###

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

###

In his final year in office, Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to go after large investors buying and owning California housing — in the same week that President Donald Trump also took rhetorical aim at Big Landlord.

It’s an unlikely meeting of the minds of two political foes who, in a race to head off the electorate’s concerns about affordability, have landed upon the same populist message: Blame Wall Street.

Newsom plans to say during his State of the State address to lawmakers on Thursday that he wants to work with them to regulate the practice of investors buying up large stocks of housing to rent out, forcing California residents to compete with them to afford buying a home, according to the governor’s office.

Proposals could include “enhanced state oversight and enforcement and potential changes to the state tax code,” according to the governor’s office.

“When housing is treated primarily as a corporate investment strategy, Californians feel the impact,” a source in the office said. “Prices go up, rents rise, and fewer people have a chance to buy a home.”

That sounds similar to a proposal Trump made on his social media platform Truth Social on Wednesday. The two previously closely aligned on policy related to clearing of homeless encampments.

“I am immediately taking steps to ban large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes,” the president wrote, sending stock prices of major publicly traded residential investment firms plummeting. He urged Congress to put the proposal into law and promised to unveil additional housing policy proposals at the World Economic Forum summit in Davos, Switzerland later this month.

Newsom is stopping short of calling for an outright ban on institutional investors’ ownership, though the source said he will seek to “curb” it with the goal of making home ownership more affordable for California residents.

He hasn’t yet proposed anything concrete. Whatever Newsom seeks to do, he’ll need the approval of the state Legislature.

Trump, for his part, did not offer any details about his proposal, such as how institutional investors would be defined under the proposed law or why he targeted single-family homes in particular. The White House’s press office did not respond to an email with those questions.

The twin announcements come after years of long-shot efforts by California progressives to address a surge in companies buying up single-family housing stock in the wake of the Great Recession. The issue has been the subject of renewed anxiety in post-fire Los Angeles, where a recent report by RedFin showed investors (loosely defined as any buyer with a name that includes “LLC,” “Inc” or “Corp”) have purchased 27 of 61 burned vacant lots that sold in Altadena — more than 40%.

Asked about that report in an interview on MS Now this week, Newsom said he had signed an executive order last year seeking to protect homeowners who find it too expensive to rebuild from falling for “predatory” lowball offers for their properties. But he acknowledged “the broader market conditions are challenging.”

The proposals mark new territory for Newsom’s housing affordability platform. The governor, now in his final year in office, has spent most of the past seven years focused on boosting construction. It’s a pivot toward populism for the governor, who is widely expected to run for president in 2028.

Blaming deep-pocketed investors for the nation’s housing woes has become an increasingly ideological-spanning exercise in recent years, with politicians as diverse as New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vice President J.D. Vance championing the cause.

Shortly after Trump’s post, Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio, an enthusiastic supporter of the president, promised to introduce legislation in his own post on X.

Is this actually a problem in California?

Many housing industry professionals, economists and policy researchers are skeptical.

“It’s really hard to buy a house right now so people are looking for someone to blame for that, but I think (institutional investors) are more of a symptom of the affordability crisis than they are a perpetuator of it,” said Caitlin Gorback, a University of Texas at Austin economist who has studied investors’ effect on local real estate markets.

Research on the topic is mixed, though most analyses have found that by taking owner-occupied homes and converting them into rentals, these companies tend to increase the supply of rentals. That puts downward pressure on rents, while taking away purchasable homes, leading to higher prices.

Fewer than 3% of all single-family homes in the state are owned by companies that own at least 10 properties.

That also takes away opportunities for would-be homeowners to buy a coveted single-family home. But even that comes with an under-appreciated upside, said Gorback: They provide more priced-out renters the opportunity to live in single-family homes — typically in wealthier, whiter and higher-resourced neighborhoods — something historically reserved for those who can afford to buy.

While apartment buildings are commonly owned and managed by large financial companies, single-family rentals weren’t seen as Wall Street-worthy money-making opportunities until the aftermath of the Great Recession. Since then, companies like Invitation Homes, Blackstone, Progress Residential and AMH Homes have typically focused on markets with relatively low prices and rapidly growing populations.

That doesn’t describe California. As a result, larger investors — however defined — make up a relatively small share of single-family landlords in the state. Fewer than 3% of all single-family homes in the state are owned by companies that own at least 10 properties, according to an analysis by the California Research Bureau, which conducts research for state lawmakers. A mere 20,066 are owned by firms with portfolios of 1,000 units or more. The largest of those owners is Invitation Homes, which owns over 11,000 homes in the state and reached a settlement with Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office last year over allegations it price-gouged tenants and illegally raised rents on more than 1,900 properties.

