Saturday,
March 15, at the Humboldt County Fairgrounds in Ferndale. The BLM
will offer four halter-trained fillies and four burros that have not
been trained.
Anyone
interested can preview the horses and burros when they arrive at the
fairgrounds at about 4 p.m., Friday, March 14. Adoptions on a
first-come, first-served basis begin at 8 a.m. Saturday and continue
until 4 p.m. The adoption fee is $125 per animal.
The
animals are certified to be healthy and vaccinated against all common
equine diseases. Adopters must be at least 18 years old and have
facilities that meet the
BLM’s requirements. The adoption event is being held as part of
the Back Country Horsemen of California Redwood Unit’s Trail
Obstacle Challenge event.
The
BLM is responsible under the Wild Free Roaming Horses and Burros Act
for protecting and managing
wild horses and burros on public lands. The agency periodically
removes animals from the range
when populations exceed levels established to allow wild horse and
burro herds to thrive in balance
with other range users, including wildlife and permitted livestock.
These animals are then available
for adoption at events throughout the country. Visit the BLM’s wild
horse and burro program online
for more information.
A 9.5-megawatt floating wind turbine deployed at the Kincardine Offshore Wind project, located off the coast of Aberdeen, Scotland. Photo courtesy of Principle Power.
###
The future of Humboldt County’s offshore wind industry appears increasingly uncertain following mass layoffs at RWE and Vineyard Offshore, the multinational energy companies leading efforts to develop commercial-scale floating wind farms on the North Coast. The job cuts come in response to widespread market uncertainty following President Donald Trump’s efforts to ban offshore wind development in the United States.
In a regulatory filing submitted last week, RWE Offshore Wind Services, LLC confirmed its plans to cut dozens of jobs in its U.S. offshore wind division. Reached via email this morning, RWE spokesperson Ryan Ferguson told the Outpost that the company has laid off “close to 100 people,” including some California-based employees working on the Canopy Offshore Wind project planned for the Humboldt Wind Energy Area.
“Last year we announced that, due to market conditions and increased risk profile, we would delay certain expenditures related to our US offshore wind development projects,” RWE said in a prepared statement. “With the current regulatory and political environment, we have made the decision to reduce the scope of our development activities and the size of our US Offshore team. As RWE, we remain committed with our US business to advancing energy projects that meet rising energy demand, create jobs, and invest in communities.”
It remains unclear how many local employees have been laid off. The Outpost sought additional comment from 10 employees affiliated with the Canopy Offshore Wind project and received four bounce-back emails — including some from people who live here in Humboldt County — each stating that the employee’s “mailbox is no longer active.”
At the end of last month, Vineyard Offshore cut 50 U.S. and European positions, some of which were reassigned to other international projects. Vineyard Offshore spokesperson Kathryn Niforos shared the following statement:
Vineyard Offshore believes that offshore wind is a vital part of the nation’s future energy independence. Our projects will provide over 6 gigawatts of reliable and affordable energy to meet growing energy needs on the east and west coasts, while creating thousands of jobs and fueling economic growth. In an effort to position our projects for sustainable long-term success we have made the difficult decision to reduce our current team size in light of recent market uncertainties. We look forward to continuing to advance these transformative American energy projects in the years ahead.
Reached for additional comment on the recent layoffs, Chris Mikkelsen, executive director of the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District, said he remains “optimistic and focused on delivering a successful project,” referring to the Offshore Wind Heavy Lift Marine Terminal Project slated for the Samoa Peninsula.
“The District remains focused and optimistic about the development of the proposed heavy-lift marine terminal and our ability to provide facilities that support key state and federal government initiatives while maintaining a focus on our local values and people,” Mikkelson said.
On February 17, 2025, the Fortuna Police Department’s Problem Oriented Policing (POP) team conducted a sex
registrant compliance check operation within the City of Fortuna. These operations are a critical part of law
enforcement’s ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with legal requirements and to enhance public safety.
During the compliance check operation, officers contacted 49-year-old Jacob Roberts, a registered sex offender
residing within the Fortuna city limits. Roberts was found to be in violation of his probation terms and was
subsequently arrested. At the time of his arrest, officers seized his cellular device as evidence.
Following the initial arrest, on March 8, 2025, the Fortuna Police Department obtained a search warrant to
conduct a forensic examination of Roberts’ phone. The investigation revealed that Roberts was in possession of
child pornography. Fortuna Police detectives and officers responded to Roberts’ residence and confirmed that
he remained in custody at the Humboldt County Correctional Facility due to his prior probation violation.
