Yeah, the Polish Dog and sauerkraut. Sigh. Smart man, your hubby. Might be a keeper.

Well, the food court, yeah, but you miss a lot of other grocery commodities at great prices and tons of merchandise for larger families. Yeah, the giant mayo jar gets …

I can’t understand this perspective. Every neighborhood has advantages and disadvantages. Private property values are already inflated by their proximity to the university, and now those same residents want special …

This is the correct answer.

I suppose it depends on the road. Restricting the parking does not exclude others from using the road, just parking there. In Humboldt, that particular small road probably does not …

i miss the original Polish sausage with kraut on the side, your choice of how much. Haven’t been to that court of food in a while. Miss those food felonies.

Have you thought of getting a pet anteater?

Says the guy pushing for more subsidies of private transportation (which includes restrictive building and zoning requirements). Let me guess, mommy and daddy bought you one for your sweet sixteenth.

There’s a reason they call it “bumming a ride.” Definitely explains why you’re so into government spending.

My soul cries out for the return of the Polish Sausage and the churro.

Which is fine, but that doesn’t mean we need to subsidize it or bend over backwards to make it convenient and cheap.

I made it through college without a car as did most people I knew. We still made it to the beach and backpacking.

Not should they. Parking is not a priority.

That’s a good thing. It’s high time we taxpayers stop all subsidies for private transportation (including free parking).

I’m fine with that as long as everyone pays equally for the permits, including the NIMBY residents who happen to live nearby.

As they should. That is their responsibility.

In this case the residents should have to pay a special tax to maintain their specific roads. I should not have to pay taxes that fund someone else’s “resident only” …

If you need to be in Fortuna, Del Norte, Eureka, Saint Bernards, etc., an hour after school gets out, a bike ain’t gonna cut it. Even in middle school you’re …

Hell no. I don’t live on that street, but I paid for that parking. Resident only parking is for private land, not for publicly-owned streets.

The public is parking in the public parking spaces. Scandal!

Just because they want to drive doesn’t mean taxpayers should prioritize parking over housing. It’s not the responsibility of the public to subsidize bad habits. In fact, they should be …

Or, people who want private parking can buy homes with private parking spaces or refrain from whining when the public uses the public spaces that happen to be near their …

The general popularity factor, or social contagion, may be true, but many of the same personalities and ideologies were in the staff, commission, and council during that time. It would …

A study before COVID estimated over 10% of Humboldt students were homeless, and another 10% “housing insecure.” Homes are more important than parking spaces

Your comment made me smile. Kind of true but I do admit I enjoy the mocha freeze.

It’s not a problem though. It’s public parking and the public is parking in it.

Oh no, the public is using public parking!

Tied I love deer meat BACK Strap is the most tender best part AND the Heart is also the best

Just a reminder that The Village was planned well before removing parking requirements became popular.

Pretty sure it’s a legal requirement.