Ryan Burns / Monday, Oct. 16, 2023 @ 3:43 p.m. / Agendizer
Arcata Staff Urges City Council to Formally Oppose the ‘Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative’
###
At its regular meeting Wednesday evening, the Arcata City Council will consider formally opposing the controversial “Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative,” a resident-initiated ballot measure that aims to dramatically reshape the county’s weed regulations.
While the initiative would not directly impact cannabis businesses within Arcata city limits, the measure threatens to kneecap the already-struggling industry countywide, thereby negatively impacting Arcata’s manufacturing sector, according to a staff report prepared by Community Development Director David Loya.
The staff report recommends that the city council take a stand against the measure, which will appear on March 2024 ballots unless a legal challenge filed last week succeeds in getting it removed for being “misleading.”
Loya’s staff report runs through a number of criticisms that have repeatedly been levied against the initiative by the Humboldt County Growers Alliance, an industry group that’s among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed last week. In fact, the report notes that HCGA “provided input on the Initiative prior to the writing of this staff report.”
The group’s comments are included as an attachment to the staff report, linked below.
What are the criticisms? Well, Loya’s report notes that while the initiative includes several positive aspects — e.g., expanding public notice, ensuring appropriate use of generators and limiting noise — it would do nothing to improve regulatory oversight, and its 10,000-square-foot size limit on gardens “is much too low to support a viable farm.”
The report argues that the initiative would further interfere with the viability of the industry by preventing cultivators from diversifying in their attempts to stay afloat.
“Each sector in the industry has had to pivot multiple times in response to the changing market,” the report says. “Many cultivators have had to assume some processing role to remain viable. Several have had to take over some distribution to ensure their product was marketed appropriately to bring the best value to market. These additional activities would be prohibited under the Initiative.”
And that inflexibility, in turn, would negatively impact Arcata’s manufacturing sector, the report says.
And since voter initiatives can only be amended through more voter initiatives, the regulations enshrined by the Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative would be incredibly difficult to to tinker with. Better to consider amendments to the county’s existing regulations through the Board of Supervisors, the staff report says.
###
What else is on Wednesday’s agenda? The council will take its latest annual look at Arcata’s unmet transit needs, and it will look at updating an existing regulation to lower the speed limit in some newly created school zones. See below for synopses, both straight-laced and creative, from Genie, the Outpost’s AI agenda bot.
###
PREVIOUSLY:
- An Initiative to Reshape Humboldt’s Cannabis Industry Qualified for the Ballot, and It Has Growers Worried
- Supes Agree to Put Controversial Weed Initiative on 2024 Ballot, Though They Hope to Work With Organizers on Alternatives
- Humboldt County Cannabis Farmers Blast ‘Misleading’ Ballot Initiative That Would Impose New Restrictions on Cultivators; Supervisors Form an Ad Hoc Committee to Work on Alternatives
- Proponents of the Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative Are Calling Out the Board of Supervisors, County Staff for Allegedly Distorting the Intent of the 2024 Ballot Measure
- Another Day of Cannabis Reform Initiative Panic at the Board of Supes; It’s Now All But Certain That Voters Will Decide on the Controversial Measure on the March 2024 Ballot
- Humboldt Supervisors Partially Reinstate Measure S Cannabis Cultivation Tax at 10 Percent as Market Shows Signs of Stabilization
- ‘Cannabis Reform Initiative’ Legal Challenge Filed: Small Farmers, Industry Reps Ask the Court to Kick Next Year’s ‘Measure A’ Off the Ballot
Arcata City Council
Oct. 18, 2023, 6 p.m.
1. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
2. FLAG SALUTE
3. ROLL CALL
A. Roll Call
4. CEREMONIAL MATTERS
5. REPORT BY COMMISSION/COMMITTEE
6. EARLY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
7. N/A
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes of Oct 4, 2023 6:00 PM
B. 4284 : Bi-Weekly Report on Disbursements.
Finance Director Tabatha Miller is recommending that City Council approve the disbursements listing for the period of September 23 to October 6, 2023. This means they want the Council to agree to the payments that have been made during this time.
According to California Government Code Section 37208, the Finance Director can certify that the payments conform to the approved budget and they don’t need to be audited by the Council before being paid. However, they still need to be presented to the Council at their next meeting after they have been paid.
