###

A bill currently working its way through the state legislature aims to provide a bit of tax relief for California’s legal cannabis industry, which has seen nearly four straight years of declining revenues in both wholesale and retail sales. Industry professionals and their advocates in Sacramento say this tax break is necessary to salvage the state’s regulated marketplace at a time when the black market still accounts for roughly 60 percent of the weed consumed in California.

Here in the Emerald Triangle, where the post-legalization “green rush” sent property values and grow shop receipts through the roof, the legal weed industry has crumbled. Those who remain in business say a higher tax bill will only send consumers to the black market, prompting more bankruptcies and thus fewer taxable sales.

“I don’t think it’s a secret that the legal market is not doing well,” said Ross Gordon, a policy analyst with the industry nonprofit Origins Council. “For most businesses, I think they’d characterize it as a state of collapse.”

On July 1, the state’s excise tax jumped from 15 percent to 19 percent as part of a political bargain struck in 2022 to help stabilize the fledgling marketplace. The deal, passed via a budget trailer bill, AB 195, eliminated the state’s $161-per-pound cultivation tax, which had generated ​​$166 million in state revenue the previous year. 

In order to make up for that lost revenue — which financed childcare programs and youth groups; environmental, wildlife and conservation programs; law enforcement and justice organizations; drug treatment prevention centers and other Tier 3 programs — AB 195 allowed state regulators to increase the excise tax after three years. That’s what happened on July 1.

A new industry-sponsored bill, AB 564, would suspend this tax increase for the next six years at least, and while industry professionals say this lifeline is necessary, critics argue that it would come at the expense of children and the environment. 

Jim Keddy, executive director of the Sacramento nonprofit Youth Forward, is among the people working to keep the bill from passing.

“What we’re trying to do is protect these funding streams that are crucial to child care, to youth services and to the environment,” he recently told the Outpost. As a member of the state’s Prop 64 Advisory Group, Keddy helps determine which programs receive cannabis tax revenues, and he argued that this tradeoff — taxing a vice to finance a public good — is exactly what California voters approved when they passed Prop 64 in 2016. 

“Voters supported an initiative they believed would provide funding for kids and for the environment,” he said. “That’s what the legislature and the governor need to respect. And if the cannabis industry wants to get out from under paying taxes, they should put a statewide ballot measure together and ask voters to approve it.”

Tax benefits

The North Coast has benefited disproportionately from Prop 64 tax revenues. In the 2024-25 fiscal year alone, Senator Mike McGuire’s district received more than $38 million in state Fish and Wildlife grants for a long list of environmental projects including watershed enhancement, cleanup remediation, research and more.

Meanwhile, the district has received almost $29 million in youth and child care grants since 2022, providing financing for programs from Humboldt County’s Department of Health and Human Services, the Yurok Tribe, Cal Poly Humboldt, McKinleyville Family Resource Center, Two Feathers Native American Family Services, Centro del Pueblo and other local organizations. 

These tax revenues are the state’s only just one funding stream for Alternative Payment Programs, which provide vouchers or subsidies to help eligible low-income families pay for child care. [CORRECTION: While these cannabis tax monies do go toward the state’s AP programs, they represent just a fraction of the state’s $7 billion annual child care budget.]

Terry Supahan is the executive director of True North Organizing Network, which was the recipient of a $600,000 Prop 64 grant to provide wraparound support services for Tribal and Latinx youth while addressing adolescent risk factors for substance use, misuse and disorder. He’s incensed by the prospect of reductions to such funding for the sake of propping up the state’s weed marketplace.

“The cannabis industry is trying to get some tax rebate at the expense of our kids and our futures,” Supahan said. “It makes me insane to a degree.”

He has found his work with Tribal youth immensely rewarding. He said it provides kids with a kind of spiritual, moral and disciplinary shield that he didn’t have growing up.

“The best thing I’ve ever done is be part of expanding and strengthening tribal ceremony and language and culture upriver,” he said.

Supahan doesn’t think much of the cannabis industry. Its embrace of the term “green rush” offends him, given the cultural upheaval and violence that accompanied the gold rush. He recently confronted one of his own adolescent grandchildren who’d been smoking cannabis, telling them that they’re too young; their brain is still developing. And he views legalization as a Faustian bargain.

