###

Over a dozen representatives of the local arts sector filled the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors chambers on Tuesday to urge the board to maintain critical funding for art and theater programs made possible by the county’s transient occupancy tax (TOT). 

The emotional testimony came in response to a proposal from staff that sought to keep $880,000 in funding generated by Measure J, a TOT hike approved by voters in 2022, in the county’s General Fund to help stabilize the county budget, rather than allocating the funds to outside organizations for various arts- and film-related projects.

During a presentation to the board, Deputy County Administrative Officer Jessica Maciel reiterated that the county is facing a $12.4 million budget shortfall for the current fiscal year. The extra $880,000 would “ensure that resources would be available, should more emergent needs arise in future fiscal years, providing protections for critical essential services,” according to the staff report. The TOT funding allocations are detailed in the chart below. 

Speaking during public comment, Leslie Castellano, executive director of the Ink People Center for the Arts, said the funding provided by Measure J helped the Ink People establish the Underserved Communities Fund, which offers support to BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color), LGBTQ+ and other underserved people looking to create art projects that benefit the greater community. She urged the board to keep the funding in place.

“I want to thank you for your bold decision last year to invest – really for the first time – in the arts and culture sector as a way of, you know, really seeing what kind of good work could be done through arts and culture in terms of addressing economic development, addressing public safety [and] addressing public health,” she said. “I think your investment is yielding results. … You can see it as an investment in the people who are in your community and their well-being.”

Cassandra Hesseltine, executive director of the Humboldt-Del Norte Film Commission, also encouraged the board to look at the funding allocation as an investment in the community’s future. She noted that the Star Wars-themed festival Forest Moon Days, which received funding from Measure J, brought in “over 6,500 attendees [to] the region.”

“We would like to have an increase in our funding actually, believe it or not, because we think we can help bring in more money,” she said. “Our return on investment for your regular funding that you guys give us is 500 percent.”

Johnson | Screenshot

Similarly, Calder Johnson, managing artistic director for the North Coast Repertory Theatre, asked the board to think of the arts as service and a source of enrichment to the community. “When we start talking about arts, culture, events [and] gatherings … we’ve seen the data showing how much of an effect this has on mental health, physical health, social health, community well-being [and] suicide prevention. … This is a service.”

Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal expressed his own appreciation for the arts sector, noting that he is “a huge fan of Star Wars” (First District Supervisor Rex Bohn, earlier, claimed never to have seen a Star Wars movie), but ultimately urged the board to direct the funding back to the General Fund to prevent layoffs.

“We are looking at cuts across the county,” Honsal said. “I know we need to work on generating more revenue – I’m all about that – but right now, we may have to lay off people this year.”

Following public comment, Third District Supervisor Mike Wilson suggested the board keep half the $880,000 in the General Fund and allocate the other half to the programs, as previously planned.

“I think these budgets are moral decisions in a lot of ways about what’s important,” Wilson continued. “They are investments, and I do believe that the arts … it’s just that we’re coming into some pretty tight times.”

Second District Supervisor Michelle Bushnell offered her gratitude to the people who spoke in public comment but said she was leaning toward staff’s recommendation to keep the funding in the General Plan.

“[Fourth District Supervisor] Natalie [Arroyo] and I went through the budget ad hoc process and it was very painful,” Bushnell said. “We had to tell each department that we’re looking at layoffs and we’re looking at cuts and we won’t be able to fund essential services,” Bushnell said. “While I do think – and know – that the arts are so important to our community … I just can’t right now knowing that we have a budget talks in less than a month and we’re going to tell people that they can’t fund their departments.”

Arroyo also acknowledged the importance of being “really strategic about the investments we’re making” and suggested that the board create an ad hoc committee to look into the issue further. 

“I kind of hate to say ‘Let’s do another ad hoc!’ but perhaps that’s one approach we can take [to provide] a little more evaluation of this funding stream for the purpose of generating revenue,” she said. “We’ve reined back a lot of other expenses around tourism … but we also need to look at ways to make revenue and catch up.”

Arroyo made a motion to create an ad hoc and volunteered to serve. The action was seconded by Wilson. 

Bushnell asked if Wilson if he would be willing to sit on the ad hoc committee but quickly volunteered to do it herself, joking that he and Arroyo “think too much alike.”