There are more than 16 million rental units across the state, according to Census data.

Though attacking big monied investors for the high cost of housing is a “huge distraction,” it has obvious political appeal, said Stan Oklobdzija, a UC Riverside public policy professor. “Attacking institutional investors is the latest iteration of appearing to do something without actually doing anything. …It’s just kind of archetypical cheap talk.”

For nearly a decade, Democrats in the state Legislature have proposed bills to track or ban the practice. Former Gov. Jerry Brown in 2018 vetoed a bill to create a registry of institutional investors that own 100 or more single-family homes, noting that “collecting the data would not stop the purchase of these homes by private investors.”

In 2024, lawmakers proposed banning investors that own at least 1,000 single-family homes from buying more houses and renting them out, prohibiting institutional investors from buying single-family homes for any reason and banning developers from selling entire new single-family subdivisions to investors to rent. All three bills died in committees.

Assemblymember Alex Lee, author of the first proposal, revived the bill last year. It passed the Assembly and awaits a hearing in a Senate committee.

Lee, a Democratic Socialist who has long critiqued the role of big money in the state’s real estate market, said he was “flabbergasted” to find himself on the same page with Trump, whom he described as a “far-right fascist.” Though he expressed doubts that the Trump administration would follow through with the promises the president made in his social media post, he said that “Democrats need to wake up to this populist, but righteous, position.”

“We can’t let the far-right capture the housing positions that the people care about,” Lee said.

Newsom evidently agrees.

###

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

###

The California Privacy Protection Agency kicked off 2026 by launching a tool that state residents can use to make data brokers delete and stop selling their personal information.

The system, known as the Delete Request and Opt-out Platform, or DROP, has been in the works for years, mandated by a 2023 law known as the Delete Act. Under it and previous laws, data brokers must register with the state and enable consumers to tell brokers to stop tracking them and selling their information.

Until now, those instructions had to be delivered to each data broker individually — not an easy feat, given that more than 500 brokers were registered in the state as of the end of last year. Making things even more difficult, some brokers obscured their opt-out forms from search results, as The Markup and CalMatters revealed in August.

The new system delivers privacy instructions to every registered broker at once. Launched on January 1, it is open to all California residents. By law, the hundreds of data brokers registered with the state must begin processing those requests in August.

Here’s how to take advantage of it.

Finding your advertising IDs

DROP asks you to provide some basic information — your name, email address, phone number, and zip code — so data brokers can find you in their systems. You can submit the form with just this information, but if you’d like a more thorough deletion, you can also provide your mobile advertising IDs from your phones, smart TVs, and vehicles. Including these IDs can help brokers match more of your data, but you have to take the time to collect them.

Click here to jump ahead if you want to provide basic information only, or continue reading for instructions on providing mobile advertising IDs for:

• Android phones and tablets
• Apple iPhones and iPads
• Vehicle ID numbers and smart TVs
• Personal computers

Android phones and tablets

The steps below may vary slightly depending on your device and operating system version, but the general process is the same:

• Open Settings.
• At the top of the Settings screen, select the menu option with your name, followed by “Google services and preferences.”
• Select the All services tab.
• Scroll to the Privacy & Security section, and select Ads. Scroll to the bottom of that screen to get your advertising ID, which will look like a string of random numbers and letters separated by four hyphens. Save that ID for the DROP form.

Finding the mobile advertising ID on Android. Miles Hilton / CalMatters

• On the same screen, you can find options to reset or delete your advertising ID. The CCPA suggests resetting your ID “because it breaks the persistent tracking link that advertisers, data brokers, and apps use to build long-term behavioral profiles of your device.” Alternatively, deleting the ID should prevent ID-based data tracking from happening at all.

Apple iPhones and iPads

Apple doesn’t provide a way for iOS users to see their mobile advertising ID, which it calls the Identifier for Advertisers, or IDFA. But it does provide a way for users to prevent trackers from accessing these IDs.

To turn off tracking, first, adjust your Screen Time settings:

• Open Settings.
• Scroll down and select Screen Time.
• Scroll down and select Content & Privacy Restrictions.
• Scroll down and select Allow Apps to Request to Track.
• Select Don’t Allow Changes.