“If we’re going to make this pact with the devil, then the devil should adhere to what they said they were going to do when it was legalized,” he said. “If we’re gonna trade legalization for taxes then by God they should honor what they set out to do.”

The legislature’s elimination of the cultivation tax in 2022 has resulted in more than $600 million in lost revenues for environmental and child care programs. Keddy said the only reason youth and environmental groups didn’t oppose AB 195 was because both the legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom pledged to replace that lost revenue through the excise tax adjustment that took effect July 1.

‘Just a PR campaign’

Many others agree. In an April letter to San Francisco Assemblymember Mark Berman, a coalition of 98 organizations, including True North, Friends of the Eel River and the Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC), wrote, “If the promise made in AB 195 is not kept, we risk losing at least $150 million per year for childcare, youth, and environmental programs.”

Keddy said that by pursuing AB 564, the state is going back on its word. A spokesperson for Newsom recently told the L.A. Times that if the bill passes, as seems likely, the governor’s office will work with the legislature to ensure there are no cuts to child care. Keddy’s not sure how the state will manage that in the midst of a $20 billion budget deficit. And he’s not convinced by the industry’s pleas this time around.

He pointed to a recent report from the Department of Cannabis Control indicating that legal cannabis production has increased by 70 percent since 2020 and the number of units of cannabis products sold increased by more than 5 percent last year.

“There’s a lot of wishful thinking that goes on where the cannabis industry tells everybody that, you know, if you give them a tax cut they’ll be more profitable and there will be more revenue,” he said. “That’s what they said in 2022, and it’s just a PR campaign, in my opinion.” 

Far from it, according to Chrystal Ortiz, owner of Arcata dispensary Herb & Market. She noted that the recent state tax hike came on the heels of Arcata’s recent sales tax increase from 8.5 percent to 10.25 percent, which took effect on April 1. This double whammy, in conjunction with our region’s anemic economy and the rising costs of everything from groceries to PG&E bills, is having “a huge, huge impact on our customers,” she said.

###

While the legal market may be selling more flower and derivative products than ever before, as Keddy points out, Ortiz said the market is being saturated with sub-par weed produced by deep-pocketed interests that can tolerate tiny profit margins, or even losing money.

Given the increased tax burden and declining demand, “Really the only place you can budge is on the purchase price, which encourages [dispensary owners] to support these kind of corporate entities that are financially backed [and] that are intentionally operating at a loss because they’re the only ones who can afford to shoulder some of that [burden],” she said.

When July 1 rolled around, some companies took advantage. “Big corporations started immediately offering tax incentive deals, like, ‘Oh, we know you’re struggling with this huge tax increase. We’re going to give you X, Y and Z of a discount,’ Ortiz said. “Whereas, for the average small farmer or small product maker, there already isn’t the margins [for such incentives].”

Gordon, the policy analyst, agreed.

“More and more of the legal market is composed of commodity products produced by large companies at a low cost, and small farmers and craft products are being edged out of the market,” he said.

Pointing to that same DCC report that Keddy cited, Gordon noted that while legal production continues to increase (licensed cannabis production grew 11.8 percent to 1.4 million pounds in 2024), lower retail and wholesale prices are driving many licensees out business while the black market thrives. (An estimated 11.4 million pounds of illicit cannabis is produced in California each year, according to the DCC report, though much of that gets exported to other states.)

###

Gordon said small-scale operators were betrayed from the outset of the legal market by the elimination of an agreed-upon one-acre cultivation cap for the first five years of sales, and they continue to be disadvantaged by a lack of legal access to tools that support small craft businesses in any other sector, such as direct-to-consumer sales.

“So I don’t think it’s surprising that if you build a market that doesn’t include those pathways that are appropriate for small producers [then] the market becomes very challenging for small producers,” Gordon said.

He acknowledged that returning the state tax rate to 15 percent won’t solve all of these problems but said he thinks it’s “one necessary piece of having what I think most people want, which is a sustainable and viable legal market.”

Keddy agreed that the game is rigged, to some extent. 