Additional charges were filed, including:
California Penal Code 311.11(a)(1): Unlawful possession of obscene matter involving a person under
the age of 18
California Penal Code 1203.2: Probation Violation
The Fortuna Police Department remains committed to protecting the community from individuals who pose a
risk to public safety. We encourage community members to report any suspicious activity related to registered
sex offenders or any other crimes, which threaten public safety. Citizens with information are asked to contact
the Fortuna Police Department at (707) 725-7550.
We commend the dedication of the Fortuna Police Department’s POP team and detectives for their diligence in
conducting this compliance operation and follow-up investigation. Their commitment to public safety ensures
that those who violate the law are held accountable.
The Fortuna Police Department will continue to conduct proactive enforcement operations to safeguard our
community. We appreciate the ongoing support from the residents of Fortuna as we work together to maintain a
safe environment for all.
The
Humboldt County Administrative Office’s Economic Development
Division is updating the county’s Comprehensive Economic
Development Strategy (CEDS) and invites you to share your input by
taking the 2025 Humboldt CEDS Community Survey.
A
CEDS is a strategic plan that guides local economic development
efforts and ensures the county remains eligible for certain federal
grants. Once complete, the updated CEDS will serve as a roadmap for
building a diverse and thriving economy in Humboldt County.
The
state of Humboldt County’s economy impacts everyone who lives and
works in Humboldt. Input from the community is crucial to ensure the
updated CEDS meets the needs of Humboldt’s residents, business
owners and workforce.
The
collaborative process to update the CEDS is a unique opportunity for
the community to come together, share input on the economic
challenges Humboldt is facing and design a strategy for improvement.
By participating in the survey, community members can share their
perspectives on workforce development, infrastructure needs, housing,
industry trends and other critical factors that impact the local
economy.
How
to Participate
The
survey will be available online at gohumco.com/CEDS
until Sunday, March 16. Paper copies are also available and can be
filled out in person at the Humboldt County Administrative Office,
located in the Humboldt County Courthouse at 825 Fifth St., Suite
112, in Eureka.
Survey
results will help inform the county’s five-year economic
development plan and identify actionable strategies for inclusive
growth. The final CEDS report is scheduled to be submitted to the
U.S. Economic Development Administration and made available to the
public in May.
For
more information and background on the CEDS and how to share your
input please call 707-445-7745 or email gohumco@co.humboldt.ca.us.
For more information on Humboldt County’s Economic Development
Division, visit gohumco.com.
Insurance market problems highlighted by the Los Angeles-area fires have legislators rushing to offer up possible solutions. A house burned by the Eaton Fire in Altadena, Jan. 26, 2025. Photo by Jules Hotz for CalMatters
###
This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
###
The fires that reduced Altadena, Pacific Palisades and other Los Angeles-area neighborhoods to rubble have also shined a harsh light on California’s raging insurance crisis.
Lawmakers have proposed a variety of bills to address the issues illuminated by the disaster, plus others that predate it. Some of the legislation would be the first of its kind in the nation.
The fire-insurance provider of last resort
One measure would put the state’s top two lawmakers on the governing committee of the FAIR Plan, the association of insurance companies that’s required by law to provide fire insurance to property owners who can’t find it anywhere else.
The FAIR Plan said last month that it was at risk of running out of money due to claims from the LA fires and asked for a $1 billion lifeline. Its member insurance companies were on the hook for that amount, and could try to pass along up to half of the cost to their customers.
The plan has become more important over the past several years as insurance companies have stopped renewing or writing new policies in California, so state officials have a keen interest in its solvency and ability to serve a growing number of customers. But the plan is not run by the state, it is run by a management team that’s accountable to the pool of insurers.
Lawmakers hope that adding state officials to the group of people overseeing the FAIR Plan will help it run better and improve the lives of its customers.
“The association has grown to such an extent that its financial capacity to pay claims after a catastrophic fire is unlikely,” says Assembly Bill 234, a bill by Assemblymember Lisa Calderon, a Democrat from the Los Angeles area. “Increased transparency is imperative.”
Calderon’s bill calls for the speaker of the Assembly and the chairperson of the Senate Committee on Rules to immediately become non-voting members of the FAIR Plan’s governing committee. Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, who has limited authority over the plan, backs the bill. The FAIR Plan has not taken a position on the legislation, according to plan spokesperson Hilary McLean.
