do not think are profitable,” she said.

In a shareholder meeting last year, AT&T CEO John Stankey said getting customers off of copper lines allowed the company to “turn down” that service in “low utilization” and “low profitable” territories. “I can turn out the lights, walk away, take cost out of business,” he said.

AT&T’s web of connections

AT&T is already a political juggernaut in Sacramento.

Between 2015 and 2024, AT&T made nearly $3 million in campaign contributions to state lawmakers, according to an analysis of CalMatters’ Digital Democracy database. This year, it contributed nearly $300,000 to lawmakers’ campaign accounts as they considered its sponsored legislation, data from the California secretary of state’s office shows.

AT&T also reported giving five California lawmakers and two of their staffers $300 tickets to Mexican singer Ana Gabriel’s Sacramento concert on the day the bill died in the Senate Appropriations Committee. The five, all Democrats, were Sen. Susan Rubio of West Covina and Assemblymembers Mark Gonzalez, of Los Angeles; José Solache, of Lakewood; Juan Carrillo, of Palmdale; and Blanca Rubio, of West Covina. All voted for AB 470 this year, with Assemblymember Rubio voting for early iterations of the bill but not casting a floor vote.

Spokespeople for all five lawmakers told CalMatters that AT&T’s gifts did not sway their decision and that they supported the bill on merit.

The company spent another $4 million lobbying state lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration about the bill this year, including $2 million spent between April and June, making it the company’s most expensive lobbying quarter in California in 20 years. It spent an additional $354,000 lobbying the utilities commission to influence the state’s carrier of last resort rules and policies around telephone companies’ service quality standards.

AT&T is so powerful in Sacramento, Grosse said, that some legislative aides told him in the past he would not win in a fight against the company.

“The (party’s) rural caucus can go ahead and they can talk to legislators, but AT&T is spending so much money on elections you are not going to prevail,” he recalled being told.

On its face, AB 470 had widespread support this year from Californians for a Connected Future, a recently formed coalition of more than 150 disability advocates, chambers of commerce, tribes, community service organizations, local officials and small businesses, including a construction company and a tennis shop. For months, dozens of those groups testified in public hearings and signed identical letters urging lawmakers to pass the bill, arguing it would incentivize modern technologies and ensure more reliable coverage.

The coalition, which describes itself as “grassroots,” also states it is a “project of USTelecom.” Rhonda Johnson, AT&T’s executive vice president of federal regulatory relations, sits on the trade group’s board. USTelecom received $250,000 from AT&T to lobby on its behalf this year, and also spent between $85,200 and $106,000 running ads on Facebook supporting the bill in the coalition’s name, according to a CalMatters tally.

It’s a prevalent practice commonly known as “astroturfing,” when corporations or trade groups enlist seemingly unaffiliated organizations for the appearance of grassroots support, said Jack Pitney, politics professor at Claremont McKenna College.

“If you don’t read the fine print, you’ll assume that … there are a lot of organizations that sincerely support this legislation.”

Lobbyists and other visitors gather in the rotunda of the state Capitol during the end of session in Sacramento on Sept. 12, 2025. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters

While the coalition often bragged about the scale and diversity of its membership, more than 80% of member organizations have ties to AT&T, CalMatters found.

Some of those groups have AT&T’s top leaders serving on their board of directors. That includes AT&T president Susan Santana, who sits on the board of the California Chamber of Commerce. Ben Golombek, the chamber’s chief of staff for policy, most recently served as the west region vice president for public affairs for AT&T. Other AT&T executives, mostly directors of external affairs, double as board members of various local chambers, business groups, foundations and voting rights groups.

AT&T also pays to be a member of many local chambers of commerce, many of whom support the bill. Of the 28 chambers in support, AT&T is listed as a corporate member of 26 of them.

Dozens of coalition members list AT&T as a key funder. The California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce calls AT&T an “invaluable” partner. Groups such as the Concerned Black Men of Los Angeles, which provides mentorship to Black local residents, list the company as a sponsor.

Others, including tribes, youth service groups and senior advocates, have partnered with the company in its $5 billion effort to “bridge the digital divide” nationwide, distributing free laptops donated by AT&T, hosting “connected learning centers” the company set up across the state to offer free digital access or receiving grants from AT&T to address digital inequity.

The telecom giant has also sponsored events for some coalition members, from golf tournaments for the San Gabriel Valley Conservation Corps to the 70th anniversary gala of Society for the Blind.

The financial support can make it hard not to align with AT&T, Pitney said.

“If AT&T has supported you in a material way, you want to make sure that support continues,” he said. “You are likely to look favorably on requests from that organization.”

CalMatters reached out to all organizations and people named in this story for comment. Most did not respond. California Chamber of Commerce spokesperson John Myers said it supported the bill because it made “economic sense.” Lauren Oto, a spokesperson for the California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce, said the group supported the AT&T-backed bill because “it represents a key opportunity for our members to see that technology is being used to improve public safety and expand access to communication.”

Norma Quiñones, executive director of the San Gabriel Valley nonprofit, told CalMatters AT&T’s sponsorship had nothing to do with the group’s support for the legislation. But the nonprofit offers job training to youths, she said, and AT&T is a prospective employer. While acknowledging not knowing much about the bill, she said it would help close the digital divide and expand high-speed internet access to underserved communities like the ones she serves.

“I wanted to build the relationship with AT&T and support their efforts,” she said. “It ultimately ties into our workforce development and our digital equity goals for our young people.”

The sway AT&T has worries residents like Grosse.

“One of the largest corporations in the world spent (millions of) dollars lobbying on this thing,” he said. “Do you really think it’s in the public’s interest?”

Regulatory change on the horizon?

If potential legislation doesn’t beat them to it, California utility regulators are expected to decide the future of California’s carrier of last resort obligations over the coming months.

The California Public Utilities Commission is currently undertaking a rulemaking process that seeks to answer questions including who should be providing last resort service, what would count as sufficient coverage and under what circumstances companies could stop doing so.

USTelecom and AT&T have advocated for changing the requirement so AT&T can stop providing this service in all but “populated areas,” and eventually leave those as well.

“Customers will gain, not lose,” AT&T said in a September 2024 filing.