“The legislature has been terrible to your part of the state, in my opinion,” he said. And he granted that corporate growers with massive Central Valley greenhouses are undercutting traditional growers in the Emerald Triangle, as is the emergency of THC-boosted hemp as a competitive product. But he also noted that it’s impossible to save every operator.

“You see it with restaurants and all kinds of retail — things open, things close,” he said.

And Keddy sees it as a bit hypocritical of the industry to call for a reduction in taxes when some of those that money goes toward law enforcement efforts to eradicate black market operators, though he also sees such operators as a fact of life.

“Frankly, I don’t see the illegal market going away anytime soon,” he said. “It’s been part of California for decades, and you know, there are all these other factors at play here.”

Ultimately, Keddy returned to the concept of public relations.

“I think the industry has had the advantage that they can point to taxes, and nobody likes taxes,” he said.

A viable market

But Gordon argued that there are plenty of indicators that California’s legal weed marketplace could be operated more effectively and more profitably, which would benefit everyone.

“I don’t agree with the framing of this conversation as zero-sum,” he said. “Look at states like Oregon and Michigan and see that they’re getting dramatically higher tax revenue per capita because they have legal regulatory structures that support that. It’s not because they’re putting a bunch more money into law enforcement. It’s because they are trying to create a viable market.”

Humboldt County is officially in support of AB 564. In February, County Administrative Officer Elishia Hayes sent a letter to the bill’s author, San Francisco Assemblymember Matt Haney, expressing “strong support” for the bill and describing it as “a critical piece of legislation that supports the sustainability and growth of the cannabis industry in California.”

The Board of Supervisors approved this stance in January as part of its annual legislative platform adoption.

AB 564 has already been approved by the Assembly, and last week made it out of the Senate Appropriations Committee. As with all bills in the Legislature, this one has until Sept. 12 to be passed. Newsom would then have until Oct. 12 to sign the bill into law, which he has vowed to do.

###

Press release from Six Rivers National Forest:

Dillon Fire: 9,375 acres; 21% containment

Email: 2025.Dillon@firenet.gov

Personnel: 1,558

Online Fire Information: www.linktr.ee/srffirepio

The Dillon Fire grew moderately to the west Wednesday, while firefighters held the eastern line, keeping fire from advancing into residences and structures along the Highway 96 corridor.

The Dillon Fire grew to 9,100 acres, but containment also climbed to 21 percent containment. The fire continued its methodical downslope progression into the drainages around Dillon Mountain. Firefighters are assembling a network of forest roads and previous fire lines to halt the fire’s advance toward the Siskiyou Wilderness.

The spot fires north of Dillon Creek put up some smoke, but had limited vegetation to feed and grow off of inside the footprint of the 2023 Elliot Fire. Across the Klamath River, firefighters conducted a small burnout operation to remove vegetation and halt the spread of the spot fire east of Dillon Creek Campground. Handline and hose lays reinforced containment efforts along the spot fire’s eastern flank.

Firefighters installed pumps, hoses and sprinkler kits around homes along the Highway 96 corridor, as well as added depth to firelines up to 250 feet.

Crews continued to go direct where possible along the fire’s southern perimeter, which reached the bottom of the Rock Creek drainage. Contingency lines along Beans Ridge down to the Klamath River were widened and reinforced with hose lays in the event the fire makes an upslope run over Rock Creek.

Clearer skies and temperatures near 100 could produce smoke columns and wind gusts, which could fuel active fire behavior throughout today. Air quality can change quickly during a wildfire. Health and safety information from wildfire smoke can be found at www.airnow.gov/wildfires.

Evacuations and Closures:

Intermittent closures of Highway 96 are possible, particularly near Seiad Valley. Road updates can be found on the Caltrans’ website at https://dot.ca.gov/travel.

The Six Rivers National Forest has issued a forest closure order in the vicinity of the Dillon Fire. More information can be found at www.linktr.ee/srffirepio.

The Ti Bar area have been placed in a level 3-GO status. Dillon Fire evacuations and warnings can be found at https://protect.genasys.com:

• Evacuation Orders: SIS-1402-A, SIS-1405, SIS-1503-A, SIS-1506, SIS-1509-A and SIS-1509-B.
• Evacuation Warnings: SIS-1300, SIS-1301, SIS-1402-B, SIS-1408, SIS-1503-B, 1509-C and SIS- 1509-D.

