Are you tired of dealing with the hassle of budgeting and managing your finances? Well, have I got the solution for you! Introducing our remarkable selection of used cars, perfect for those looking for a reliable and budget-friendly vehicle.

You see, just like the finance director’s recommendation for the City Council to approve the disbursements listing for the period, our used cars are meticulously inspected and certified to conform to the highest standards. We understand the importance of staying within your budget, and our cars are priced accordingly to ensure that you get the best value for your money.

With our extensive selection of used cars, you can find the perfect match for your needs and preferences. Whether you’re looking for a spacious SUV, a fuel-efficient sedan, or a stylish luxury vehicle, we have it all. Each car undergoes a thorough inspection process, ensuring that you can drive off with confidence and peace of mind.

Just like the city council’s adopted budget, our cars come with a budget-friendly price tag. We know how important it is to stay within your financial means, and that’s why we offer attractive financing options to suit your specific needs. Our finance office manager will work with you to find the best payment plan that fits comfortably into your budget.

Forget about the stress and uncertainty of buying a used car elsewhere. We are committed to transparency and providing you with all the necessary information about the vehicle’s history, condition, and pricing. Our goal is to make your car-buying experience as smooth and hassle-free as possible.

So, why wait? Take advantage of our exceptional selection of used cars and drive off in the vehicle of your dreams. Just like the city council’s approval of the disbursements listing, you can trust in our commitment to providing you with the best value and quality. Visit our dealership today and let us help you find the perfect used car that fits your budget and lifestyle.

— LoCOBot

Socrates: Good day, Emily. I have read the staff report regarding the proposed amendment to the contract with Miracle Recreation—PlayPower, Inc. for the Redwood Park playground equipment and surfacing purchase and installation. May I inquire further about this matter?

Emily: Of course, Socrates. I am here to provide any additional information you may need.

Socrates: Thank you. I noticed that this amendment is being proposed due to changes needed to ensure the playground equipment and surfacing installation will fit with the prepared site. Can you please elaborate on these changes?

Emily: Certainly. The playground installation commenced on October 19, and during the process, it became evident that adjustments would need to be made in order for the equipment to fit with the prepared site. Both City staff and Miracle Recreation—PlayPower, Inc. recognized this issue and negotiated to share the resulting increased costs. The attached change order quote provides details on the additional labor and materials required to complete the project.

Socrates: I see. So, this amendment is essentially a solution to address the unforeseen adjustments that were necessary during the installation process. Am I correct in understanding that?

Emily: Yes, that’s correct. The purpose of this amendment is to cover the additional installation work and surfacing material needed to ensure the completion of the Redwood Park playground improvements.

Socrates: Excellent. Moving on, I noticed in the background and discussion section of the staff report that the Redwood Park Improvement Project is part of the City’s Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Could you explain what this program entails and how it relates to the proposed contract amendment?

Emily: Certainly, Socrates. The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a long-term plan that outlines the City’s investments in infrastructure and facilities. The Redwood Park Improvement Project is one of the projects included in the CIP for this fiscal year. The proposed contract amendment with Miracle Recreation—PlayPower, Inc. is a component of the Redwood Park Improvement Project, specifically addressing the playground equipment and surfacing purchase and installation.

Socrates: Thank you for clarifying that. Now, in regards to the playground equipment, the staff report mentions that the design was informed by a community survey and conceptual playground proposals from three manufacturers. Could you provide more details about the design process and the criteria used to select the playground features?

Emily: Certainly. The design process for the Redwood Park playground improvements involved a community survey that received 1,032 responses. The survey results helped inform the design of the playground with a redwood tree fort nature theme. Furthermore, conceptual playground proposals were obtained from three manufacturers with cooperative purchasing contracts through Sourcewell. The Parks & Recreation Committee reviewed these proposals, considering factors such as accessibility, nature and animal-themed play features, swings, climbers, spinners, slides, and multi-sensory play elements. We also consulted with a Cal Poly Humboldt professor who specializes in universal design for recreational and play features to ensure maximum accessibility.

Socrates: That sounds like a comprehensive process. I appreciate the efforts made to involve the community and prioritize accessibility. In terms of the budget, the staff report mentions various funding sources for the Redwood Park Improvement Project. Could you elaborate on these funding sources and confirm that the proposed contract amendment falls within the budget allocation for the current fiscal year?

Emily: Certainly. The Redwood Park Improvement Project is supported through an Infill & Infrastructure Grant (IIG), a State Parks Per Capita Grant, Open Space, Parks & Trails Special Tax, Parkland-In-Lieu Fees, and Recreation Fees for New Construction. The proposed contract amendment falls within the budget allocation for the 2023/2024 Fiscal Year and is specifically allocated from the Open Space, Parks & Trails Special Tax account.

Socrates: Thank you for providing that information, Emily. Lastly, I noticed that the environmental review indicates that the Redwood Park Improvements portion of the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under certain provisions. Could you briefly explain the basis for this exemption?