The motion passed 5-0.

Measure Z Funding Recommendations

The board also approved a list of funding allocations for projects funded by Measure Z, the county’s half-percent sales tax intended to maintain public safety and essential services, totaling $4.08 million. 

Along with the rest of the county’s budget, Measure Z funds have dried up in recent years due to a reduction in economic activity across the county, which has cut millions of dollars from the county’s projected income. At the end of last year, the board made the difficult decision to cut funding for the county’s Mobile Intervention Services Team (MIST), which serves homeless people experiencing mental health crises, to maintain essential county services. 

This round of funding allocations was no different. The Measure Z Citizen Advisory Committee went through an extensive ranking process to develop the following list of recommendations:

• $500,000 for Public Works to prep chip and seal two miles of Mattole Road.
• $1,100,000 for Public Works to replace three pieces of heavy equipment.
• $197,901 for the City of Fortuna to reinstate its school resource office.
• $188,324 for the Sheriff’s Office to continue using the evacuation software platform Genasys.
• $2,100,000 to the Humboldt County Fire Chiefs’ Association for equipment, training, dispatch fees and planning.

Bohn said he was happy to see a chunk of funding going to his district because it usually “doesn’t get anything.” 

“We’re in a tough time,” he said. “We’re lucky we got what we got. If it’s creative bookkeeping, we’re lucky with what we got.”

Quincey | Screenshot

Deputy County Administrative Officer Sean Quincey warned that next year’s funding allocations will be even more sparse than this year. “We’ve had a lot more difficult conversations in terms of how the pie is getting split,” Quincey said. “Next year, we don’t expect to have nearly as much funding available for Measure Z. And if there’s no change in our process … there’ll be another difficult year full of difficult discussions and conversations.”

However, Quincey noted that there was $45,665 left in the current round of funding. The board was divided on whether the money should be given to Public Works for additional road repair work or to the City of Arcata to help fund a juvenile diversion program.

Bushnell made a motion to approve the list of funding recommendations and allocate the $45,665 to Public Works, which was seconded by Bohn. 

Wilson made a case for Arcata’s juvenile diversion program, suggesting that the board give the remaining funds to the city and, if it can’t come up with the matching funds needed for the program, the $45,665 will go to Public Works. Bushnell and Bohn agreed and the amended motion passed in a unanimous 5-0 vote.

Issues at the Trinidad Rock Quarry

At the beginning of Tuesday’s meeting, the board presented certificates of appreciation to representatives of Mercer Fraser Company, Granite Construction and Operating Engineers Local 3, all of whom donated supplies and services to help Public Works staff and the Westhaven Community Services District with the installation of road humps on Sixth Avenue in Westhaven. 

The item appeared on the board’s consent calendar, which is typically approved in a single motion along with the rest of the calendar without much discussion. However, the item drew an unexpected amount of attention from the public as several community members seized the opportunity to call out Mercer Fraser for creating an alleged “environmental disaster” at the rock quarry near Trinidad. 

Numerous speakers, including residents of the communal living village “Yee Haw,” claimed Mercer Fraser has not had a permit to operate the quarry in nearly two decades, while others alleged that environmental degradation at the quarry is threatening air quality and nearby watersheds. 

“We’re not okay over there on Quarry Road – the situation is not okay,” said one speaker, who only identified herself as Claire. “The plants, the animals and the people are all being impacted. I look forward to this being on the agenda at another moment where we can go further into the paperwork documenting the disregard, documenting the unpermitted status [and] documenting the impact on the waterways and on air quality. It’s all there.”

Fifth District Supervisor Steve Madrone acknowledged that there are “lots of issues going on in the quarry area,” but did not speak directly to the commenters’ concerns.

“I know sometimes it’s hard to separate things, but when somebody does a good action, I believe they deserve recognition for that,” he said. “[This project] was a very important thing for the community. That doesn’t mean there aren’t issues at the quarry, I think we all know that there are. … [T]he county is going to be engaging with Mercer Fraser in regards to things that need to be taken care of.”

The consent calendar was ultimately approved 5-0.