If the bill passes, California could be the first state to put lawmakers on a FAIR Plan board, although several states have insurance department representatives on boards for their own FAIR Plan equivalents, said Stephen Jablonski, president of Property Insurance Plans Service Office, a nonprofit that tracks state residual property insurance plans.
California’s FAIR Plan would not disclose the members of its governing board.
Concerns about the FAIR Plan go beyond its financial stability. As the fire insurance provider of last resort, issues surrounding the way it serves its customers have come up again and again. Placing state officials on the plan’s board could help address some of those issues.
In early February, Betty Ryder and her husband received a renewal notice for one policy on their Los Angeles-area home but not for their FAIR Plan policy, which is when they discovered that they did not have fire insurance on the property all of last year despite paying for it.
That meant the couple was uninsured at a time when their home was particularly vulnerable: Ryder and her husband live in Tujunga, a neighborhood that Ryder said was “right between the three fires” that burned in Los Angeles County earlier this year.
Ryder got on the phone with her broker, her mortgage company and a representative from the FAIR Plan to figure out what happened. The agent for the FAIR Plan told her the plan had incorrectly applied someone else’s payment to her account and that it canceled her policy after that realization.
So she started writing letters: to the president of the FAIR Plan, to Lara, to her mortgage company, to her broker.
“I was in tears,” she said. “We’re old, we’re in our 70s,” she added, referring to herself and her husband, William.
A week later, a representative from the FAIR Plan told her they found the correct check issued by her mortgage company last year, and that the amount has been applied to her reinstated policy. A relief, but there’s a remaining problem: The Ryders have already paid into their mortgage company’s escrow account for this year’s policy. They have not received a refund for the $5,300 check her mortgage company issued to the FAIR Plan last year, so as of now they have paid double for this year’s policy.
Ryder has not heard back from the FAIR Plan about a possible refund, nor has she received a response from Lara’s insurance department. The department said it has assigned someone to her case.
McLean said she would not discuss individual cases with CalMatters. “In the limited instances where the California FAIR Plan is regretfully in error, it works to correct the mistake in its customer’s favor,” McLean wrote in an email. “If the FAIR Plan receives a duplicate payment, the FAIR Plan will refund the duplicate payment with interest.”
But Lili Thompson, an account manager for an insurance agency in Chico, told CalMatters that the FAIR Plan often makes errors, and that she has customers who have had experiences similar to Ryder’s. When they do, it’s hard to get those issues resolved because it’s tough to get the plan to address problems in a timely manner, Thompson said.
“We don’t have access to billing information, which is constantly incorrect,” Thompson said. “Payments aren’t applied. Or there’s a balance of 3 cents, or $4 or $10, and they cancel (policies).”
In fact, Thompson submitted a complaint about the FAIR Plan to the Insurance Department in January. It read in part: “Our agency is having significant problems with the FAIR Plan as a whole. Issues with billing, renewals, cancellations have been reoccurring at an alarming rate.”
In an emailed response seen by CalMatters, an insurance department compliance officer urged Thompson to tell her clients to file complaints with the department “so we can address their specific situation.”
CalMatters wrote about similar complaints against the FAIR Plan — delays in payments, slow response times, poor customer service — about a year ago. At the time, McLean said the plan was dealing with increased volume and had hired more staff to deal with it all. She also mentioned that the FAIR Plan had transitioned to a new software system and insurance agents and brokers were still learning it.
Asked what the FAIR Plan has changed in the past year, and why the same types of complaints persist, McLean again pointed to the plan’s “historic growth over the past several years,” and mentioned that it has hired even more staff to deal with claims from the January Palisades and Eaton fires.
Another bill that addresses the FAIR Plan’s financial stability is Assembly Bill 226, aimed at allowing it to spread out claims payments over time. It would do that by allowing the FAIR Plan to obtain bond financing through the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank.
Assemblymember David Alvarez, co-author of the bill with Calderon and Democrat from Chula Vista, told CalMatters: “We wanted to make sure if there was an event of (the LA fires’) magnitude, insurance companies wouldn’t use that as a reason to not cover California.”
He added that this legislation is just another “tool” to “maintain insurers in California, and get claims paid in a way that doesn’t cost consumers.” Alvarez also noted that the bill, which was first introduced last year, had no opposition. The FAIR Plan supports it.
Paying claims without full inventories
Senate Bill 495, by Sen. Ben Allen, a Democrat from El Segundo, would make California the only state in the nation to require insurers to pay claims in full without first seeing itemized inventories from policyholders.