Then, adjust your Tracking settings:

• Open Settings.
• Scroll down and select Privacy & Security.
• Select Tracking.
• Toggle OFF the option to Allow Apps to Request to Track.

Apple has its own ads system that doesn’t use an IDFA. To disable that:

• Open Settings.
• Scroll down and select Privacy & Security.
• Scroll down and select Apple Advertising.
• Toggle OFF the Personalized Ads option.

A quick note for our technically savvy readers: If you’ve already turned tracking off, you might be tempted to turn it back on to look up your advertising ID using a third-party app, but it’s unnecessary. Re-enabling tracking will reset the ID, limiting its usefulness to data brokers — they can’t continue tracking data or delivering personalized ads using a device ID that no longer exists.

Vehicle ID numbers and smart TVs

Vehicles can track their owners in surprisingly invasive ways, and you can provide a vehicle’s identification number, or VIN, in case data brokers have that information. Where your VIN is will depend on the vehicle, but common places include on the dash on the driver’s side, or on a sticker in the jamb of the front passenger door. Your vehicle registration documents should also have your VIN listed.

Smart TVs also use advertising IDs. Here’s a guide that provides some settings for common brands. If the guide doesn’t cover your smart TV, try checking under its privacy or advertising settings. But be aware that this is different from numbers like the model code and serial number.

Personal computers

Laptop and desktop computers use unique identifiers to share data, but these are harder to find than mobile advertising IDs. Instead, you can turn off tracking, which will delete those IDs. (Turning tracking on again will generally reset the IDs.)

• On computers running Windows, you can turn off your advertising ID by going to Settings. Depending on your OS version, select Privacy or Privacy & security. Then select General, and adjust your settings there.
• On Mac computers, navigate to System Settings > Privacy & Security > Apple Advertising. Then, toggle off Personalized Ads.

The California Privacy Protection Agency also provides some of its own guidance on finding advertising IDs.

Verify your identity

Go to the DROP website. You’ll be asked to accept the terms of use and be directed to a page that asks you to prove you’re a California resident. There are two ways to do so, and you can’t change methods once you’ve selected one of them.

1. The system allows you to verify your identity using personal information through a system called the California Identity Gateway. If you select this option, you’ll be asked to provide some basic personal information, like a phone number, email address, California address, or your social security number. The gateway will use this information to attempt to verify your residency directly with the state. This option should be quick if you have an email address and phone number.
2. Alternatively, you can verify your identity to DROP using login.gov, a system that some federal and state agencies in the United States have adopted to allow residents to interact with government services. To sign up for a login.gov account, you’ll be asked to provide an email address, create a password, and provide photos of government-issued identification. After signing up and verifying your identity, you should be able to move on to the next step. This option might take a little more effort than the first option, since ID is required, but might be faster if you’ve already signed up for an account for other purposes.

Fill out and submit the DROP form

After verifying your identity, you’ll get to a form where you can submit multiple versions of your name, up to three zip codes, up to three email addresses, up to three phone numbers, advertising IDs from your mobile devices and smart TVs, and VINs for your vehicles. You’ll be asked to verify your email addresses and phone numbers with single-use codes before submitting. (The agency notes there may be delays with some verification codes due to high volume.)

A form on California’s DROP website. CalMatters

Once you submit the form, you’ll get a unique DROP ID to check the status of your request.

What happens now?

Sit back and wait. While the window for making DROP requests has opened, data brokers registered with the state aren’t required to handle them just yet. On August 1, brokers will begin processing the requests.

Starting then, companies have 45 days to process requests and 90 days to report back on how they handled requests. If they fail to do so, the companies can face financial penalties.

In the meantime, you can monitor the status of your request with your DROP ID. At some point later in the year, when you log in the system should tell you whether your data was successfully deleted, whether records on you weren’t found, or whether companies believed the data was exempt from deletion under the law, which provides some limited ways for brokers to hold on to data.

If you find more information while you’re waiting for your request to be processed, like a new mobile advertising ID, you can update your request with that information, increasing the odds you’ll successfully get your data deleted.

Janice Gale McCann passed peacefully into God’s presence on December 31, 2025, at the age of 76, in her Arcata home, where she wanted to be, surrounded by her children, grandchildren and her husband of 54 years.