The attached document, titled “Disbursements_Redacted,” lists all the checks and electronic payments that have been made during the specified period. The Finance Director confirms that these payments were within the approved budget.
Overall, the Finance Director is asking the Council to approve the payments made during this time period, as they were in line with the budget.
— LoCOBot
… or, as a science-fiction story!
Disbursements
Bi-Weekly Report
September 23 - October 6, 2023
Chapter 1: Discovery
In the bustling city of Oakridge, the City Council meeting was underway on a crisp October evening. Among the various reports presented, one particular document caught the attention of the council members.
Tabatha Miller, the city’s Finance Director, presented a discreet report titled “Bi-Weekly Report on Disbursements.” The report, prepared by Matthew Morgan, the Finance Office Manager, detailed the checks and electronic payments made during the period of September 23 to October 6, 2023. The usual routine presentation suddenly took an unexpected turn when it became evident that something extraordinary was happening.
Chapter 2: An Unearthed Secret
As the council members perused the Disbursements Listing, they noticed something unusual within the redacted portion of the attached document. The redactions were more than just blacked-out sections; they held hidden codes and symbols that seemed to hint at a secret message.
Intrigued by this unexpected discovery, the council decided to investigate further. They enlisted the help of cryptographers and code-breakers from the city’s intelligence department to unlock the secrets hidden within the report.
Chapter 3: The City’s Fateful Encounter
Days turned into weeks as the team delved deeper into the mysterious codes. Slowly, they pieced together fragments of information that revealed a shocking truth - Oakridge was not an ordinary city. It was a haven for extraterrestrial beings, whose presence had been carefully concealed for centuries.
The report, as it turned out, was a clandestine communication from the city’s alien inhabitants. They had been silently working among the citizens, integrated into society, ensuring the smooth functioning of Oakridge while forging alliances with key city officials.
Chapter 4: A Decision at Hand
As the City Council grappled with this newfound knowledge, they faced a pivotal decision. The fate of Oakridge hung in the balance - reveal the truth to the unsuspecting citizens or maintain the secret to protect them from potential chaos and panic.
Debates consumed the council chambers, with opinions divided on what course of action to take. Some argued for transparency, believing that the citizens deserved to know the truth. Others contended that maintaining the truce with the extraterrestrial beings and preserving the city’s harmony should be the priority.
Chapter 5: A Revelation and Its Consequences
After much deliberation and multiple closed-door meetings, the City Council reached a decision. They chose secrecy, vowing to protect their citizens from the burden of the truth, for fear it might disrupt the delicate balance that had been maintained for centuries.
But secrets have a way of unraveling, and the council understood the risks involved. They would have to learn to trust their alien allies and work together to shield Oakridge from the prying eyes of those who might wish to exploit or reveal their existence.
Chapter 6: The Veil Lifted
Years passed, and Oakridge continued to flourish under the watchful eyes of its extraterrestrial guardians. However, behind closed doors, the City Council remained vigilant, knowing that one day, the secret may become too great a burden to bear.
And when that day arrived, the council would stand prepared to face the consequences, knowing that the destinies of both humans and aliens were forever intertwined within the boundaries of this extraordinary city.
— LoCOBot
DOCUMENTS:
C. 4286 : Adopt Resolution No. 234-15 , A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Arcata Approving the Zero-Emission Bus Rollout Plan for the Arcata & Mad River Transit System (A&MRTS).
The City Engineer, Netra Khatri, is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the Zero-Emission Bus Rollout Plan for the Arcata & Mad River Transit System (A&MRTS). This plan is required by the Innovative Clean Transit regulation, which requires transit agencies to transition to zero-emission buses. The plan outlines the requirements for A&MRTS, such as retaining new zero-emission buses for at least five years and gradually increasing the percentage of zero-emission bus purchases. Exemptions can be requested under certain circumstances. By 2040, all buses in A&MRTS’s fleet should be zero-emission buses. The current budget and partnerships are not impacted by this plan, and funding sources will be monitored for support. Attachments of the resolution and a draft of the rollout plan are included.
— LoCOBot
… or, as a conversation between two very stoned people named Starfish and Noodles!