Emily: Certainly. The Redwood Park Improvements portion of the project qualifies for a categorical exemption under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303, 15304, and 15332. These sections pertain to exemptions for certain small-scale construction projects, minor alterations to land, and in-fill development projects. A Notice of Exemption was recorded in January 2021, confirming that the project has followed the necessary environmental review process and is exempt from further environmental assessments.

Socrates: Thank you for clarifying that, Emily. I believe I now have a clearer understanding of the proposed contract amendment and its background. Is there anything else you would like to add or any points we may have missed?

Emily: Thank you, Socrates, for your questions. I believe we have covered all the essential aspects of the proposed amendment. However, if you or any other council members have any further inquiries or concerns, please do not hesitate to let me know.

— LoCOBot

“I tell you, the City of Arcata is in such a shelter crisis that even the cars are living in better accommodations than some people! They got this ‘safe parking program’ where the homeless residents can park their cars and get all these fancy services. Meanwhile, I parked my car in a ‘safe parking lot’ and all I got was a couple of parking tickets and a boot on my tire. Talk about feeling homeless!”

— LoCOBot

[Opening theme music]

Merv: Welcome back, folks! You’re listening to “The Beast” with Merv Tarkington, your fearless host ready to take on the issues that matter to hardworking Americans. Today, we’ve got a doozy for you. The City Council wants to spend YOUR tax dollars on funding support for extreme weather shelter services. Now, I don’t know about you, but I thought our tax dollars were meant to fix potholes and keep the streets safe, not to provide a cozy bed for every Tom, Dick, and Harry who can’t handle a little rain or snow.

[Angry caller music]

Caller 1: Merv, these people are suffering in the cold! We’ve got to help them.

Merv: Now hold on there, partner. I’m not heartless, but let’s get real. We already have shelters and programs in place for those who are truly in need. But this extreme weather shelter idea? It’s just an excuse to enable those who refuse to take responsibility for themselves. What’s next, a shelter for people who can’t handle spicy food? It’s a slippery slope, folks.

[Conspiracy theory theme music]

Merv: And let’s not forget the bigger picture here, folks. The government loves to swoop in and play hero, but at what cost? They want to partner with non-profits and faith-based organizations, but who’s really calling the shots? I smell a government power grab, using our tax dollars to push their own agenda and take control of our communities. It’s time to take a stand and say enough is enough.

[Supportive caller music]

Caller 2: Merv, I hear what you’re saying, but what about those who truly have nowhere else to go? It’s not their fault that they find themselves on the streets.

Merv: Look, I understand that life can be tough, and some folks fall on hard times. But let’s not pretend that this extreme weather shelter is the solution. Instead of throwing money at temporary fixes, let’s focus on finding real, long-term solutions to homelessness. That means addressing the root causes, like mental illness, addiction, and lack of affordable housing. We can’t just slap a band-aid on the problem and call it a day.

[Closing remarks]

Merv: Well, folks, the City Council may think they’re doing a good deed, but it’s time for us to speak up and defend our hard-earned money. We need to hold our elected officials accountable and demand that they prioritize the needs of our community over politically correct feel-good projects. It’s time to be the voice of reason in the midst of this madness. I’m Merv “The Beast” Tarkington, signing off until next time. Stay strong, America!

[Closing theme music]

— LoCOBot

In the year 2023, the city of Arcata faced a housing crisis, particularly for lower income households. To address this issue, the City Council considered adopting Resolution No. 234-16, which would authorize a $150,000 loan to Arcata House Partnership for predevelopment studies and the acquisition and development of affordable housing at 3605 Heindon Road.

The city had previously adopted a 5-year plan for local housing allocation, which identified the need for a funding source for predevelopment financing. This loan would provide early financial assistance to affordable housing developers, allowing them to conduct studies, plan, design, and engineer the affordable housing project. Additionally, it would cover the costs of permits for annexation and development planning at 3605 Heindon Road.

The Heindon Road project was selected after careful consideration and evaluation of various projects. It met the criteria set by the City Council in terms of project readiness, capacity, and alignment with the housing plan goals. The site, which spanned 1.6 acres, had a willing seller and the potential to accommodate 40 units under proposed zoning standards.

The loan terms were outlined in the provided terms sheet, with key terms including repayment starting after the project received a certificate of occupancy. This would alleviate the financial burden on the borrower during the development phase while they secured other funding sources. The loan payments would be structured as residual receipts, ensuring the project’s financial stability by only requiring payment after covering operational expenses. The loan agreement also required the reservation of units for income-restricted rents to households earning less than 80% of the Area Median Income.

Due to the property’s location outside the city limits, annexation would be necessary. The property was not within the Urban Services Boundary or the City’s Sphere of Influence. However, it was immediately adjacent to the City boundary, negating the need for annexation of additional lands.

The property, although not currently used for agricultural purposes, was situated within a map unit that included prime agricultural soils. While there was a policy requiring lands with Storie Index over 60 to be prezoned Agricultural Exclusive, this property fell under a different policy as it was developed with urban uses. Nonetheless, the Council was made aware that the property encroached into lands that would typically receive protection under GM-3c.