Janice, the youngest of three girls, was born in Pomona, California, on November 5, 1949, to Robert and Rosemary Austill and moved with her family to Pleasanton, California, where she lived until she came to Humboldt State College. From an early age, she wanted to be a teacher. During her college years, she spent her summers working for the Recreation Department in her hometown, actively engaging with children. She also volunteered as a tutor while in college. She spent her junior year studying abroad in France and then toured Europe before returning home. Upon receiving her teaching credential, she taught elementary school in Freshwater for two years. While in college, Janice joined SPURS, a national honor and service group; sang in the college choir; and was a member of Campus Christian Fellowship. It was in this fellowship group that she met her future husband, Charles McCann.

Janice and Charles were married on June 12, 1971, the day after she graduated from college. She kept the promise she had made to her parents not to marry until she had graduated (because they were paying for her education). As children came, Janice put her teaching career on hold and focused her outstanding talents on her family. She was very active with her children, both in school as a classroom volunteer, as a member of the booster clubs, and by following them in sports and the band. She spent countless hours in the stands, rooting them on at baseball, softball, basketball, track and soccer games. She was a good athlete in her own right, playing church-league softball and volleyball for many years. She also consistently outperformed her husband on their frequent bowling dates.

She loved camping with her family, taking many trips over the years to Lake Selmac, Trinity Lake and many other state campgrounds in Oregon and California. She enjoyed watching her grandchildren in all their endeavors as well, attending all the dance recitals and many games across the various sports they played. Janice was creative and loved to have fun. She made every family gathering a hit with her crafts, fun foods, love for games and, most of all, her scavenger hunts. Janice cherished her loving friends, nicknamed “the M&Ms,” a community of women who faithfully did life together from the time they were young moms, to becoming grandmothers, to the many card games played in retirement.

She was purposeful and intentional in preparing her children, in practical ways, for the world beyond home. She taught them the skills of meal planning, baking, cooking, housekeeping, laundry, sewing, gardening, yard care and more. They learned to run a household and gained confidence as they entered adulthood. She even made sure each of them had their own toolbox, stocked with the tools and the knowledge to use them, before they left home.

When her youngest child began attending school, she returned to the classroom. This time, though, she served as a teacher’s aide at Arcata Elementary and Sunny Brae Middle School. Helping students one-on-one or in small groups brought her great joy. One of her duties was serving as a lunchroom monitor, and the students nicknamed her Mrs. Pickles because, when offered, she enjoyed eating the pickle slices that many of them would not.

Janice had excellent planning and organizational skills. These skills came into play when Charles became the Youth Pastor at Arcata First Baptist Church and began leading short-term youth mission trips to Baja, Mexico, to serve in orphanages. Janice planned menus, purchased all necessary food supplies, organized kitchen crews and supervised the feeding of 25 to 75 youth and adults for a week as they joined these work crews. She played a critical role in the success of these trips.

Janice was a great gift to her family, her friends and countless students whom she taught. She had a servant’s heart, was thoughtful and showed her love by her actions. Her quiet, determined love and caring spirit will be cherished by her husband, Charles McCann, and her children: Jennifer and her husband, Jason; Carrie Kelly and her husband, Justin; Shawn McCann and Erin McCann. She will be remembered affectionately by her seven grandchildren, Maddison, Jackson and Bailey Kelly, Harper and Wyatt Jones and Kaleb and Asha. Janice was preceded in death by her infant daughter, Angela McCann, her nephew, Peter Schmidt, her father, Robert Austill, her mother, Rosemary Olson and her sisters Judy King and Linda Keeton. A special thanks to the nurses and other caregivers at Providence St Joseph Hospital who lovingly cared for Janice in her final days, and to the outstanding staff at Hospice of Humboldt who displayed extraordinary sensitivity to Janice and her family.

A Celebration of Life service will be held at 2 p.m. on Saturday, January 17th at Arcata First Baptist Church, 1700 Union Street, Arcata. Reception to follow. In lieu of flowers, please donate to St Jude Children’s Research Hospital — stjude.org/givehope.

Danny Lee Taylor passed away December 1, 2025 at his home in McKinleyville, California, at the age of 75. Danny was born on December 10, 1949 at the old Trinity Hospital in Arcata, California, to George Delbert Taylor and Bernice Alice (Helm) Taylor. Danny grew up in Arcata and graduated from Arcata High School in 1968. After high school, he decided to enlist in the U.S. Army in January of 1969, during the Vietnam War. He enlisted on the Buddy System with his buddy, Dan Good. Danny was discharged in January of 1971 and returned home to Arcata.