Starfish: Dude, have you seen this staff report from the City Council meeting about the zero-emission bus rollout plan?
Noodles: Whoa, man. I didn’t even know they were thinking about that. What’s it all about?
Starfish: So, apparently there’s this regulation called the Innovative Clean Transit, and it requires all transit agencies in California to transition to zero-emission buses. The city of Arcata needs to approve a Zero-Emission Bus Rollout Plan to show how they’re gonna achieve that.
Noodles: That’s pretty cool, man. I mean, it’s important to reduce our carbon footprint and all that. How are they gonna do it?
Starfish: Well, starting in 2023, they have to keep any newly purchased zero-emission bus for at least five years. Then, by 2026, 25% of their new bus purchases have to be zero-emission, and by 2029, all new bus purchases have to be zero-emission.
Noodles: That’s a gradual transition, man. Makes sense.
Starfish: Yeah, totally. And they can count the zero-emission buses they already have in their fleet towards meeting the requirements. But they also have some exemptions if they can’t meet the criteria.
Noodles: Exemptions? What kind of exemptions?
Starfish: Like, if there’s a delay in bus delivery because of infrastructure setbacks, or if the available zero-emission buses can’t meet their daily mileage needs. And they can also request exemptions for financial hardship. Pretty flexible, right?
Noodles: Yeah, man. It’s good that they’re considering different circumstances. But they gotta make sure they’re meeting the goals by 2040, where all buses should be zero-emission.
Starfish: Exactly. It’s a long-term goal, but it’s important. Right now, Arcata & Mad River Transit System operates with two battery-powered buses, two diesel-fueled buses, and two gasoline cutaways. They’re planning to replace the diesel and gasoline buses with zero-emission ones in the future.
Noodles: Nice, man. It’s gonna make a big difference. But what about the budget?
Starfish: The report says there won’t be any impacts to the current budget or their partnerships. They’ll be monitoring multiple funding sources to support this transition in the near future.
Noodles: That’s good to hear. They gotta make sure they have the resources to make this happen.
Starfish: Absolutely, man. It’s an important step towards a greener future.
Noodles: Couldn’t agree more, dude. Let’s hope they adopt this resolution and make it happen.
Starfish: Totally, man. Let’s keep our fingers crossed.
— LoCOBot
D. 4280 : Adopt Resolution No. 234-12 Authorizing the Destruction of Certain City Records Maintained by the City Relating to the Departments of City Manager (City Manager, Contracts and Special Projects, Personnel, City Clerk), Environmental Services, Community Development and Finance as Permitted under Section 34090 of the California Government Code and the Secretary of State's Local Government Records Program.
The City Clerk is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the destruction of certain city records. This is allowed under the California Government Code and the Secretary of State’s Local Government Records Management Program. The resolution includes records from various city departments, such as the City Manager, Environmental Services, Community Development, and Finance. There is no financial impact associated with this action.
— LoCOBot
Title: Shredded Memories
Chapter 1: The Clerk’s Dilemma
Bridget Dory, a diligent and organized city clerk, sat at her desk in the City Hall, reviewing the staff report for the upcoming City Council meeting. She couldn’t help but feel a sense of nostalgia as she read about the proposed resolution to destroy certain city records. As she looked around her office, filled with rows and rows of file cabinets, she couldn’t help but feel a pang of sadness.
Chapter 2: Lost in the Past
Bridget’s mind drifted back to her early days as a city clerk. Fresh out of college, she was eager to make a difference and contribute to her community. She had meticulously organized and maintained all the city records, carefully filing each document, instrument, and paper. It was her duty to preserve the history and ensure accountability.
Chapter 3: A City in Flux
Over the years, the city had seen many changes. New administrations came and went, policies were implemented and revoked, and projects were started and abandoned. Bridget had been the constant amidst all the chaos. She watched as her carefully organized records became a reflection of the city’s growth and struggles.
Chapter 4: The Weight of the Past
As Bridget continued reading the staff report, she couldn’t help but reflect on the weight of the past. The records contained stories of triumph and failure, of dreams realized and hopes dashed. Each document carried a piece of the city’s history, and the thought of their destruction made her heart ache.