Shelter information and evacuation resources are available through the Siskiyou County Office of Emergency Services at (530) 340–3539.

###

###

Press release from the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office:

On Sept. 3, 2025, at about 7:30 a.m. Humboldt County Sheriff’s deputies conducted a probation search at a residence located in the 1600 block of Hyland St., in Arcata and arrested the resident 71-year-old, David Eugene Flocchini.  Flocchini is currently on formal felony probation in Humboldt County for operating or maintaining a drug house. 

During the search of the residence deputies seized approximately 238 grams of Methamphetamine, a digital scale, and packaging material.  Flocchini was arrested and booked into the Humboldt County Correctional Facility on the following charges:

• H.S. 11378(a) Possession of a Controlled Substance for Sale
• P.C.  1203.2(a) Violation of Probation

This case is still under investigation.

Anyone with information about this case or related criminal activity is encouraged to call the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office at (707) 445-7251 or the Sheriff’s Office Crime Tip line at (707) 268-2539.

###

###

Humboldt County must plan for 5,962 new homes over the next decade to meet state housing mandates. About a third of those — up to 1,855 dwelling units — must be located in Eureka.

At Tuesday’s meeting, the Eureka City Council got its first look at the state-issued Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2027-2035, which would nearly double the housing targets set in the city’s current planning cycle, which began in 2019.

Every eight years, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) calculates how many new homes cities and counties must plan for to accommodate population growth and meet housing needs across all income levels. The HCD looks at the current number of units in a given jurisdiction and compares it to population estimates and various other factors to determine the total RHNA, as shown in the table below.

Eureka’s RHNA could be anywhere between 1,530 and 1,855 new units, depending on the allocation methodology selected by the Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG), said Development Services Director Cristin Kenyon.

“If Eureka receives the RHNA of 1,740 units, that’s an assignment of 218 net new units per year, which is almost double what we had last time,” Kenyon said, noting that the 2019-2027 cycle required the city to plan for 952 new units. “For the past six years, we’ve been averaging 44 dwelling units per year. … We still have sites that are vacant that we’ve outlined in [the current housing element], but if those haven’t been built on, we can’t carry them over. You can, but there’s a limit on it, and [the state] asks for more evidence if it’s a site that’s been used in a previous cycle.”

Before taking questions from the council, Kenyon emphasized that the RHNA doesn’t require the city to build a specific number of units. Rather, it requires the city to plan for new housing.

“[The state’s] focus is on whether we have an adequate plan — an adopted and certified housing element — and whether we are completing our plan’s implementation measures,” she continued. “In enforcing housing element law, the state’s focus really isn’t on the number of units that actually get built, since that’s out of our control. …  We are really relying on others to finance and construct the housing.”

If the city fails to comply, it could lose its pro-housing designation and grant funding opportunities, Kenyon said. Persistent noncompliance could result in fines of up to $100,000 per month.

“Holy cow,” said Councilmember Kati Moulton. “Thank you for that informative and terrifying report. Terrifying is not the right word, but boy howdy.”

Councilmembers Scott Bauer and G. Mario Fernandez agreed, each noting that Kenyon’s presentation was “overwhelming” and “intimidating.” Councilmember Bauer asked if the city even has the physical space to build 1,740 new housing units. 

“We don’t have very many vacant, unconstrained parcels … so we need to rely on non-vacant sites, and there’s a higher bar for those,” Kenyon said. “You have to prove there’s a realistic and demonstrated capacity for redevelopment, and we don’t have the type of market demand that other built-out cities like Berkeley might have to really demonstrate that acceptable evidence.”

Kenyon added that Eureka’s downtown is zoned to accommodate 10-story buildings, but said no one has ever sought to construct a building that tall. Still, it’s an option. 

“We do what we can to control what happens, but the market dictates what happens, especially when it comes to median income property,” City Manager Miles Slattery added.

The council agreed to accept the report but did not take any formal action on the item. 