During high school, Danny started working for our Grandpa, George “Dub” Taylor, at Elgar’s Service Station in Blue Lake. That job enabled him to buy his first car, a teal green 1956 Chevy. After his discharge from the Army, Danny worked at Maxon’s Music, and eventually opened his own music store, Tallman’s Pianos and Organs in Eureka. Danny was musically gifted and enjoyed playing the trumpet, French horn, trombone, guitar, piano and organ. Danny also had a beautiful voice and our mother instilled a love for singing in all of us. We sang everywhere we went and Danny sang in every church choir throughout his life.

Danny returned to College of the Redwoods and obtained his EMT II certificate. In 1972, while attending CR, he met his lifelong friend, Doug Bittle, who invited him to church. Danny’s lifelong relationship with Jesus Christ began at Full Gospel Tabernacle, now Eureka the Pentecostal Church, in 1972. It was at church that Danny met Terry Lee Schmedding, the love of his life. They were happily married on July 22, 1974, and soon purchased their first home on Huntoon Street in Eureka, where they resided until 1986.

In 1986, Danny and Terry moved to Phoenix, where Danny completed his LVN. Sadly, after residing in Phoenix for seven years, Terry passed away from Lou Gehrig’s disease. Danny worked for Maricopa County Hospital and was instrumental in organizing the incarceration unit that provided medical care to inmates from five prisons in the Phoenix area. Danny supervised all incarceration units, including orthopedic, maternity, dental, and cardiac, until he retired in 2010. Danny moved back to Arcata in 2016.

Danny was a dedicated, steadfast, courageous and loving son, brother, uncle and husband. He was an anointed Sunday School teacher, supported foreign missions and loved working for the Lord.

Danny was preceded in death by his wife, Terry Taylor, and his parents, George “Del” Taylor and Bernice Taylor. Danny is survived by his sister, Georgette (Steven) Trump, his brother, Dale (Judy) Taylor, his aunt Deborah Jimenez, nieces Serena (Rene) Ontiveros, Alicen (Eddie) Adams, Vanessa (Shayne Downs) Taylor, Holly (Alex) Bateman, nephews Todd (Anamarie) Taylor, Lawrence (Melonie) Trump III, and great nieces and nephews Michaelyn, Gabriel, Nevaeh, Shaina, Ruby, Brylee, Barrett, Lawson, Harmony, and Chase, and numerous cousins.

A funeral service will be held at Eureka the Pentecostal Church, 1060 Hoover Street, Eureka, on Friday, January 16, 2026 at 1:30 pm. A reception will follow the graveside burial at the church. The Mad River Honor Guard will assist in the graveside service at Greenwood Cemetery in Arcata at 3 p.m. on January 16, 2026.

Danny’s family would like to offer our heartfelt thanks and appreciation to his five amazing caregivers, Paula, Elizabeth, Demetria, Melissa and Paulette. Without all of you, we could never have kept him at home, which was his wish. Our thanks and appreciation also goes to Vynca Telehealth, Compasses Home Healthcare and Hospice of Humboldt.

In lieu of flowers, donations in Danny’s name may be made to the Junior Youth Camp Fund at Eureka the Pentecostal Church, or to the charity of your choice.

###

Despite public concerns about increased police surveillance, the Eureka City Council on Tuesday unanimously approved the Eureka Police Department’s request to research the use of drone technology to assist the department during critical incidents. 

Speaking at last night’s meeting, EPD Chief Brian Stephens emphasized that the proposal is “just to begin research” to get a better idea of what kind of drone technology is out there and how much it might cost. Once the research is complete, EPD will develop a drone-use policy that will be reviewed by the city council, the Community Oversight on Police Practices (COPP) board and the city’s independent police auditor.

“The benefits of this [drone technology] for the EPD are significant,” Stephens said. “They offer rapid deployment capabilities and increased effectiveness across a wide range of emergency and investigative responses.  … For the Eureka Police Department to meet the expectations of our community, we need to be equipped with the tools and technology that allow us to respond effectively, share critical information and keep both our officers and residents safe. When we fail to invest in technology, we’re not just limiting innovation — we’re limiting safety.”

EPD has borrowed drones from other local law enforcement agencies over the years during “exigent circumstances,” including an incident that had occurred earlier that day involving a missing 10-year-old.

Stephens | Screenshot

“We have prior experience with this particular individual, who was found near the water before,” Stephens explained, noting that the report came in about an hour after the child was last seen. “We contacted the sheriff’s department because we knew we needed to clear a large portion of the trail system. Utilizing a drone, we were able to fly everything north of the Samoa Bridge, all the way out to Brainard and clear that property without having to send officers out there to do it on foot.”