It also gives consumers at least 180 days, up from 60 days, to provide proof of loss to their insurance companies after a declared state of emergency.
“A lot of insurance companies have already been doing this,” the senator said in an interview with CalMatters. “It’s a hassle for them to go through all the (inventory) lists, too.”
Allen said he has been going to town halls in his LA-area community and hearing from “people who have lost everything.” Getting rid of the inventory requirement “really cuts out an important barrier for a lot of people especially during a very difficult moment,” he said.
Lara backs the bill, and last week his department released a list of insurance companies that have agreed to pay at least 75% of contents coverage without a detailed inventory. A majority of companies operating in the state have — with some agreeing to provide 100%.
Insurance industry representatives opposed a similar bill in the 2004-05 legislative session and plan to do so again. Rex Frazier, president of the Personal Insurance Federation of California, said the bill could raise costs for insurance companies, which would pass the higher costs on to consumers. “Why require overpayment and require insurers to increase rates when people are already worried about the affordability of property insurance?” he said.
Insurance premium tax write-offs
Assembly Bill 1354, by Assemblymembers Heath Flora and Greg Wallis, would allow California taxpayers to write off the rising costs of their fire insurance premiums for the next five years. Flora, of Ripon, and Wallis, of Rancho Mirage, are Republicans.
The tax credits would reduce the amount of personal income taxes people would pay to the state. They would be based on the difference between their current premiums and their premiums from 2023, plus any current assessments or charges.If passed, the tax credit would apply to individuals with annual adjusted gross incomes not exceeding $150,000, with the limit being $300,000 for joint taxpayers. Owners of individual homes and properties with four dwelling units or less, and individual condos and mobile homes, would qualify as long as their property values do not exceed $3.3 million.
“Our insurance industry is in shambles right now. For the next few years it’s not going to be great.” — Heath Flora, Republican Assemblymember, Ripon
Flora told CalMatters he expects premiums to rise in the short term as the insurance department’s new regulations are implemented, but that he hopes it all means insurers will start writing policies in the state again.
“Our insurance industry is in shambles right now,” he said. “For the next few years it’s not going to be great. If we can allow our constituents to write off some of that increase, maybe they can get some sort of relief.”
But he doesn’t yet know what it would cost the state — and its taxpayers. Flora said he plans to ask the Legislative Analyst’s Office to look into it.
“There will be a hit to the general fund,” Flora acknowledged, adding that “in California, we spend a lot of money on a lot of different things. But fundamentally, people cannot buy homes without insurance.”
Amy Bach, executive director of the consumer advocacy group United Policyholders, does not support the bill and said “if we’re going to have insurance companies benefit from taxpayer funds paid toward premiums,” the state should extract some concessions from insurance companies, including getting them to write more policies. Bach said what she is in favor of is tax credits for mitigation expenses. For example, one bill would establish state grants for fire-rated roofs and other expenses, while another would allow for tax-free savings accounts for the purposes of mitigation or deductibles in case of a disaster.
Douglas Heller, director of insurance at Consumer Federation of America, agreed, saying taxpayer dollars would be better used preventing catastrophe and loss in the state.
Fossil-fuel company liability
Senate Bill 222, by Sen. Scott Wiener and several co-authors, would allow insurance companies and individuals to sue fossil-fuel companies over damages from climate-related disasters — part of a wave of efforts to hold the industry responsible for climate change. Hawaii is also considering a similar bill.
“Disasters that are so much more frequent and so much bigger in scale than five to 10 years ago (are) not random,” said Wiener, a Democrat from San Francisco, during a press conference. “That’s because of climate change being fueled by companies.”
The idea is that allowing individuals, insurers and the FAIR Plan to try to recoup some costs from disasters would provide an alternative to insurance companies simply raising their rates.
A business group that represents insurance companies warned against the legislation, saying it could lead to increased costs for consumers. Though California Business Roundtable does not publicly disclose all its members, it does include executives from the insurance and fossil-fuel industries, said Brooke Armour, president of the California Center for Jobs & the Economy, the group’s information arm.
Center for Climate Integrity, a co-sponsor of Wiener’s bill, has been trying for almost a decade to hold the fossil fuel industry accountable for climate change. Iyla Shornstein, political director at the group, said if nobody holds the oil industry responsible for disaster costs, insurance rates will only continue to “skyrocket and overburden victims.”
