Mark Harris, attorney, initially my feeling is none.  I have a followup it is a civil case not a criminal.  It was published at the behest of LE agencies.  The thing I found disturbing about the case… it was a lot of weed.  What I find in that case, The decison   LE loose standard  Littlefields held to high standard of proof.  Doctors experts.  Jason Brown expert for Littlefield.  Can’t give a medical opinion because he isn’t a dorctor but a police officer could make a loose assessment of the  For patients when you are attempting to prove up it is avery high standard yet po doesn’t in my o suggested that these law enforcem of had a right to question the doctor.  It would be the provence of another doc or a medical prof.  It has been a big bone of c cause there is very little medical mj 

This isn’t processed weed it is on the hoof iti isn’t processed everyone knows that you don’t know what you’ve got until it is processed.  Whther or not no medical training.  When something is growing  it is not yet medicine it is in the process of becoming medicine

Double or triple what they expected what am I supposed to do cut this down daily.  

If you are g  It puts patients in a complete quandry thta tipe of testimony is not available.  Where are all the gp  

Law enfocement will use it to make an es in the field something is of suffiencet quantity.  relative medical condition of a human.  The Mauer standard.  for le to make this kind of a call they would have to make that kind of a call. Outrageous.  Court appeared to encourage skeptiscm of the medical conditions of the family they all had the same thing in the same family.

I really divorcing this from the actual facts of the case. Everything is a varation. …There was so much mj  Maybe not in terms of numbers (0) I would have been much more interested in a case that there was more of a struggle.  Untrained lae could make a call about a patient I think it is a very cynical way of responding to the situation.

These guys in the field  this is not an easy call it is putting them in a hard place. When faced with a garden they only have so many options.  What I’ve encouraged that they not destroy a crop that has indications of medical.  Stand by investigate further before destryoing it.  It is very difficult for peopople in a collective to see why they should come forward.  I see many cases where memebers of the collective who are on the ground are left on the hook while the other persons scatter.  but if the mj left.

I recommend that people post collective current recommendations  post a number that le can call.  Ultimately when you talk to LE that the lack of medicianl courses. 

Excluding doctors to come to court because they are afraid for their licenses.  Requireing a high level of proof then you are allowing an officer who has a year  Need an expert in cannabis.

I don’t think it really have a bearing.  LE in the office in the field will largely be destroyed by a long history of expert case law that says that experts  Largely irrelevant to their ability to make a determination about medical marijuana.

mharris@humboldt1.com 

—————————

Kristin Nevedahl 

Moving the ball forward towards the end of Prohibition Puts the doctors in more of a postion of having to defend you.

LE says you can’t have this 

ASK A DR>