Photo by Sage Alexander.


###

The California Supreme Court upheld a decision Wednesday that cements the legality of county oversight of sheriff’s departments — and the body’s power to obtain records.

This order comes amid an effort to establish a civilian group that would oversee the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office.

A lawsuit filed by Sonoma County sheriff’s officers and their union had challenged the power of an oversight agency established by the county’s supervisors and voters. Earlier this year, a California appellate court found this body was legally authorized to subpoena the county sheriff’s office while probing whistleblower inquiries, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The justices unanimously denied an appeal of this finding on Wednesday, according to reporting from the San Francisco Chronicle. Involved attorneys told the Chronicle this ruling confirms that all counties have the power to create civilian sheriff oversight systems, which can have subpoena powers to compel documents from these offices.

Proponents of an in-the-works ordinance to establish civilian oversight of the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office lauded the decision.

“It establishes without question that counties may — it’s discretionary, if they choose — create an oversight commission,” said Larry Giventer, a proponent of the ordinance, in an interview.

Giventer, who was part of the Humboldt County Civil Grand Jury that recommended oversight of the Sheriff’s Office, and is a member of Eureka’s police oversight committee (though he emphasized he was speaking as an individual), said the kind of oversight proponents are seeking is similar to other California counties — and is the same type confirmed by Wednesday’s order.

The model for these oversight bodies in California comes without management or punitive function. The bodies review reports and make recommendations to the law enforcement agency.

For example, the city of Eureka’s system involves an independent police auditor that reviews complaints, reports from internal affairs and makes recommendations to the Eureka Police Department (EPD). Eureka’s citizen-led Community Oversight on Police Practices board works alongside the auditor in this work.

Giventer noted that of the about 30 recommendations of Eureka’s independent police auditor, Southern California-based OIR Group, EPD has implemented or is working to implement all reccomendations.

Giventer pointed out that state law previously explicitly gave county boards of supervisors and voters the power to make oversight boards. Under 2020’s Assembly Bill 1185 and 2025’s AB 847, these groups could issue subpoenas and access officer personnel files.

But the order issued Wednesday cements the constitutionality of oversight groups. This has statewide implications, with oversight commissions in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Marin and Monterey, attorneys told the Chronicle.

The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors recently advanced work towards a proposed ordinance to establish an oversight group. The board voted in May to form an ad hoc committee consisting of Second District Supervisor Michelle Bushnell, Fourth District Supervisor Natalie Arroyo and county staffers to develop a draft ordinance for a civilian-led oversight system that would eventually go to voters.

This followed proponents pushing to take the issue to voters and opposition from Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal. During public meetings on the matter, Honsal questioned if establishing oversight of an elected official was appropriate, and argued the public’s trust in the office is high.

A spokesperson from the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office did not return an emailed request for comment by publishing time.

For now, proponents are essentially waiting to see what happens with the county proposal. Giventer said the group is not presenting a deadline to the supervisors but is seeking further discussion and editing to understand the points of view of everyone, especially the sheriff.

At this time, he doesn’t know where the ordinance will end up. The route will either be an ordinance by county staffers or submitted a ballot initiative by proponents. He said proponents are hoping to meet with the sheriff in a couple of weeks.

“We’re confident that an oversight body would be a constructive improvement for law enforcement,” he said, explaining that it will add transparency, accountability and be a way for the public to ask questions of law enforcement. He emphasized the effort is not a criticism of the sheriff’s department.

PREVIOUSLY