Once the HCAOG selects a methodology for local jurisdictions’ housing allocations, the HCD will review the proposal and approve it early next year. The City of Eureka will have until July 2027 to approve a new housing element for the 2027-2035 cycle.

###

A little earlier in Tuesday’s meeting, the city council approved a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Blue Lake Rancheria to assess the feasibility of revamping Dock B as a “regional economic and community asset” for the Port of Humboldt Bay. 

While it might not look like much, Dock B — a 7.1-acre site behind Englund Marine & Industrial Supply, near the Wharfinger Building on Marina Way — is the only Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) in Eureka. That zoning allows corporations to import and export goods at a reduced tax or tariff rate when they enter U.S. markets. There are three other FTZs in Humboldt County, including sites on the Samoa Peninsula, Fields Landing and the Humboldt County Airport.

Eureka Economic Development Manager Swan Asbury noted that there’s been an uptick in interest over FTZs in recent months in response to the Trump administration’s sweeping tariff policies, which renewed interest in Dock B.

“[Dock B] is in pretty bad shape,” Asbury said at Tuesday’s meeting. “It’s been condemned, it’s been through a fire, it’s been through an earthquake, but there’s a couple hundred pilings below it that are still there.”

Speaking on behalf of the Blue Lake Rancheria, Director of Strategic Initiatives Ciara Emery said the Tribe has been interested in “maritime commerce opportunities” for some time now, and is looking to apply for a U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) grant to do something with the site. [DISCLOSURE: The Blue Laker Rancheria is a partial owner of the Outpost’s parent company, Lost Coast Communications, Inc.]

“The tribe is viewing these DOT funds as a potential opportunity, in collaboration with [the city], for getting some feasibility study money to determine what a project might look like, what kind of activities might be fruitful and appropriate [at that location], and working together to find ways to advance tribal sovereignty,” Emery said.

Councilmember Fernandez asked what a “success” would look like and if the Rancheria had any specific plans for the site. Emery said, in the short-term,  the MOU would help the Rancheria’s grant application look more viable and demonstrate that the city is willing to collaborate in the future.

“In the longer term, there’s a lot of interesting things that we all might think about in terms of how is the city supporting tribal commerce, tribe-to-tribe trade, revitalization of the port, especially in light of recent developments,” she said, likely referring to the Trump administration’s recent decision to pull more than $426 million in grant funding from the Humboldt Bay Harbor District for offshore wind port developments. “I think the MOU is as much as both parties can make of it.”

After a bit of additional discussion, the council approved the MOU — linked here — in a unanimous 4-0 vote, with Councilmember Renee Contreras-DeLoach absent.

###

After 14 months of construction, Eureka’s Da’ Ya Park is just about ready for playtime! The city’s planning staff gave an update on the park’s construction at Tuesday’s meeting and shared some progress shots.

The city will host a grand opening for the park on Saturday, Sept. 13. More information can be found below.

###

[NOTE: This post has been updated from its original version to correct a minor grammatical error.]

###

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

###

It’s a common refrain for critics of Gov. Gavin Newsom: Focus on your job.

The jabs have grown louder this year as Newsom launched a new weekly political podcast and traveled to other states that could be pivotal in a potential presidential campaign. A poll in May found that twice as many California voters believe the governor is devoting more attention to boosting his national profile than fixing the problems of the state.

“If he wants to prove to the United States that he would be a good president, why doesn’t he start by leading and actually running the state of California?” then-Republican Assemblymember Bill Essayli, who has since been appointed a U.S. attorney, said in a March appearance on Fox News.

But it’s difficult to evaluate what effect Newsom’s extracurricular activities have had on his work, because the governor’s office has not made his full schedule available all year.

Each month, CalMatters requests Newsom’s calendar under the California Public Records Act. While the governor’s office routinely released those documents in the past, it has not provided anything new in five months and has yet to hand over any of his 2025 calendars.

Multiple inquiries about a timeline for releasing the records, a requirement under the law, have been ignored during that period. Representatives for the governor’s legal affairs unit, which handles records requests, wrote that the calendars “will be provided as soon as they are ready for release.”