It turned out the kid wasn’t out on the trail at all, Stephens said. A community member contacted police after spotting the 10-year-old walking somewhere in town. “We were able to find him in short order and got him back to his mom safely,” he said. “So that’s just an example [from] today of how [drones can be], as we say, a force multiplier.”

EPD has also used other agencies’ drones during standoff situations with barricaded suspects and to assist in negotiations during mental health crises involving potentially armed individuals or people who are threatening to hurt themselves. A little over a year ago, the department used a drone to communicate directly with a distraught person who was threatening to jump off the Eureka water tower. 

Councilmember Leslie Castellano asked if EPD had encountered challenges in borrowing drones from other agencies. Stephens said HCSO and others have been “very receptive” and “very considerate in their ability to help,” but noted that it isn’t sustainable to rely on other agencies.

“Their pilots and their equipment oftentimes are spread throughout the county,” he said. “The real constraints we have [is] just the turnaround from when we make the request and [when] we can get the equipment on scene and start utilizing it for what the purpose of the mission is. That’s where we really have the potential to run into issues.”

Councilmember G. Mario Fernandez, who attended the meeting via Zoom, asked what the research process would entail. Stephens said staff would probably ask other local agencies what kind of drone technology they’re using and look into potential cross-training. 

“In addition to that, after we get that settled, then we would know that we have a price point that we’d have to meet to get the equipment and assets that we need to run a program,” Stephens continued. “Then we look at the funding options for that, and then we would start creating the policy which … would probably come from the company we use, but we’d also lean on our independent police auditor, because they already have agencies that they are working with that have policies in place.”

Responding to a follow-up question about the estimated timeframe for research, Stephens emphasized that he doesn’t want to rush the process.

“I would hate to try to even put a timeline on it because that would rush information that we’re trying to obtain,” he said. “I don’t want to rush this process because when I bring back something for both review by the COPP board and then, hopefully, to council, I want to make sure it’s a tight package of information that I know will be able to answer the questions and concerns that both council and the community have.”

It turns out, the public had many concerns.

The vast majority of the two dozen residents who spoke during the public comment portion of the discussion urged the council to vote against the proposal out of concern that it would increase citywide surveillance and inevitably lead to misuse. A few skeptical speakers expressed interest in researching the use of drones, and only two people explicitly stated that they were in favor of the proposal.

“As an adult on the autism spectrum, if I was having a crisis and I needed mental health support, I don’t like the idea of being approached by a drone, but I would prefer it over being approached by an armed officer,” said one speaker who chose not to identify themselves. “I would like to ask you to vote ‘yes’ to allow research.”

Eureka resident Kylie Finch acknowledged that drones can be used in productive ways, reiterating a couple of examples provided by Stephens earlier in the meeting. However, Finch emphasized that the technology can be abused, pointing to the New York City Police Department’s use of drones to spy on backyard Labor Day parties and a case in her hometown where a disgruntled police chief allegedly used a drone to stalk his ex-girlfriend.

Finch | Screenshot

“I realize this is a request to do further research, but … it seems the reason for this request is not [out of] necessity as much as convenience,” Finch said. “Convenience invites misuse. … The ultimate safeguard against misuse is to instead borrow these devices from the county when we need them in exigent circumstances [and] only for routine policing purposes. This system isn’t broken, but this proposal suggests a great way to break it.”

Another speaker, who did not identify themselves, worried about the potential for drone footage to be leaked or accessed by other agencies. They pointed to previous reporting by the Outpost’s Ryan Burns, which found that HCSO had violated its own policy in allowing outside law enforcement agencies to access information collected by the county’s automated license plate reading cameras, supplied by Atlanta-based police technology company Flock Safety.

The speaker claimed that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has “come out in opposition to these rapidly expanding police drone programs,” but that’s not entirely true. The ACLU states on its website that “drones equipped with facial recognition software, infrared technology, and speakers capable of monitoring personal conversations would cause unprecedented invasions of our privacy rights.” However, the ACLU also acknowledges that “drones have many beneficial uses, including in search-and-rescue missions, scientific research [and] mapping.” 

Some speakers worried that they could be deployed at public events, like Eureka’s Friday Night Market or the Kinetic Grand Championship. Others felt the city should use the resources that would be spent on drone research to address “the root causes of mental health crises, such as poverty and lack of access to health care, mental health services, secure housing and livable wages.”