###

Other notable bits from today’s meeting:

• The board approved a request from the Fish and Game Advisory Committee to look into the possibility of installing a fish cleaning station at the “Jimmy Smith” boat launch property in Fields Landing.
• The board also approved a proclamation recognizing Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons (MMIP) week in Humboldt County. According to the FBI’s National Crime Information Center, an estimated 5,203 indigenous girls and women were reported missing in 2021, “disappearing at a rate equal to more than two and a half times their estimated share of the U.S. population.” Julia Oliviera, an MMIP investigator with the Yurok Tribe, thanked the board for the proclamation, noting that she is the only dedicated MMIP investigator in the state. “I hope soon there will be more of me out there,” she said.
• The board approved a resolution in support of the Rumble of the Redwoods airshow, which will take place at the Humboldt County Airport on Aug. 10 and 11.

The California Supreme Court will decide in the coming weeks whether to remove a sweeping anti-tax measure from the November ballot, blocking an effort to increase the requirements for implementing taxes, fees and other government charges in the state before voters have a chance to weigh in.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, the Legislature and others sued last fall to stop the business community-sponsored initiative, arguing that it amounts to an illegal attempt to revise the California Constitution and would impair essential government functions.

With a June 27 deadline to set the ballot for the November election, the court must rule soon about whether to allow the proposed measure, formally known as the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act, to proceed.

At an hour-long hearing this morning in San Francisco, the justices grappled extensively with a provision that would require the Legislature to seek approval from the voters for any new or higher state tax. Currently, lawmakers can raise taxes by a two-thirds vote of both chambers.

“From the founding of the state, the Legislature has had the supreme power of taxation,” Margaret Prinzing, an attorney representing the state, told the court. “This measure would revoke that power for the first time in the history of California and instead put it in the hands of the voters.”

Prinzing argued that, rather than simply amending tax law in the state constitution, this would fundamentally restructure how government operates — a more substantial change that can only be proposed by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature or through a constitutional convention.

Justice Goodwin Liu pressed the lawyer for the initiative’s proponent, the California Business Roundtable, about that idea repeatedly during the hour-long hearing. He asked at one point whether giving voters authority over state taxes would create a fourth branch of government.

“Doesn’t this measure essentially shift us from a republican form of government far more strongly towards a direct democracy, given how fundamental the taxing power is?” Liu said.

Thomas Hiltachk, the lawyer representing the business group, asserted that the power of the legislative branch is shared with the public and thus the Legislature has no unilateral power to impose taxes.

“Our constitution, since its inception, has stated that all political power is inherent in the people. It has stated that the people have the power to reform and alter their government whenever they decide it needs reform,” Hiltachk said, adding later, “The people have the last word.”

The proposed initiative would broadly make it more challenging to raise taxes in California, including by also increasing the margin to pass a voter-initiated special tax at the local level, to two-thirds from a simple majority.

Other consequential provisions — which could upend the operation of California government at every level — would restrict how officials can calculate the cost of fees that fund public services and programs and reclassify some of those charges as taxes. That would prohibit administrative agencies from setting these levies, requiring the Legislature or local governments to turn to the voters to adjust them.

Proponents say their initiative is a necessary crackdown on loopholes created by legislators and court rulings that weakened previous voter-approved tax accountability measures and allowed an unelected administrative bureaucracy to flourish. It has been heavily supported by the real estate industry and a private ambulance company, which frequently battle local governments over taxes, fees and assessments to fund public services.

But since it secured its eligibility more than a year ago, Democratic politicians, organized labor and other opponents have worked feverishly to undermine the initiative and toss it from the ballot.

In addition to the lawsuit, legislators voted in the final weeks of session last summer to put a competing measure on the ballot that would flip the California Business Roundtable initiative’s own higher standards against it, requiring that changes to the threshold for approving state and local taxes pass by that same margin. That would mean it needed to secure two-thirds support from the electorate, rather than a simple majority, a high hurdle for a statewide measure.

At this morning’s hearing, attorney Prinzing argued that the proposed overhaul to how governments can raise revenue would hinder their ability to respond quickly to fiscal emergencies and might change the nature of what taxes are even possible in California, by transferring those decisions away from experts who can consider them within the full context of budgets and spending priorities.

“The voters simply don’t have the capacity to do that,” she said.

Hiltachk responded that the state has faced emergencies in the past and recovered from most of them without ever choosing to raise taxes.