Then-U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, a Democrat from California, addresses the Women’s Caucus at the Democratic Party convention in Sacramento on Nov. 17, 2023. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters
###
This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
###
Katie Porter, the former Democratic congress member from Orange County who became a progressive star with her vigorous interrogations during committee hearings, is running for governor of California.
After months of hinting that she would run, Porter formally launched her 2026 gubernatorial campaign today with a video posted to social media in which she touts her independence from corporate interests and lambastes President Donald Trump.
“I first ran for office to hold Trump accountable. I feel that same call to serve now to stop him from hurting Californians,” Porter said in the video. “As governor, I won’t ever back down when Trump hurts Californians — whether he’s holding up disaster relief, attacking our rights or our communities, or screwing over working families to benefit himself and his cronies.”
Her announcement follows just a year after her unsuccessful bid for U.S. Senate. That race ended acrimoniously when Porter, who finished a distant third in the primary, called the election “rigged by billionaires,” for which she received enormous criticism.
But the national exposure has helped make her an immediate frontrunner to replace the termed-out Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Severalindependentpolls since last fall show Porter with a clear lead over other announced and expected gubernatorial candidates. She also begins with more than $1.4 million left over from her Senate campaign — though the race for governor could ultimately require tens of millions of dollars in fundraising.
Porter, who flipped a Republican seat in 2018, left Congress in January after three terms and returned to teaching at the UC Irvine School of Law.
Porter aims to protect Californians from Trump
Though she’s touting “fresh blood and new ideas,” her platform is so far light on specifics. In her campaign launch video, Porter mentions protecting abortion rights, LGBTQ rights and immigrant communities and never letting “big banks, Big Pharma or Big Oil screw people over.”
“I’ve only ever been motivated by one thing: Making Californians’ lives better,” she said. “And I’ll go toe-to-toe with anyone who tries to hurt Californians. Because that’s what it means to have the courage to solve our toughest problems.”
Her focus on the ongoing ideological and political clashes between California and the federal government could position Porter as the state’s leading anti-Trump voice as Newsom instead tries to curry favor with the president to secure federal disaster aid for the devastating January fires in Los Angeles. Fewer than a third of adults approve of Trump in heavily Democratic California.
That might bolster Porter in a crowded race where the major Democratic candidates — Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, former state Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond and former Controller Betty Yee — have so far mostly leaned into their personal biographies and messaging about affordability.
Attorney General Rob Bonta, who has already sued the new Trump administration more than a half dozen times, recently announced that he would forgo a run for governor and seek re-election.
Candidates wait for Harris decision
But the possibility that former Vice President Kamala Harris, who lost to Trump in November, could still enter the field looms large. Politico reported last week that Harris plans to decide by this summer whether she will run for governor — a decision that would likely force other candidates out of the race because of her advantages in fundraising and name ID.
The June 2026 gubernatorial primary is an open election from which the top two candidates will advance to a runoff, regardless of their party affiliation. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, a Republican, and moderate Democrat Stephen Cloobeck, the founder of a timeshare company, are among the other announced candidates.
En el corazón de Michoacán, México, nació una leyenda el 20 de
abril de 1938, llamada María De Jesús Galván-Vázquez, conocida
después por su nombre de casada, María De Jesús Munguía. Esta
mujer extraordinaria, un faro de resiliencia y amor, vivió una vida
que abarcó casi un siglo. Fue una fuerza de la naturaleza, moldeando
las vidas de quienes la rodeaban con una fuerza y compasión
inquebrantables, junto a sus 12 hermanos.
Su viaje comenzó en los vibrantes paisajes de Michoacán, donde las
montañas y valles acunaron sus sueños de infancia. Con un corazón
lleno de determinación, navegó por los desafíos de la vida,
encontrando eventualmente un compañero en su amado esposo, Dionisio
Munguía Farías. Se casaron el 23 de julio de 1953 y juntos,
construyeron una familia que se convertiría en su mayor legado.
Bendecida con 20 hijos, los crió a cada uno con un amor sin límites.
Su hogar fue un santuario de calidez y risas, donde las lecciones de
bondad y perseverancia se transmitieron a través de las
generaciones. A medida que su familia creció, también lo hizo su
corazón, expandiéndose para abrazar a 112 nietos, 214 bisnietos y
un asombroso número de 37 tataranietos.