Newsom’s spokesperson did not respond to questions about what is causing the delay, but said in an email Wednesday that the calendars would be provided when they are “finalized and ready for public disclosure.”

“Governor Newsom has been among the most transparent governors in California’s history and we’ll continue to share his calendar, as always, with the transparency, diligence, and accuracy it deserves,” spokesperson Izzy Gardon wrote. He added, “I look forward to reading your webpost about the hardships you’ve encountered while waiting.”

“This is not difficult — or should not be difficult.”
— David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition

David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, which advocates for government transparency, said it’s “deeply problematic” that the governor’s office has not quickly fulfilled what amounts to a simple clerical task.

“We’re not talking hundreds and hundreds of records that need to be rounded up and redacted. It’s a pretty straightforward request,” Loy said. “This is not difficult — or should not be difficult.”

A fight for public access

California governors have shared their calendars for about two decades.

Previously, Gov. George Deukmejian went to court to protect those records from disclosure, arguing that making his appointments public would discourage people from meeting with him and hinder his decision-making process. The California Supreme Court ruled in his favor in 1991.

Then California voters expanded the Public Records Act in 2004, ultimately compelling then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to begin releasing his calendar. During Gov. Jerry Brown’s subsequent tenure, his office proactively provided his appointments log monthly to reporters who made standing public records requests.

The schedules are of limited utility, because they include only official events, not personal or political activities, and even those are sometimes redacted to protect attorney-client privilege or the governor’s security. Newsom’s calendars from previous years include many days with just a few meetings or no official events listed at all, and the hours are often filled with “work time,” providing no further details.

But because most of the governor’s other records, including emails, remain legally protected from disclosure, calendars offer the public the most comprehensive picture available of who Newsom is speaking to and how he is prioritizing his time. That means their release can still be politically fraught, and numerous administrations have resisted going beyond the minimum requirements.

“It would be so much better for transparency if they just posted his calendar online,” Loy said.

Calendars not produced ‘promptly’

The governor’s office last provided Newsom’s calendars to CalMatters on April 1, for the months of September through December 2024.

When a request is made under the California Public Records Act, government agencies are required to determine within 10 business days whether they have any disclosable documents and, if so, provide an estimated delivery date. The agencies are then supposed to produce the records “promptly,” which is not a defined time frame.

The law also obligates that records be produced as they existed at the time of the request.

The calendars that Newsom’s office has released in the past are PDF files that simply list his schedule in chronological order: date, time, a brief description of the appointment, location and staff lead.

The entries appear to be copied over from a calendar program into a text file, which Loy said is concerning, because the law requires that electronic records are provided in their native format, for proper accountability.

“The whole point of transparency law is ‘trust but verify,’” he said. “We don’t have to take their word that they’re doing it right. We can see it for ourselves.”

Newsom’s spokespeople did not respond to questions about how the governor’s calendar is maintained and in what format.

The delay echoes a similar issue involving Newsom’s tax returns. While they are not a public record, Newsom pledged to be the first California governor to release his filings every year while in office. But he has not done so in more than three years, last sharing a tax return in March 2022, as he was running for re-election.

John Charles Ryder was born on May 27, 1970, in St. Clair Shores, Michigan, to June Jacqueline Pheeney and William Vernon Ryder II. He had two siblings: an older brother, William Vernon (Will/Bill), and an older sister, Katherine Elizabeth (Kate).

John spent his childhood in New England. He lived with his mother and went to school in Portland, Maine, and lived with his father in Newburyport, Massachusetts, just north of Boston. Growing up he was a devoted Dungeons & Dragons player, dirt-bike rider, and then skateboard stuntman. His mother came home from work one afternoon to find a quarter-pipe in her suburban driveway, with John airborne. The pipe blocked her garage for many months despite John’s promises otherwise. He made many life-long friendships during his years in Maine, most who have come here to Humboldt to visit or work with him.

John’s early life was deeply shaped by the passing of his father who died of cancer when John was a young teen. He was with his father in his final moments, an experience that left a lasting impact. These were difficult years and John was a challenge to his teachers, needing them to understand his situation, and to grow his mind - not only grade his tests. His mother enrolled him at North Yarmouth Academy in Maine, a private school where she hoped he would be better guided than in the public school system. He met some of his closest friends there.