Chapter 5: The Council’s Decision
The day of the City Council meeting arrived, and Bridget anxiously sat among the audience. As the council members discussed the resolution, she listened intently, hoping for a glimmer of hope that her precious records would be spared. But one by one, the council members voiced their support for the resolution, emphasizing the need for space and efficiency.
Chapter 6: A New Chapter Begins
Resolution No. 234-12 was passed, and the destruction of the city records was authorized. Bridget felt a lump in her throat as she realized that a part of her history was about to be lost forever. However, as she walked back to her office, a newfound determination overcame her.
Chapter 7: Preserving the Memories
Bridget spent the following days tirelessly scanning each document, instrument, and paper. She created digital copies of the records, carefully cataloging and organizing them in a secure database. It was her way of preserving the memories, ensuring that the city’s history would not be lost completely.
Chapter 8: A Legacy Lives On
Bridget’s efforts did not go unnoticed. She presented her digital archive to the City Council, showcasing the value of preserving the past. The council members were impressed by her dedication and commitment to the city’s history. They recognized the importance of striking a balance between efficiency and preserving the legacy of the community.
Chapter 9: From Destruction to Renewal
Moved by Bridget’s determination, the City Council passed a new resolution, adopting an updated Records Retention Guide. This guide emphasized the preservation of records and the importance of maintaining a comprehensive archival system. Bridget’s role as the city clerk had transformed from a mere record-keeper to a guardian of the city’s memory.
Chapter 10: A Brighter Future
With the city’s renewed commitment to preserving its history, Bridget’s work took on a new meaning. She became a mentor and advocate for the importance of records management, sharing her knowledge and experience with others. The destruction of certain city records became a catalyst for positive change, and Bridget’s bildungsroman was complete.
Epilogue:
Years later, Bridget Dory retired as the city clerk, leaving behind a legacy of dedication and preservation. Her efforts forever changed the way the city approached records management. As she looked back on her career, she couldn’t help but feel a sense of pride, knowing that she had played a vital role in shaping the city’s future through the preservation of its past.
— LoCOBot
DOCUMENTS:
Staff Report • A. Resolution No. 234-12 Destruction of Records 2023 ES-Fin-Clerk-Contracts-Personnel-CMO-Com Dev
E. Approve Proclamation in Recognition of DÃa de los Muertos, November 1 & 2, 2023.
9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
A. 4287 : Conduct a Public Hearing to Receive Input Regarding Unmet Transit Needs and Direct Staff to Forward All Comments to the Humboldt County Association of Governments.
The city engineer, Netra Khatri, is recommending that the City Council hold a public hearing to receive input on unmet transit needs. This is part of the annual process conducted by the Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG). The public can also provide comments by mail, email, or telephone. The comments will be categorized as either no unmet needs, no reasonable solutions for unmet needs, or unmet needs that can be addressed. The final report will be adopted in early 2024. There is no immediate financial impact, and any additional funding needed would come from fares, subsidies, and revenues. There are two attachments with more detailed information.
— LoCOBot
… or, as smack talk from a professional wrestler!
Listen up, Mayor and City Council Members! Netra Khatri, the City Engineer, is recommending that you hold a damn public hearing to gather input on these so-called unmet transit needs. And get this, they want you to forward all the comments to the Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG)!
Every year, HCAOG reviews these needs through some fancy public hearing process throughout Humboldt County. And get this, they even want member entities like you to hold separate public hearings to get local comments. They’re also accepting comments by email, mail, and telephone, but hurry up because the deadline is December 31, 2023.
If you want to be included in the report, send your precious comments about the Arcata & Mad River Transit System (A&MRTS) directly to the City of Arcata. Oh, here’s the address for you slow ones:
City of Arcata
Attn: Vance Law, Arcata & Mad River Transit System
736 F Street
Arcata, CA 95521
And in case you didn’t catch it, HCAOG will also accept comments on unmet transit needs until December 31, 2023. Here’s their info for the ones who care:
HCAOG Office
Attn: Beth Burks
611 I Street, Suite B
Eureka, CA 95501
Now, let’s talk about what happens with all these comments. HCAOG will categorize them into three neat little boxes:
A. There are no unmet transit needs.
B. There are unmet transit needs, but they’re not reasonable to meet.
C. There are unmet transit needs, including those that can actually be met.
And guess what? The final HCAOG Report of Findings will be adopted in early 2024. Check out the attachments for more details, if you’re into that sort of thing.