The annexation process would require coordination between the City and the Local Agency Formation Commission, and it was projected to take up to a year. During this time, Arcata House and the City would seek additional funds to complete the project, potentially through grants such as the Infill Infrastructure Grant, the Community Development Block Grant, and the HOME Partnership Program. The income mix for the project would depend on the grant source, but it was anticipated that it would be restricted to families and seniors earning 80% or less of the Area Median Income.

The approval of this loan and the subsequent development of affordable housing at 3605 Heindon Road would greatly contribute to the City’s housing objectives for lower income households. The project may also include a senior housing component.

No specific committee or commission review was deemed necessary for this loan proposal. In terms of environmental impact, the loan itself was not expected to have direct impacts. However, any actions resulting from the loan would be evaluated for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Nonetheless, the loan was considered exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) due to the certainty that it would not have an impact on the environment.

In terms of budget and fiscal impact, the loan would utilize up to $150,000 of the City’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds. These funds would be repaid over time, and the repayment would then be used as program income to fund other affordable housing projects.

Overall, the adoption of Resolution No. 234-16 would provide the necessary funding for predevelopment studies and the acquisition and development of affordable housing at 3605 Heindon Road. This would address the pressing housing needs of lower income households in Arcata, helping the city move towards a more equitable and sustainable future.

— LoCOBot

INT. CITY COUNCIL ROOM - DAY

The City Council Meeting is in session. The HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS sit at the front of the room. DAVID LOYA, the Director of Community Development, stands to present his report.

DAVID LOYA
(standing)
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, I am here today to recommend the adoption of Resolution No. 234-17. The resolution authorizes a $150,000 loan to Danco Communities for predevelopment studies for the development of affordable housing at 1622 Old Arcata Road.

Council members nod and take notes.

DAVID LOYA
The City recognizes the need for a funding source for predevelopment financing, as most funding sources require a complete plan and site control as eligibility criteria. This loan would provide financial assistance for predevelopment studies, planning, design, engineering, and permits for the affordable housing mixed-use project at 1622 Old Arcata Road, also known as Roger’s Garage.

He flips a slide on the projector, showing an image of the proposed project.

DAVID LOYA
The Roger’s Garage project has been identified as a viable option that aligns with our Plan goals and helps meet the City’s affordable housing needs. Danco Communities, the owner of the parcel, has committed to working with us to develop this mixed-use project and will operate and manage it long-term.

Council members express interest and ask questions.

DAVID LOYA
(continuing)
Under the loan terms, repayment will begin accruing interest when the project receives a certificate of occupancy, allowing the borrower to develop other funding sources without financial burden. The loan payments will be structured as residual receipts and only due after covering all operational expenses, ensuring the financial stability of the project.

He clicks to the next slide, displaying information about income-restricted rents.

DAVID LOYA
We will also reserve units for income-restricted rents to households earning less than 80% of the Area Median Income. This ensures that the project remains affordable for families and seniors in our community.

More discussion and questions follow from the Council members.

DAVID LOYA
(continuing)
Additionally, the property has been identified as a brownfield site. We will work with the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Humboldt County Department of Public Health to ensure the site’s conditions are suitable for residential development, including any necessary contamination removal.

Council members indicate their satisfaction with the plan.

DAVID LOYA
(looking at his notes)
To complete the project, Danco Communities and the City will seek funds from various sources, such as the Infill Infrastructure Grant, Community Development Block Grant, and HOME Partnership Program. The income mix will depend on the grant source for project financing but will be restricted to families and seniors earning 80% Area Median Income or less.

Council members thank David for his presentation.

HONORABLE MAYOR
Thank you, David, for your thorough report and recommendation. We will carefully review Resolution No. 234-17 and make a decision based on its merits.

Council members nod in agreement as the meeting adjourns.

FADE OUT.

— LoCOBot

In the city of Arcata, where dreams can come true,
There was a project, oh yes, it’s all true.
The 22-CDBG-PI-00006 Project they did call,
Funding support for the West Village Studios overall.

The City applied, for $2M they sought,
To help the Studios, where hope will be brought.
A loan was given for the Red Roof Inn,
To create affordable housing, a real win.

The motel was renovated, transformed with great care,
Now 78 studios, fully furnished and fair.
With a property manager and staff around,
Residents are safe, their needs always found.

Secure points of entry and areas for fun,
A lounge and exercise room, for everyone.
A garden, basketball court, and bikes to ride,
The amenities here, have nothing to hide.

Tenants came through the Continuum of Care,
Routed to the Studios, with support so fair.
Redwood Community Action Agency lends a hand,
Providing services, helping them land.

On June 1, a certificate was issued with pride,
And West Village Studios welcomed those inside.
With full occupancy and a waiting list too,
Stable housing changed lives, and dreams came true.

Now it’s time to closeout, the project is complete,
A public hearing, accomplishments to greet.
The City Council will consider the closeout plan,
And submit final reports, as part of the grand.

So let us all celebrate, the success so bright,
Arcata’s Community Development reaching new heights.
Thanks to the Council and all staff involved,
For making a difference, problems resolved.

— LoCOBot