“If the Legislature believes it needs a more long-term solution, it can certainly ask the voters,” he said.

The justices appeared sympathetic to the state’s arguments about the practicality of the initiative. Liu in particular noted how “vast” its impact would be, potentially affecting everything from traffic tickets to library fines.

“If you wanted a measure that spoke to the concerns that you raised, that would be a different measure,” Liu told Hiltachk.

But several justices expressed uncertainty about the appropriateness of deciding the legality of the initiative prior to the election, as well the state’s request to strike down the entire measure rather than considering each provision on its own merits.

Hiltachk urged the court not to thrust itself into a political judgment and allow the voters to have their say.

“This tug-of-war over taxation has been going on for over 100 years,” he said.

###

The CalMatters Ideas Festival takes place June 5-6! Find out more and get your tickets at this link.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Press release from California State Parks:

 In the interest of public safety and resource protection, College Cove in Trinidad State Beach will be closed to access and use on May 15th-22nd and May 29th-June 5th. This closure is necessary for public safety while crews work on trail restoration. The temporary closure order will apply to the parking area and trail within the unit. Other popular trails within Trinidad State Beach will remain open during this closure. 

With the exception of park employees and approved contractors, no person shall be in the above-mentioned closure area for any reason, day or night during the times listed. Authorized emergency vehicles, Department of Parks and Recreation personnel, vehicles, and equipment required to perform the restoration work are exempt from this Order.

Californians pay more at the pump than residents of any other state — an average of $5.34 a gallon for regular unleaded, compared to the national average of $3.64, according to AAA. And in some counties, the sticker shock is even worse — $6.80 in Alpine, $6.29 in Mono and $5.85 in Humboldt, for example.

Statewide, gas prices have jumped 55 cents a gallon from this time a year ago.

It’s also a little more than a year ago when Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to crack down on windfall oil profits became law. So what’s up?

On Tuesday, the Senate energy committee asked California Energy Commission officials that very question. Citing the “crippling” effect high gas prices have on low-income Californians and commuters, legislators wanted to know if the law’s increased reporting requirements on oil companies have helped the commission determine whether to recommend capping oil profits and penalizing oil companies that exceed the cap. Any recommendation isn’t expected until later this year.

“We want to have the confidence that the solutions will bring relief to Californians at the pump are real and not just aspirational,” said Sen. Steven Bradford, an Inglewood Democrat and chairperson of the committee. “Far too often, we shoot first and ask questions later.”

Though the commission is still gathering data, what it and its new watchdog division found so far was that the three times gas prices notably spiked in the last five years (in October 2019, October 2022 and September 2023), oil company profits rose. Environmental fees and state and federal taxes, however, remained relatively flat during that periods.

“Price spikes are profit spikes for the oil industry,” said Tai Milder, director of the Division of Petroleum Market Oversight.

What causes gas prices to be so volatile? One reason is the price of crude oil, which can be swung by global events such as the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. These wholesales prices, in turn, impact retail prices. But while both typically rise in tandem, they do not fall together — when wholesale prices drop, pump prices are often slow to follow.

Siva Gunda, vice chairperson of the energy commission, describes the pattern as “up like a rocket but down like a feather.”

Still, Gunda said that there is no clear evidence that oil companies are engaging in price gouging, but that there is also no industry incentive to ease price spikes.

“None of the industry in our good-faith discussions disputes that profits go up a lot. So who’s to decide how high you can go during those times?” said Gunda. “That’s what we’re trying to think through. Given that this is such an important public benefit, how do we ensure that there’s a cutoff?”

At today’s hearing of the Senate energy committee, Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president and chief executive officer of Western States Petroleum Association, pushed back against caps and penalties. She told CalMatters that they wouldn’t reduce prices, but have “the absolute opposite effect.” To avoid incurring penalties on profits, companies will restrict supply, which will drive up costs.

“It’s two to three times more expensive to run a refinery in California than anywhere else in the world. It comes to a point where it becomes uneconomic,” Reheis-Boyd said. In 2023, California had 14 refineries compared to 43 in 1982.

Instead, Reheis-Boyd argues that legislators should look into investing more into the oil supply chain to increase supply, such as lifting restrictions on the production of crude oil in California.

Some reasons for higher prices are built into the calendar.