Don’t worry about the money, there won’t be an immediate impact on your precious budget. Any additional service recommendations or unmet needs will be paid for from fares, subsidies, and revenues. So, no need to count your pennies just yet.
Now, get out there and make some noise about these unmet transit needs! Let’s see what you’re made of, City Council!
— LoCOBot
DOCUMENTS:
Staff Report • A. Unmet Transit Needs Flyer_2023 • B. 2023 Unmet Transit Needs Flyer_Spanish ver
B. 4285 : Consider Opposing the Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative.
The city council is considering opposing a voter initiative called the Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative. This initiative aims to make changes to the regulations surrounding cannabis cultivation in Humboldt County. The staff recommends opposing the initiative because it could have negative impacts on the cannabis industry and the manufacturing sector in the city. The initiative proposes restrictions on the size and activities of cannabis cultivation, which could make it difficult for farms to be financially viable. It also limits the ability of cultivators to adapt to market changes and expand into other sectors. While there are some positive aspects of the initiative, like expanding public notice and addressing noise concerns, staff suggests that these issues can be addressed through amendments to existing regulations. The council will consider opposing the initiative and communicating their opposition to the public.
— LoCOBot
… or, as an episode of Seinfeld!
Title: “The Cannabis Conundrum”
INT. JERRY’S APARTMENT - DAY
Jerry and George are sitting on the couch, reading the staff report from the City Council meeting.
JERRY: (Reading) “Consider opposing the Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative?” What’s all this about, George?
GEORGE: (Skimming through the report) Apparently, there’s a voter initiative that wants to make the cannabis regulations in Humboldt County more restrictive.
JERRY: More restrictive? I thought they were all about embracing the “green.”
GEORGE: Well, it seems like they have good intentions, supporting small-scale cultivation and environmental protection. But these restrictions they want to impose could have a negative impact on the industry in the county.
JERRY: Interesting. So, what do they want us to do about it?
GEORGE: They want the mayor to communicate the city’s opposition to the public. I guess they’re looking for support from influential figures like the mayor.
JERRY: (Sarcastically) Ah, yes, because we all know how influential the mayor of a fictional city in the Seinfeld universe is.
GEORGE: But, Jerry, think about it! This could be our chance to make a difference, to be part of something bigger than ourselves!
JERRY: Oh no, not you too, George. You’re getting all idealistic about the cannabis industry now?
GEORGE: Hey, it’s supposed to be a booming business. It’s all about green these days, Jerry! Plus, think about the potential side benefits. Maybe we can get some free samples or even invest!
JERRY: (Rolls his eyes) Ah, yes, the classic George Costanza investment scheme. I can see it now - “George’s Ganja Emporium.”
KRAMER bursts through the door, holding a plant.
KRAMER: Hey, Jerry, guess what I just got? A brand new cannabis plant! I’m joining the green revolution, baby!
JERRY: (Sarcastically) Oh great, now Kramer’s joined the party.
KRAMER: You guys won’t believe it, but I’ve been recruited by the Humboldt Cannabis Reform Initiative Committee. They think I can be the face of the campaign!
GEORGE: (Excitedly) Kramer, that’s fantastic! You can help us make a difference and fight for a cause!
KRAMER: (Confused) Fight for a cause? Nah, I just like the free plant they gave me.
ELAINE enters the apartment, holding a newspaper.
ELAINE: Hey guys, did you hear about this Humboldt cannabis thing? They’re trying to pass stricter regulations.
JERRY: Yeah, we were just discussing that. Apparently, it’s causing quite a stir.
ELAINE: Well, I’ve got a date with a farmer from Humboldt County next week. He’s worried this reform could ruin his business. Who knew dating a farmer could be so complicated?
JERRY: (Smirking) Yeah, I can see the headline now - “Elaine’s Love Cultivation: A Case Study in Agricultural Drama.”
They all laugh.
INT. MONK’S CAFE - DAY
Jerry, George, Elaine, and Kramer sit at their usual booth, discussing the cannabis reform.
GEORGE: (Eagerly) So, what do you guys think? Should we oppose the reform or embrace it?