After public comment, Councilmember Bauer made a motion to approve the proposal for the sake of discussion. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Kati Moulton.

Councilmember Castellano acknowledged the community’s concerns around the issue, but felt the “Pandora’s Box” of police surveillance “has already been opened.” With that in mind, Castellano said the city has an opportunity to create a “forward-thinking” policy that is informed by community input.”

Castellano | Screenshot

“Overuse [of this technology] does exist, and there’s nothing now that would keep that from happening in Humboldt County or in the City of Eureka,” she said, noting that the Federal Aviation Administration oversees domestic drone practices. “The City of Eureka, having its own policy and system, would allow, I think, greater accountability [for] data collection. That being said, I think that there should be strict limits. … Drones do have a chilling effect on democracy and the experience of freedom, and … I value the sanctity of freedom and … I don’t want the use of drones to, as citizens spoke [earlier], limit or hinder that.”

The rest of the council agreed that drones could be used in nefarious ways, but felt there should be more research into the topic before it makes a determination on whether or not EPD should have drones in its arsenal.

After a bit of additional discussion, the council approved EPD’s request in a 5-0 vote.

Resolution Opposing Military Involvement in Venezuela

During the non-agenda public comment period, the council heard from about a dozen anti-war activists who urged the council to pass a resolution condemning the U.S. invasion of Venezuela and recent airstrikes on alleged drug boats. A resolution was placed on the council’s Dec. 16 agenda, but the meeting was canceled at the last minute due to a lack of quorum.

The proposed resolution — linked here — urges the federal government to “pursue diplomatic, humanitarian, and multilateral strategies to address political and economic challenges in Venezuela” and underscores the city’s opposition to “any United States military intervention or escalation of hostilities in Venezuela that is not explicitly authorized by Congress in accordance with the U.S. Constitution and the War Powers Resolution.” 

At last night’s meeting, the anti-war activists urged the council to agendize and approve the resolution as soon as possible. At least one of the speakers called on the council to adopt a resolution written by the Humboldt Anti-War Committee — linked here — which condemns “all types of aggression” against Venezuela, including recent airstrikes, “the seizure of Venezuelan oil facilities [and] the kidnapping of President [Nicolás] Maduro and his wife.”

“Our resolution was a good one,” said one speaker, who only identified themselves as Pat. “Your resolution, it included the fact that it would be okay if Congress declared war on Venezuela. That’s not what we’re talking about. That’s immoral, and that means you are immoral because you OK’d that resolution. … What we need to do is say, ‘We are against war with Venezuela’ because I’m ashamed of this country.”

The council did not respond to requests for the resolution to be agendized. The Dec. 16 meeting cancellation notice stated that “any items intended for consideration at the canceled meeting will be placed on a future agenda, as appropriate.”

###

The city council also received a report on upcoming housing needs in the city. Check LoCO tomorrow for a full report!

###

In the ongoing preliminary hearing hearing for Daryl Ray Jones, who stands accused of making terroristic threats to local schools and businesses last year, a former middle school girlfriend today took the stand and testified that Jones subjected her to years of harassment and death threats prior to his arrest.

The woman, who was identified in court as Jane Doe 2, said she and Jones attended Jacoby Creek Elementary School together and briefly dated when she was in seventh grade and he was in eighth.

Under questioning from Deputy District Attorney Roger Rees, Doe 2 said she and Jones went on to attend Arcata High School, where they were in “overlapping social circles” but did not hang out as much. Over the ensuing years, she said, Jones reached out a couple of times via Facebook Messenger, but in 2021 things took a turn.

In January of that year, Doe 2 received a voicemail from a male who said, “I’m going to kill your bitch ass,” she testified. There was sustained patterns of such threats over the next few years, she said, with more than 600 calls coming into her place of employment, North Point Consulting in Arcata. 

Doe 2 testified that Jones left her hundreds of messages — including voicemails, texts, emails and social media messages — and while she didn’t respond to most of them, one day, in the summer of 2021, she answered a call at work and briefly spoke with the caller. He identified himself as Daryl and said he’d been trying to reach her. 

From early 2021 through February of 2025, Jones called North Point Consulting more than 600 times; called Doe 2’s cell phone “dozens, maybe hundreds” of times, leaving “maybe two dozen voicemails”; and sent “a couple dozen texts,” with the messages coming from a variety of phone numbers, she testified. 