Service stations in California have already switched to the more expensive summer fuel blend, formulated to reduce ozone emissions — in Southern California on Feb. 1, and in Northern California on March 1, according to the energy commission. Last year, Newsom pushed to go back to winter fuel sooner than the usual Oct. 31 to help bring down prices.

And on July 1, the state’s excise gas tax will increase by 1.9 cents to 59.6 cents a gallon to keep up with inflation. The tax on diesel fuel will rise by 1.3 cents to 45.4 cents a gallon.

###

The CalMatters Ideas Festival takes place June 5-6! Find out more and get your tickets at this link.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

UPDATE, May 8, 4:13 p.m.:

After more than an hour of discussion, which included the addition of some new conditions of approval by staff as well as public comments both in opposition and support, the California Coastal Commission unanimously approved the project.

In granting the Harbor District’s permit application, the commission cleared away one of the last remaining administrative hurdles for Nordic Aquafarms’ proposed fish-production factory on the Samoa Peninsula.

The coastal development permit will allow the Harbor District to upgrade its seawater intake infrastructure in Humboldt Bay, install new underground water pipelines along the bay, perform a variety of environmental mitigation activities and, eventually, withdraw up to 11.8 million gallons of water per day for tenants in the future National Marine Research and Innovation Park.

Appearing remotely, Harbor District Director of Development Rob Holmlund explained that while nearly 12 million gallons per day may sound like a lot of water, it represents just a tiny fraction — roughly 1/6,000th — of the 20 billion gallons exchanged in Humboldt Bay during each and every six-hour tidal cycle. 

In presenting the project to the commission, staff acknowledged that the water intake system will have a substantial adverse impact to marine life in the bay, sucking in tiny fish eggs, larvae and other planktonic organisms, mitigation measures can fully offset the resulting loss in productivity.

The prescribed mitigation measures include:

• the removal of nearly 1,000 derelict, creosote-treated piles and crossbeams from an old dock in Fields Landing,
• the eradication of an invasive species (particularly Spartina densiflora, aka European beachgrass) from salt marsh habitats around Humboldt Bay, and
• tidal marsh restoration on district-owned property at the foot of Bay Street, on Eureka Slough.

Commissioner Mike Wilson recounted his long journey with the Harbor District’s Redwood Marine Terminal II property, including his tenure as a chair of the Harbor District’s board of commissioners, during which it was discovered that roughly 4 million gallons of toxic pulping liquor were being stored in deteriorated storage tanks at the former pulp mill site.

Wilson said that while this project will have negative impacts, that’s true of all forms of food productions and he believes that, with the mitigation measures, the benefits will ultimately outweigh the costs.

###

Original post:

###

PREVIOUSLY:

• Lawsuit Challenges Humboldt County’s Environmental Impact Report for Nordic Aquafarms Project; Five Appeals Filed With Coastal Commission
• Water Quality Board Awards Wastewater Discharge Permit for Nordic Aquafarms’ Planned Peninsula Facility
• Coastal Commission OKs Wastewater Discharge Permit for Nordic Aquafarms’ Onshore Fish Farm
• Nordic Aquafarms Celebrates Coastal Commission Denial of Five Appeals to Samoa Fish Farm

###

The California Coastal Commission will hold its monthly three-day meeting up in Crescent City this week, and on Wednesday commissioners are set to consider permitting some major upgrades to old seawater intake systems located in Humboldt Bay.

The permit is being sought by the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District, but expect some Norwegians to tune in to the livestream feed. That’s because the infrastructure upgrades are necessary for the operation of Nordic Aquafarms’ planned onshore fish farm, which is slated for development on the Harbor District-owned Redwood Marine Terminal II property.

That property formerly hosted the Samoa pulp mill, which used the two seawater intake systems (called “sea chests”) to support mill operations. In order to meet the needs of future tenants, including Nordic’s $650 million recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) facility, the Harbor District seeks permission to eventually withdraw up to 11.8 million gallons of water per day, or 8.25 8,250 gallons per minute.

The District’s proposal also calls for refurbishing the intake structures, adding mesh screens, installing water delivery pipelines on upland portions of the project site and building supporting infrastructure needed to convey seawater to other future tenants of the property. The District’s long-term plans for the site call for development of a National Marine Research and Innovation Park.