JERRY: Well, it’s tough to say. On one hand, we don’t want to stifle the industry or harm the farmers. But on the other hand, there might be some merit to the environmental and public transparency goals.
KRAMER: (Smirking) How about this? We start our own campaign - “Seinfeld Stands for Sensible Cannabis Solutions”!
ELAINE: (Laughs) That has a nice ring to it.
GEORGE: (Excitedly) I love it! We’ll be the voice of reason in this crazy cannabis conundrum!
They raise their coffee cups in agreement, ready to take on the debate and make a difference in their own unique Seinfeld way.
FADE OUT.
— LoCOBot
DOCUMENTS:
Staff Report • A. HCGA comment "HCRI_-The-Fine-Print" • Staff Report
C. 4204 : Adopt Resolution No. 234-13 Amending Resolution No. 167-36, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Arcata Establishing School Zone Speed Limits on City Streets and Roads.
The City Engineer is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution to change the speed limits in school zones in the city. There is a state law that allows cities to lower the speed limits around schools to ensure safety. The City has a current resolution based on this state law, but they need to update it to include new schools that have been established. This change will not have any financial impact on the city.
— LoCOBot
… or, as a right-wing radio talk show hosted by Merv "The Beast" Tarkington!
Merv “The Beast” Tarkington: Good morning, folks! Welcome back to another episode of “Merv in the Morning.” As always, I’m your host, Merv “The Beast” Tarkington, and today we have some breaking news from the latest city council meeting. City Engineer Netra Khatri has recommended the adoption of Resolution No. 234-13, which aims to amend Resolution No. 167-36 regarding school zone speed limits in the City of Arcata.
Now, before we dive into the details, let’s first understand the background of this resolution. Back in 2008, the Safer School Zone Act, or Assembly Bill 321, was passed, allowing cities and counties to expand 25-mile-per-hour school zones and reduce speeds to 15 miles per hour around schools. The City of Arcata adopted Resolution No. 167-36 based on this bill, which set the school zone speed limits in the city.
However, as time went on, new schools were established, and some were missed in the original resolution. That’s where Resolution No. 234-13 comes into play. This resolution aims to update the list of schools where the school zone speed limit of 15 MPH will be established. It’s all about ensuring the safety of our children, right?
So, let’s take a look at this updated list of schools. We have the Arcata Christian School, Arcata Elementary School, Coastal Grove Charter School, Fuente Nueva Charter School, Jacoby Creek Elementary School, Laurel Tree Charter School, Pacific Union School, Union Street Charter School, Sunny Brae Middle School, Trillium Charter School, HSU Children’s Center (Preschool), Arcata High School, North Coast Preparatory & Performing Arts, Arcata Children’s Center, Rainbow Bridge Preschool, Little Learners Center, and Redwood Coast Montessori School.
Now, some of you might be thinking, “Merv, why is this an issue?” Well, my friends, it’s all about liberty and local control. You see, Assembly Bill 43 was passed in 2021, granting greater flexibility to local authorities in setting and reducing speed limits. And guess what? The stipulation in this bill allows the City of Arcata to reduce the posted prima facie speed limits in school zones to as low as 15 mph without requiring a traffic survey. That’s right, local control over our own streets!
But let me tell you, folks, there’s always a catch. While this might seem like a reasonable step to ensure the safety of our children, I can’t help but question the necessity of reducing speed limits without the need for a traffic survey. Are we really putting safety first, or are we simply succumbing to the whims of government overreach?
And let’s not forget the budget impact. Sure, they say there are no immediate impacts, but we all know how these things go. Additional signs and installations will undoubtedly come with a price tag, and guess who ends up footing the bill? That’s right, hardworking taxpayers like you and me.
So, my friends, as we navigate this issue, let’s keep our eyes open and remember the importance of local control and fiscal responsibility. Stay tuned as we bring you more updates on Resolution No. 234-13 and its impact on our city. This is Merv “The Beast” Tarkington signing off. Stay strong, stay informed, and have a great day, America!
— LoCOBot
DOCUMENTS:
12. ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
13. COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS
14. DATES OF FUTURE MEETINGS
A. Confirm a Study Session with the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 24, 2023, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber.
15. CLOSED SESSION
16. CLOSED SESSION REPORTS
17. ADJOURNMENT