During one call to North Point Consulting, Jones told one of Doe 2’s coworkers that he wanted to speak with Doe 2 about consulting services. When asked for more information he gave the name of Jeremiah Anderson, according to today’s testimony. Doe 2 recognized the name as “somebody we both knew from back in the day,” adding later that Jones used to live with the Anderson family in Arcata.

The harassing behavior was reported to police in 2021 but the District Attorney’s Office declined to prosecute at the time, she said. As the calls persisted, accumulating into the hundreds, Doe 2 said she was profoundly affected. 

“It was extremely upsetting to me when he’d call,” she said, adding that sometimes the calls would “send me into a panic.” He would threaten her via voicemail, saying things like, “I’m going to kill you — you and your whole family” and “God won’t be on your side,” Doe 2 testified.

Her voice began to shake as she continued. “It really frightened me to the point where I couldn’t answer those calls,” she said. “It got to point where every time the phone rang, my heart was beating really fast … and I couldn’t concentrate.”

When the calls resumed early last year, Doe 2 said, “I was extremely just horrified that it was starting up again.” It felt “like reliving the nightmare” of 2021, and she was “scared it would never stop,” she testified. Some of the voicemails he left were strange, she said, starting with requests like, “Hey, call me back” but then ending with, “I can’t wait to kill this fucking bitch.”

Doe 2 said she’d heard that Jones was living in Oklahoma (police confirmed this in March of 2025, shortly before his arrest), but until he was locked up she remained concerned for her own safety and that of her coworkers.

Meagan O’Connell, supervising attorney with the county’s Conflict Council Office, is representing Jones in these proceedings. During cross-examination, O’Connell asked Doe 2 how familiar she was in seventh grade with such conditions as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Bipolar Disorder and schizophrenia. Doe 2 replied that she was aware of them but not an expert. 

O’Connell also asked questions about whether Doe 2 found Jones’s demeanor and messages strange.

“I found it scary,” she replied.

When this cross-examination was over, Rees said he had no additional witnesses or evidence for this hearing. Judge Timothy Canning then announced that the court will put off closing arguments to allow transcripts of the proceedings to be prepared. The next hearing date was scheduled for Feb. 11 at 8:30 a.m.

This preliminary evidentiary hearing is intended to lay the foundation for a jury trial. Canning said he will issue a holding order following oral arguments at the next hearing date, if appropriate.

UPDATE, 4:07 p.m.:

The Humboldt County Elections Office released its first post-election report this afternoon, and as expected, it doesn’t really alter the results. Scafani is still on track to beat back the recall effort.

Another 34 votes have been tallied in the latest count, bringing the ballot total to 387. Before those new votes came in, the recall effort was failing 44.19 percent to 55.81 percent; now it’s failing 44.96 percent to 55.04 percent. 

Humboldt County Registrar of Voters Juan Cervantes told the Outpost earlier today that he expects this to be the most substantial post-election report before he certifies this thing, which could happen within the next couple of weeks.

###

Original post:

PREVIOUSLY

• Blue Lake Recall Effort Falls Short for Two Council Members, But Election Will Proceed for Scafani

###

Elise Scafani, a Blue Lake city councilmember and the city’s backup mayor, has very likely survived a voter-initiated effort to recall her from office.

The “no” votes on the recall question account for just shy of 56 percent of the returns reported in the final Election Day tally. In all, 353 of the city’s 866 registered voters (40.8 percent) have had their ballots tallied thus far, with 156 calling for Scafani’s ouster versus 197 saying she should remain in office.

While there’s likely a handful of ballots left to tally, there’s no reason to believe that they’ll alter the results. A new rule from the U.S. Postal Service, which took effect on Christmas Eve, means that ballots dropped into mailboxes yesterday may not be postmarked until today or later. In California, ballots must be postmarked by Election Day to count.

The Blue Lake electorate has been bitterly divided over the past year. In May, a group of residents mounted a recall effort against three city council members — Scafani, Kat Napier and Mayor John Sawatzky — following the abrupt and unexplained exit of longtime City Manager Amanda “Mandy” Mager. 

Mager’s supporters believed she had been forced out by the council majority, though officially it was framed as a mutual agreement.

The recall effort required three distinct signature-gathering campaigns, one for each office-holder, and in the end proponents fell just short of the 250-voter threshold necessary to trigger elections for both Napier (four signatures shy) and Sawatzky (five shy).

###

DOCUMENT: Final Election Night Results