Coastal Commission staff is recommending approval of the project, but only with a dozen special conditions, including mitigation measures to protect marine life and approval from both the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (NCRWQCB).

A staff report notes that the project would impact marine life in Humboldt Bay, which is home to a wide variety of plants and critters, including several special-status species such as longfin smelt and several types of salmon. The Harbor District’s proposed screening systems “are designed to avoid or substantially reduce impacts to these listed species,” staff says, “as the screen mesh size and the intake water velocities are expected to essentially eliminate impingement, which occurs when larger marine organisms are trapped or injured on the screens due to the velocity of the water intake.”

But the intake system would still suck in smaller organisms, including the larvae of longfin smelt, which are listed as threatened under the state Endangered Species Act. The CDFW has investigated this issue and recommends requiring the Harbor District to restore 5.89 acres of “highly productive habitat” in the Bay.

The Coastal Commission received 19 letters on the matter — some in favor of the project, some opposed. In the latter category, environmental nonprofit Humboldt Waterkeeper (formerly called Humboldt Baykeeper) raises concerns about leftover industrial contamination along the shoreline, where the Harbor District plans to construct a 4,650-foot-long pipeline trench.

Frank Egger, president of the North Coast Rivers Alliance, argues that with the billion-dollar Pacific Coast fishing industry “collapsing,” the potential for fish entrainment alone should make the project a “non-starter.” Other letters contend that Nordic’s plans and the associated environmental review have been “piecemealed” and are thus insufficient.

Several emails in support of the project highlight the value of redeveloping a brownfield site into a fish farm and aquaculture innovation center.

The Coastal Commission is scheduled to consider two other Humboldt-specific items on Wednesday. Local attorney Russell Clanton and his wife want to tear down an existing home on Stagecoach Road in Trinidad and build a larger one. And PG&E wants to inspect and repair an underground gas transmission pipeline located in the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary. Staff recommend the commission approve both, with conditions.

Meetings of the Coastal Commission can be live-streamed on cal-span.org, and anyone wishing to comment can submit a speaker request on the commission’s website.

Press release from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife:

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) has been detected for the first time in California’s deer and elk. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received confirmation on May 6 samples collected from two deer, one in Madera County near Yosemite Lakes and the other in Inyo County, near Bishop. The deer in Madera County was found dead due to unknown causes and the Inyo County deer was found dead after a vehicle collision.

CWD is a fatal neurologic disease in cervid animals such as deer, elk, moose and reindeer that has been detected in free-ranging cervids from 34 states, including California, and five Canadian provinces as well as Scandinavia. It affects the brain, causing progressive damage and eventually, death. There is no effective treatment or vaccine to combat this disease.

There appears to be no known link between CWD and human disease, although a similar prion animal disease, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) or mad cow disease in cattle, has been linked to fatal disease in humans through the consumption of infected beef. As a result the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend keeping the agents of all known prion diseases from entering the human food chain (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chronic Wasting Disease).

CDFW has been monitoring California elk and deer populations for CWD through lymph node sampling and testing since 2000, testing over 6,500 deer and elk, and has been working to increase surveillance efforts, with the help of hunters, taxidermists and meat processors since 2018. 

Clinical signs of the disease include progressive weight loss, clumsy movements and lack of coordination, listlessness, drooling, excessive thirst or urination and behavioral changes. Once these symptoms develop death occurs quickly.

The disparate locations of these two detections indicates that CWD has probably been present in California for some time, since the incubation period can be months to years.

“CWD infected animals can excrete infectious prions before clinical signs appear and these prions can persist in the environment for years, making it very difficult to prevent or control the spread once it has been introduced,” says, Dr. Brandon Munk, CDFW’s wildlife veterinarian who oversees CWD surveillance and response efforts. “The public can help limit the spread of CWD by reporting any signs of illness in deer and elk populations, and hunters should strongly consider testing their harvested deer or elk.”

CDFW continues to provide surveillance, response, long-term management plans and public outreach and education through their “No Time to Waste” campaign to limit the spread. Hunters can assist in the efforts by voluntarily participating in CDFW’s statewide CWD surveillance and sampling efforts and encouraging other hunters to participate.