In 1989, John graduated high school and moved to California to be closer to his brother, who was in Los Angeles. In the early 1990s he enrolled at Humboldt State University, where he earned straight A’s in his first year while supporting himself as a carpenter. In 1994, his daughter, Emily Eyer-Ryder, was born to Catie Eyer. Emily was raised in Arcata and was, from the day she was born, the love of John’s life. He embedded in her his strong sense of social justice and empathy, and his wicked sense of humor.

John traveled the world widely, always in pursuit of new experiences and good music, to which he was devoted, but he remained deeply connected to the people and land of his adopted home. He was constantly exploring the Redwoods, the rivers, creeks and coast – mapping the land and its history. He farmed in Humboldt and built a beautiful home deep on Fickle Hill, where he was surrounded by trees and birdsong. He never stopped appreciating the beauty and peace of mind that it offered.

John lived fully and with force, touching all in his orbit. He passed on August 28, in a place he loved, surrounded by friends.

John is survived by his daughter, Emily Eyer-Ryder; his brother and sister-in-law, William and Betty Ryder; his sister and brother-in-law, Kate and Per Landemoen; as well as our next wonderful generation - Louise, William, Emma, Ella and little John Ryder.

We are gathering his family and many friends together for a send-off and memorial at:

Bayside Grange on Sunday, September 7, at 2 p.m.

Please join us – All are welcome.

Henry Clifton Clark Jr., 87, of Fortuna, passed away peacefully on August 15, 2025, at his home surrounded by family. Henry was born January 14, 1938, in Idabel, Oklahoma to Henry and Mildred Clark. Henry was the middle child of three children. The family moved a few places before settling down in Pepperwood. He graduated high school in 1958 from Fortuna Union High School. Henry met his first wife, Marilyn, at one of the local barn dances. They instantly fell in love and knew they both shared a love for family and decided to start their own. Henry worked at Pacific Lumber for a short time before moving on to be a diesel mechanic for Peterson CAT. He worked there for over 25 years before retiring.

Henry and Marilyn were married November 21, 1959. They had four children, Joyce, Doris, Bonnie and Marie. Henry was a loving husband and father. Attending his children’s many band concerts and track meets. Henry loved pitching horseshoes, he was the president of the Fortuna Horseshoe club for many years. Henry and Marilyn also loved to square dance as often as they could together. They took their children to the dances to teach them along with other family and friends. Henry and Marilyn could often be found playing Bingo and singing karaoke with their friends. Henry was an avid hunter and fisherman along with a huge 49ers fan. His favorite was hunting deer and pheasants. He would fish for salmon to bring home to smoke.

Though he loved pitching horseshoes and dancing, Henry’s favorite role was being a grandpa and great grandpa. He treasured his time with his grandkids often traveling to visit them. When one of his grandchildren was in need of extra help, he traveled to be with him to help out.

Sadly Marilyn passed away in 2003. After 10 years Henry found love again with Alwilda Stokesberry. They were married December 27, 2014 in Rio Dell. Henry and Alwilda enjoyed singing karaoke together. Henry also enjoyed spending time with Alwilda’s kids and grandkids. He could be found watching and traveling to watch them play baseball and other sports. Alwilda was with Henry until the very end.

Henry is survived by his wife Alwilda Stokesberry; children Joyce McNeese of Eureka, Doris (Cris) Rocha of Tillamook, Oregon, Bonnie (Carl) Miesbauer, of Grass Valley, and Marie (Dan, Kurt, Tim) Debuck of Milton, Washington; 10 grandchildren, 16 great-grandchildren; his sisters Juanita Raugh and Romona Bender; many nieces and nephews; by marriage three children, seven grandchildren and three great-grandchildren.

Henry is preceded in death by his wife Marilyn (Currier) Clark; his grandson Kj DeBuck; his parents Henry and Mildred Clark.

The family would like to thank Hospice of Humboldt for the wonderful, compassionate care and support during his final days. In lieu of flowers please donate to Hospice of Humboldt at www.hospiceofhumbolt.org 707-445-7397

A celebration of life will be planned at a later time.