Aunque su esposo falleció en Junio 22, 2003, ella llevó su memoria
consigo, un testimonio de su vínculo perdurable. En los años que
siguieron, encontró nuevamente compañía y alegría, compartiendo
su vida con un amoroso novio Thomas Ramos-Vazquez desde 2013 hasta
2024. Juntos, crearon nuevos recuerdos, añadiendo colores vibrantes
al tapiz de su vida.
Sus mayores alegrías en la vida eran sus hijos, la alegre música de
los Chirrines, contar chistes y celebrar en fiestas. En el año 2000,
se trasladó a los Estados Unidos para estar con su esposo e hijos
que se habían mudado allí. En su nuevo hogar, no solo tuvo amigos y
familia, sino una comunidad que la amó y apreció. Siempre fue
celebrada y mimada por su familia y seres queridos.
María fue una mujer católica dedicada que conocía el rosario de
memoria. Su fe fue un pilar en su vida, guiándola con devoción
inquebrantable a través de los altos y bajos.
Sus últimos días los pasó rodeada por el amor de su extensa
familia, un testimonio vivo del profundo impacto que tuvo en el
mundo. El 27 de noviembre de 2024, falleció en paz, dejando atrás
un legado que será atesorado por generaciones.
Su historia es una de amor, resiliencia y el extraordinario poder de
la familia. Durante su vida, ella era hija, hermana, tía, esposa,
madre, abuela, bisabuela y tatarabuela, pero también era el corazón
y el alma de un linaje que siempre llevará su espíritu. A través
de las vidas que tocó y el amor que compartió, su memoria
continuará brillando intensamente, una luz guía para todos los que
siguen sus pasos. Que ella descanse en paz.
###
Her journey began in the vibrant landscapes of Michoacán, where the
mountains and valleys cradled her childhood dreams. With a heart full
of determination, she navigated the challenges of life, eventually
finding a partner in her beloved husband, Dionicio Munguía Farías.
They married on July 23, 1953, and together they built a family that
would become her greatest legacy.
Blessed with 20 children, she nurtured each one with a love that knew
no bounds. Her home was a sanctuary of warmth and laughter, where
lessons of kindness and perseverance were passed down through the
generations. As her family grew, so did her heart, expanding to
embrace 112 grandchildren, 214 great-grandchildren, and an astounding
37 great-great-grandchildren.
Though her husband passed away in June 22, 2003, she carried his
memory with her, a testament to their enduring bond. In the years
that followed, she found companionship and joy once more, sharing her
life with a loving, Thomas Ramos-Vazquez from 2013 to 2024. Together,
they created new memories, adding vibrant colors to her life.
Her greatest joys in life were her children, the lively Chirrines of
Mexican farm music, sharing jokes, and always celebrating at parties.
In 2000, she moved to the United States to be with her husband and
children, who had relocated to Eureka. In her new home, she grew to
have not just friends and family but a community that loved and
cherished her. She was always celebrated and spoiled by her family
and loved ones.
María was a dedicated Catholic woman who knew her rosary by heart.
Her faith was a cornerstone of her life, guiding her through the
highs and lows with unwavering devotion.
Her final days were spent surrounded by the love of her expansive
family, a living testament to the profound impact she had on the
world. On November 27, 2024, she passed peacefully, leaving behind a
legacy that will be cherished for generations to come.
Her story is one of love, resilience, and the extraordinary power of
family. During her life, she was a daughter, sister, aunt, wife,
mother, grandmother, great-grandmother, and great-great-grandmother,
but she was also the heart and soul of a lineage that will forever
carry her spirit. Through the lives she touched and the love she
shared, her memory will continue to shine brightly, a guiding light
for all who follow in her footsteps. May she rest in peace.
Árbol Familiar/Family Tree:
Padres/Parents:
Santiago Galvan (Fallecido/Deceased) Y Rebecca Vazquez
(Fallecida/Deceased)
Esposo:
Dionisio Munguia Farias (Fallecido/Deceased)
Suegros/In Laws:
Maximiliano Munguia Mendoza (Fallecido/Deceased) y Altagarcia Farias
Bueno (Fallecida/Deceased)
Hermanos/Siblings
Tonya
María
(Fallecido/Deceased)
María
(Fallecida/Deceased)
María
De Jesús Galván-Vázquez (Fallecida/Deceased)
The obituary above was submitted on behalf of María De Jesús Munguía’s loved ones. The Lost Coast Outpost runs obituaries of Humboldt County residents at no charge. See guidelines here. Email news@lostcoastoutpost.com.