To report a sick deer or elk: Wildlife Mortality Reporting

To learn more and find out how to get your cervid harvest tested: Chronic Wasting Disease

Press release from the Cal Poly Humboldt administration:

The University wants to acknowledge that this has been an extremely challenging time for Cal Poly Humboldt. It has also been a very emotional time for our campus community and beyond, and we have much work in front of us to reset, rebuild, and heal. To clarify misinformation and rumors, here’s a timeline of the events beginning on April 22. We invite people to continue to ask questions and more information will be coming.

The University’s Time, Place, and Manner policy is content-neutral, approved by the University Senate, and fully supportive of First Amendment protections. In fact, this policy exists to protect freedom of speech and assembly while also protecting the rights of the entire campus community to a secure environment that is conducive to our educational purpose.

These approved policies, which have had extensive review, should be supported and enforced regardless of context. There is no First Amendment right to enter and occupy a building to stage a protest and it is a clear violation of the University’s Time, Place, and Manner policy.

• Multiple people called the University Police Department (UPD) concerned due to the actions of the people who were protesting in Siemens Hall on the first day of the protest. Several staff members asked the people who were protesting to leave the building prior to UPD arriving on the scene. The people who were protesting refused.
• UPD officers were inside the building with the people who were protesting and asked if they could facilitate a protest in the public space of the Quad, where it would have been a lawful assembly. Those requests were rebuffed by the people who were protesting.
• Tents in hallways and barricades were being assembled in front of exit doors, and vandalism of the building’s interior had already begun before UPD arrived.
• Students, faculty, and staff who were not part of the protest were evacuated with the assistance of UPD. Classes were canceled out of safety concerns because exits were already being barricaded.
• UPD ordered the people who were trespassing to leave the building. They refused to vacate the building and construction of barricades continued. UPD called for additional police presence on campus.
• Efforts to clear those barricades in the lobby were met with assault on officers. Police were attempting to enforce a lawful order, arrest those who were assaulting officers, and clear the building. Several people who were protesting and police officers were injured. Additional police officers were called from throughout the county.
• On the first night, administrators were told that if law enforcement was removed that the protesters would leave the building.
• The Provost, Vice Provost, and Dean Crane went into the building twice on Monday. The first time to check on the safety of the protesters, establish dialog, and to see if any needed medical attention. The people who were protesting offered a set of demands.
• The second time the Provost, Vice Provost and Dean Crane entered on Monday night was to announce that law enforcement was leaving the scene and that protesters could leave, as they agreed, without consequences. The people who were protesting shouted the Provost down and threw water at her.
• The UPD Chief of Police recommended that law enforcement depart. President Jackson concurred. Law enforcement left the scene. The people who were protesting then reneged on their promise to vacate the building and continued to build barricades.
• On Tuesday, the focus was on deescalation, and administrators waited for the protesters to keep their promise to leave the building. They refused. Efforts to dialog occurred throughout the day with the protesters both inside and outside the building. The people who were protesting refused to let any administrators into the building.
• After Tuesday, administrators realized the extent of the damage to the building and leaving without consequences was taken off the table. Nelson Hall East was then also occupied, doors were barricaded and protesters controlled who was allowed in or out of the building.
• Throughout the week, there were many attempts to get the protesters to agree to leave the buildings, beyond those efforts that were widely discussed. Faculty, staff, and administrators were actively talking with protesters throughout the week.
• We took the protesters’ demands seriously, and researched those demands and answered them to the best of our ability on the 26th of April.
• A total of 12 buildings were vandalized. The John Van Duzer Theatre, Music A, Art A, Founders Hall, Van Matre Hall, Harry Griffith Hall, Student Business Services, Forestry, and the Gutswurrak Student Activities Center were either broken into or attempted to be broken into. Several others were defaced. Fortunately University staff were able to retake these buildings.
• To date, the initial estimate is that there is more than $1.9M in financial impact, which includes physical damage to the campus and emergency operations. This number is not final due to the campus still assessing physical damage, costs to restore the damage, and gathering a full picture of the financial impact.
• It was difficult to dialog with the protesters to leave the building because there was no clear leadership. There were only a few students that began the protest that were on site during the arrests, which is what made ending the protest without arrest so difficult.
• More than half of those arrested were not students.
• The tagging and efforts to reoccupy buildings on campus have continued since the arrests, which is why the campus has not yet been reopened.